92F

Do you think that everyone who uses 32bit Float works under the same conditions as you? You just gave the answer..it's no..they would be unemployed. Besides, would they come here to ask for advice on the use of 32 Bit float ? No also So all the others can use the 32 bist float ... the microphone is no more a brake in 24 bits than in 32 bits Float you explained it very well. But in 24 bits you can use a limit which is another more classic way to secure your sound ... and there is no need for 32 bit float but everyone chooses their method. For me it is now very clear .... a big thank you for your help

This is for me the definition of a good sound engineer. Here is a discussion on the same subject (32 bits Float) in French with some old and good sound engineer...: "Not revolutionary but makes good service " I like this conclusion... https://www.repaire.net/forums/discussions/le-32-bits-a-virgule-flottante-en-question.292069/#post-1970448138 After each one chooses the right tool for him according to the moment and there are many tools which use the 32 bits floating point comme le Zoom F2, Zoom F3.... or SoundDevice MixPre 10 II (not really amateur) , MixPre 3 II , MixPre 6 II ou encore Tentacle Track E - Timecode Audio Recorder... Tascam is the least to day ? it is not a gadget and it is limited only by the one who places his microphone, not by the microphone itself (or we do not know how to choose it and place it... SPL 120 dB is already good for many situation ). .. If we take that into account, there is no reason not to use 32 bits float... Thanks for your kind reply and good day...👍

Ok i am agree whith you, of course it's better to use a sound engineer who monitors perfectly So I'm going back to my idea,: with the same usual microphone in solo and well placed, the 32 bits will avoid a backup sound recording under modulated for example. (in report)... But I understand that for you it's more a problem than a help.. Thanks for your kind reply

I don't understand ?! If you use a classic recorder, it will be the same because the modulation is done at the preamp level of the recorder... right? The 32-bit float records automatically by sub-modulating and is recovered afterwards in post production ... like a log with limits, the limits of the sensor. Thanks

You mean the wheel..? You mean the wheel..? It's just an up and down in the menu to check between 2 LUTs

I don't really understand the pb... I don't have the S5II However, it clearly shows that you can display your viewing LUT on the APN screen (not HDMI) and how to select it...no?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v1B3wnupWI

Is the Canon XF 605 not the best quality / size / price compromise of the moment ...? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsbCajW5cmk But the image quality will remain more digital than a C70 for example... which is not a problem in many reports...

You talked about emulation nothing to do with what was filmed ... it's your TV the problem turn it off So a film shot in 24p on Osmo Pocket on your weekend purchases is more cinematic than a film shot with a Full Frame camera in 50 or 60p in Log...?!? I think you should open a new topic on it... and have a good day

You talked about emulation nothing to do with what was filmed ... it's your TV the problem turn it off So a film shot in 24p on Osmo Pocket on your weekend purchases is more cinematic than a film shot with a Full Frame camera in 50 or 60p in Log...?!? I think you should open a new topic on it... and have a good day

There are many factors that make a movie aesthetic Lens / light / sensor / Log or raw / shutter speed / framing / story / good actors / good direction of actors / editing / ... so the 24 p, the aspect ratio is quite negligible for the viewer. Picasso and Monet are not paintings because they are not like Leonardo da Vinci? ....is stupid. You prefer vertical 24p vs 60p wide ...? 😒 The subject is the FX30 ... Peace and love 😄

What is your binaural system ?

Hello Mark To compare the rendered images... what equipment (body and lens) did you use in this great video.. (FHD ? 4K ? Log ?...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZdMxFiUf9Q This music is so sweet to my ears

Not impossible that the AF is a bit the cause ? Take a good look, there is a moment when the sharpness changes both on the S5 and S5 II side... look at the freckles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTFBjaKApV4 Everything is compromised according to our use, our needs, our efficiency in production...and our aesthetic sensitivity. We win on one side, we lose on the other.... which is the best?

What are your settings ? Are you on a tripod with the 18-135 ?

👍

👍

it could have been shot with anything... and in FHD

Excuse me, the texte of FoxAdriano is

It's ridiculous because it's precisely the concept: the log is no contrast because you want to settle it in post production. If you don't want to work in post production you have to find the Picture Profile closest to the log but more contrasted like the Ciné D II or Flat or .... Make your choice and learn how to use it https://youtu.be/nvoSMMhp1C8?t=193 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PttHBa-s_pI

" Test 2 of a7SIII vs S5II. 24-70 GM II vs Sigma 24-70 L Mount. AF settings are set to default on both setups and WB is set to 5600K on both the whole time. The same LUT is applied over both clips with the only a few minor exposure tweaks to get them closer in color. The S5II was shot in VLOG and the a7SIII was shot in S-LOG3.Cine" Testing Sony a7SIII vs Lumix S5II - 24-70 GM II vs Sigma 24-70 L Mount.

EDIT – we reached out to Panasonic to clarify the base ISO’s of the GH6 with or without DR boost mode: DR Boost “ON”: V-Log / HLG: ISO2000 DR Boost “ON”: other picture profiles: ISO800 DR Boost “OFF”: V-Log / HLG ISO250 (initially we thought 800). DR Boost “OFF”: other picture profiles: ISO100 https://www.cined.com/panasonic-lumix-gh6-lab-test-rolling-shutter-dynamic-range-and-latitude/

Not everyone seems able to reproduce it? However for the AF of the GH5 all the Web spoke about it, finally. A comparison in Standard PP mode with an R6 II or an A7IV would make it possible to better assess this less organic smoothing

https://www.cined.com/panasonic-lumix-s5-ii-lab-test-rolling-shutter-dynamic-range-and-latitude/