All Activity
- Past hour
-
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: Adolescence (2025) camera and gear - Implications for the industry
- Today
-
And what about gopro as odd cinema camera replacement to shoot dwarfs extreme barrels sports😬
-
The rumours are all over the place!!! Who knows what we’ll get. My same wishes apply. 6k 50 no crop, super 3 way lcd and top evf. Faster processing. Happy for a video centric camera but looking for under 3000€ and video/photo switch
-
And the prices will be doing a Status Quo as well. Unless you are in America of course.
-
Adolescence (2025) camera and gear - Implications for the industry
Andrew Reid replied to EduPortas's topic in Cameras
I'm looking forward to it! -
Turned down my invite and refused the NDA. I'll follow it online and the rumours, with the rest.
-
I just think action-cam stuff belongs on a different website, and a different forum. EOSHD is about mirrorless cameras, cinema cameras and occasionally the odd smartphone. It's not about extreme sports shooting.
-
I expect the next gen will cost more, but still, why would anyone either not buy that or a used OG FX3? It just seems like a waste of time to me, but hey, what do I know?! Of more interest will be what Lumix pops out in this niche because lenses aside, an L Mount ‘FX3’ sounds more interesting to me than a Sony FX3.
-
Either the next gen will cost substantially more or they'll keep selling the 3a at a lower price after announcing the next generation for close to the same price. But your main point of "don't buy an FX3 right now" is fully valid. It's a 4-year old model. Other vendors have cameras that are highly competitive and arguably better. Sony needs to understand that failure to innovate (or slowness in innovation) is how they took so much business from Canon in the first place - and if their best idea for a "new" camera is to swap the display on an old one, the pendulum will be swinging back in short order.
-
Ninpo33 reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
Why would anyone bother with that? As a potential customer, are you simply not going to carry on with what you have and wait for the next gen, rather than trade it in with a big fat chunk of depreciation for this mildest of updates? For anyone (like me) who avoided due to the rear screen, (or went for it but has it rigged up anyway so not an issue), surely you are not going to buy one? Maybe I am missing something but makes zero sense to me. It would make more sense to be able to send in your old unit and have it upgraded for a reasonable amount?
-
Sergiobru reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
I like Sony Beta FX3 Max
-
Tim Sewell reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
So what I heard is that the 'A' moniker is because there is a FX3 Mk2 coming, but they will continue selling the original/this one.
-
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: New travel film-making setup and pipeline - I feel like the tech has finally come of age
-
Tim Sewell reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
One could make the argument that it should be the Sony Beta FX3. 😉
-
eatstoomuchjam reacted to a post in a topic: Our "ally" in the USA just bazooka'd the UK film industry
-
So other than some plug in stuff, the screen it deserved in the first place because all Sony cameras prior to the FX30 and A7RV have dog shit rear LCD's. I was actually going to go with a pair of A7CR's over my single unit A7RV but for a couple of things, the dealbreaker being those rear screens. So this is the mildest of updates at best hence the FX3A moniker though IMO they should have called it B and then everyone could refer to the OG as the 'A' model.
-
There are so many fine shots here. On the point of the 14-140mm, I've just picked one up with a G7 (yes, getting back into M43 because it's so much fun). I've seen so many great shots with it, not so much because it's a super high IQ but simply it's such a nice lens for composition, especially for travel. Here's another set of clips from James Morrissey with his GH2 (I still have mine too):
-
Emanuel reacted to a post in a topic: LUMIX FX3 Killer in April?
-
Emanuel reacted to a post in a topic: Action cam / 360 / GoPro etc. thread
-
Usually, action camera footage is crap. This doesn't mean the device itself is. Neither the possibilities we can get from. The fact the lowest price the more wider the basis of the users' skills is. A bit like audiences. You extend the range you'll lower the quality of your outcome, no many options ;- ) - EAG
-
Apparently the previous screen is no longer in production, which is why they've had to do this.
-
Might be a bit embarrassing if everybody starts running amok with action camera footage... Lots of youtubes out there done with action cameras. Still i think that there are many possibilities that can lead to making more informed content available and should they outgrow it, their already at the right place to ask questions.
-
The best cam is the one you bring and can shoot with. No other camera industry segment has so many upgrades as this one from so many sources. Finally, a place here where we can post it without feeling or sound intrusive in the middle of our sacred college of filmmakers. EAG :- )
-
Oh and can someone buy Lumix a 2025 calendar because it’s May 😱
-
So an FX3 with a higher res screen.
-
Our "ally" in the USA just bazooka'd the UK film industry
MrSMW replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
Is that such a bad thing? OK, maybe… -
Our "ally" in the USA just bazooka'd the UK film industry
eatstoomuchjam replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
That's not necessarily different from now. I spent a decent amount of time in Sao Paulo, Brazil since I'm dating somebody from there - and the prices for most media there are a lot lower than in the US, even pre-tariff. It makes sense - in a country where a lot of people make the minimum wage of $300/month, asking people to spend $20 to rent a new release movie is just going to result in a lot of piracy. Asking people to spend $1-4 to rent it will result in a lot less piracy and a lot more people paying to see your film. Basically, do you want 100% of $2 or do you want 100% of $0. So - movie rental is already a sliding scale price-wise, depending on the country/region - presumably based on some inflection point, real or perceived, where people will either just bootleg or not watch it at all. - Yesterday
-
Our "ally" in the USA just bazooka'd the UK film industry
EduPortas replied to Andrew Reid's topic in Cameras
This is a great idea, in principle. Problem is the market will be severely reduced if you leave out USA consumers, the biggest and most important group of buyers out there. And even if you let them access your movie, someone in India will pay $6.99, for example, while a viewer in the USA $13.98, if the tariff comes through. That's a huge disincentive. Other than Japan, China, and India which have had strong internal media markets for decades, I don't see any country surviving this, not even the UK. -
Sounds fair. Lot of peoples first forays into video begin with an action camera of some kind.
-
As FX30 owner, no way to ignore it... For some reason they haven't called it FX3B ; )