92F

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTFBjaKApV4 Everything is compromised according to our use, our needs, our efficiency in production...and our aesthetic sensitivity. We win on one side, we lose on the other.... which is the best?

What are your settings ? Are you on a tripod with the 18-135 ?

👍

👍

it could have been shot with anything... and in FHD

Excuse me, the texte of FoxAdriano is

It's ridiculous because it's precisely the concept: the log is no contrast because you want to settle it in post production. If you don't want to work in post production you have to find the Picture Profile closest to the log but more contrasted like the Ciné D II or Flat or .... Make your choice and learn how to use it https://youtu.be/nvoSMMhp1C8?t=193 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PttHBa-s_pI

" Test 2 of a7SIII vs S5II. 24-70 GM II vs Sigma 24-70 L Mount. AF settings are set to default on both setups and WB is set to 5600K on both the whole time. The same LUT is applied over both clips with the only a few minor exposure tweaks to get them closer in color. The S5II was shot in VLOG and the a7SIII was shot in S-LOG3.Cine" Testing Sony a7SIII vs Lumix S5II - 24-70 GM II vs Sigma 24-70 L Mount.

EDIT – we reached out to Panasonic to clarify the base ISO’s of the GH6 with or without DR boost mode: DR Boost “ON”: V-Log / HLG: ISO2000 DR Boost “ON”: other picture profiles: ISO800 DR Boost “OFF”: V-Log / HLG ISO250 (initially we thought 800). DR Boost “OFF”: other picture profiles: ISO100 https://www.cined.com/panasonic-lumix-gh6-lab-test-rolling-shutter-dynamic-range-and-latitude/

Not everyone seems able to reproduce it? However for the AF of the GH5 all the Web spoke about it, finally. A comparison in Standard PP mode with an R6 II or an A7IV would make it possible to better assess this less organic smoothing

https://www.cined.com/panasonic-lumix-s5-ii-lab-test-rolling-shutter-dynamic-range-and-latitude/

Ok with you ... Subject to deepen by changing the settings but not so alarming .. the GH5 could also offer waxy faces With the more solid codecs of the S5X will we have the same thing ?

Quelques comparaisons Vous pouvez également récupérer des fichiers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBv28suvRP8

Neither back-illuminated nor stacked,

https://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/using/color-management.html

To benefit from the metadata options of image stabilization and lens variation compensation of the XF30 you need use Catalyst Prepare Plugin for Premiere Pro ($100/year) or exit in Sony Catalyze Prepare An example of stabilization without post production https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMdY0UpLU8Y

Exact....

I hope it's not a problem here

2 very good test very thorough with a good analysis -https://www.repaire.net/forums/articles/canon-r5c-vs-canon-r5-des-performances-en-video-tres-differentes.1274/ -https://www.repaire.net/forums/articles/testbox-canon-r5c-comparatif-canon-c70-sony-fx6-red-v-raptor.1275/

Question to hyalinejim Can you film for a long time without significant heat problems, whatever the codec? What strategy do you use for the ventilator? Can it be heard with an external microphone?

A good shot with the XF 605... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm22jlRD60g

Yes ...but it's an all in one, reliable, nothing to add Fashion is FF and there is the DVX 200 in M4/3 at the same price, only it won't have the look of a Hybrid M4/3... It is a choice according to his real needs ... that of the customer

What settings, Codecs etc ... Filmed by hand ? With what stabilization setting ..? Thank You

Compact, light enough ... it seems to be a good compromise ... You filmed in full automatic ?