Jump to content

Sid

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sid

  1. I was only here for three years because I didn't really know the site before.  I am guilty as charged for posting frivolous stuff on the forums.  If I am honest I think this was insecurity that I didn't have the skillset of the other users.

    This has been a unique site led by the finest host.  How does one quantify that ?  Because it is the most stone-cold honest of all by a long mile.  Thus any "brash" or "rude" qualities have always seemed entirely in context to me.  In that spirit, I must say End of EOSHD vid is one of the finest presentations of all time, evoking a range of emotion, from a certain perhaps unintentional humour to mostly the feeling of tremendous sadness.

    I don't want to get political or peddle my own corner, but the Lockdowns have been very tough, and horrible to see what is happening to others.  I risk yet another frivolous post, but Andrew I truly hope you stay and extend my very best wishes to you if you choose otherwise.

    🙂 ❤️

  2. I really would very much like to see the foveon sensor FP version.  However, my undestanding is that the current Sigma foveon Quattro line is actually a backward step from their own previous Merrill models, because they did some sort of compromise to reduce the capture time, but it cost in terms of "micro-contrast".  I read about it here:-

    https://medium.com/ice-cream-geometry/an-ode-to-the-sigma-merrill-506dd0864169

    So hopefully, they will go back to the previous Merrill readout, but I'll submit to the wisdom of others here.  :)

     

  3. 18 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

    I get the feeling future is bright for Sigma's full frame cameras.

    They do seem committed, but the Foveon full-frame being cancelled - I read someone saying the FP sales may have been the real reason, or will they still do the Foveon in the future ?  I hope they do it.

  4. Quote

    1D X Mark III – where does it fit?

    At the very, very top.

    I know things are relative and many other users (plus Andrew of course) may have a better handle than me on these things.  I want this camera and it is way too pricey, but here's the thing - why should anyone care what I want ?  And most respectfully to others here the reverse argument is also true.  No one is going to send me to the deepest tropics to capture the wildlife anytime soon...or the coldest tundra, or a high end fashion shoot, but if I was of such calibre, surely 1DX Mk3 is what I would want in my hand.  And the potential video quality in-camera is out of this world.  Canon have answered Andrew's spoof "Canon Rep" vids and the "C800" mockup in a very big way and deliberately shown no quarter to Atomos on the way - that is very impressive for sure.   :)

     

  5. Sounds like someone may have invented a compressed version of the truth too.  Btw, notice how Canon announce 1DXMk3, and a head honcho immediately flees with his holographic flipcam.  Remember that whole thing with the original C300 and Scarlet, even though Canon had done absolutely nothing to provoke Red in any way ?

    http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?63669-SCARLET....&p=825560&viewfull=1#post825560

    http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?63669-SCARLET....&p=825630&viewfull=1#post825630

    How does it look now ?

  6. Regarding audio, I believe FP has a built-in microphone, so isn't the "proper" workflow to record scratch audio and sync up to separate audio recording anyway ?  Otherwise surely we're talking XLR type inputs....which changes the idea of the camera ?  Like a masochist, I may hold out to see what the Canon mirrorless version of 5DXMk3 is like (excellent for a price I'm sure), but common sense says to me grab the Sigma now...

  7. I hadn't previously been aware of the oil splashing issue on their high end models like 1DXMk2.  When I looked further I found a refernce from Canon dated 2009 stating they would fix it going forward.  That does worry me if it has still not been addressed by now.

    https://cpn.canon-europe.com/content/news/EOS_oil_spots.do

    Probably only in a tiny minority of cameras, but fact is that we are not all high end photographers, so many users "treat themselves" to expensive kit beyond what is financially sensible.  Imagine getting a lemon in that situation.  But these Mk3 specs in a mirrorless could really tip me to getting one.

  8. 6 hours ago, mat33 said:

    I really really hope this is the spiritual successor to the digital bolex.

    Agreed.  So curious about what Sigma manage to achieve with video resolution on the Foveon version, which could be more like the Bolex reincarnated.  Purely from memory, Andrew wrote the Bolex shoots at ISO 100 and pretty much has to stay there, and one expects similar video compromise with Foveon, but it might well really shine if played to the strengths.

  9. 46 minutes ago, nathlas said:

    Half nude tragedy

    Ok. Let's agree on this.

    There is noone to buy those two cameras for AF perfomance. They both rely on same technology that we all know it's not efficient.

     

    Let's concetrate on image quality thay can deliver.

     

     

    On the Youtube comments, one person asks "What is happening in the highlights?"  The FP does look relatively more blown out as the girl approaches into the sunlight.

  10. Very good article with interesting perspective, but could an unconscious bias still be creeping in ?  Hypothetically, if the Panasonic S1H had originally been announced with these specs and price, with Canon announcing nothing, I'm guessing Panasonic would have gotten accolades and Canon still the punchbag.  Perspective is a strange and fickle thing.  I was so tempted by the Sigma FP but now want to see the Foveon version.  Crazily, I am in a cold sweat for this MkIII, but yeah the price is beyond me.

×
×
  • Create New...