Jump to content

Rodolfo Fernandes

Members
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rodolfo Fernandes

  1. On 20/03/2017 at 1:18 AM, Edward said:

    Wait, how exactly did you achieve this look? By stacking pro color AND another.. lut? 

    It's just a LUT at maybe 20% to make it slightly warmer over the EOSHD (Cine4) settings, its a screen grab from a short clip im almost done with, when its finished ill post here

  2. 12 hours ago, markr041 said:

    I like that picture, but that is not what EOSHD looks like out of the camera:

     

    No it is not, but is pretty damn close to this, normal color profile won't allow me to get this end result with this little work put into it and thats why i like it. And its not a picture its a video frame grab

  3. Sorry if this already been awnsered, but wich mount comes with the NXL? It says its compatible with a whole lot of mounts (and i need Nikon) but when trying to purchase it don't get to say with mount i need and its not written anywhere with wich mounts it comes with

  4. I have a D800 have done some videos with it and feel its a bit too soft so i got myself a G7 to try out 4K video and liked it and colours but wanted something a bit more serious and with slow-motion.

    I have read about the Sony's a6300 and a6500 cameras and know about the heating issue, altho i never shoot long videos like for more than 5min or more in a row and i think the a6500 can handle even more without over-heating.
    I have seen what the NX1 can do, and its impressive in terms of detail and colours, both the a6500 and NX1 have awesome 4k video and the 120p option (which i really like), i now the NX1 colours are better straight out of the camera but the a6500 has S-log which with work i think can look even better than the NX1 and since its LOG it gives more leverage(?).
    I also think the IBIS on the Sony could be a reallly nice thing since i always shoot handheld or with a monopod, and that is a big plus over the NX1.

    I could get the a6500 and a lens turbo for about 1550€ and use my NIkon lenses (14mm f2.8, 35mm f1.4, 85mm f1.8, etc.) and have a nice kit which would allow me to do a bit of everything, have an almost full-frame look, 120p, LOG and IBIS.

    Or the NX1 for around 900€ used, get an adaptor have a nice kit also but with no IBIS or LOG.

    My true question is, since i want to get serious with video and start doing music videos and other related stuff, should i pay more for the IBIS and LOG? Or will i be better off with the NX1 or is the difference in price just not worth it.

    PS - Where i live there isn't any chance of renting gear since there aren't any camera stores, so i can't test any of them out

  5. I was on the same boat as you, i had been shooting stills for some time (D800) and wanted to get into video just for the fun of it so i got a G7 and the Zhongyi Lens Turbo Adapter, this way i can still use my lenses and have 4k and the 60p HD option. I am actually selling that kit at the moment (the G7 with kit lens + adapter). PM me if you are interested.

    This was shot with that kit (G7 with lens adapter with 35mm f1.4 sigma art and Samyang 14mm f2.8) last saturday and edited on the same day, it was meant to be a test.
     

     

  6. 4 hours ago, Cinegain said:

    Gorgeous stuff! Well done. Gotta love the organic Nikon rendering. Hopefully the next Nikons to come out will me more tricked out for video.

    thank you! the footage looks nice and is nice to play around with when nicely lit

  7. 3 minutes ago, dahlfors said:

    Avoid the flaat profiles on D800. They are only useful if you need to cram out the most dynamic range for some special shots. D800 will produce the best results if you use the standard / profile / neutral profiles as-is - or tweak them a little bit.

    I also have the 85mm f/2 AI-S on a D800 - and I really like that lens.

    Will do, i thought the Flaat profiles was the way to go

  8. I do some video with a D800 and 35mm Sigma Art Lens, and the detail surprises me always, i also have a 85mm f2 AI-S but it doesn't cut it, i honestly never tried the Flat profile that comes with the camera i always use Flaat11, you guys prefer the Flat profile to the Flaat11 ? if so, why is that?

  9. 31 minutes ago, bigfried said:

    YES! This is so obvious, crazy purple fringing and blown highlights ruining most shots! Everyone is saying this is so great but to me it looks awful. I have just received my X-T2, its sitting in its box at home and I'm not sure whether to rush back and rip it open and get shooting or send it back and swap for a Sony A7ii, Sony 6300 or keep my Lumix GX80. This is good timing for Andrew to review the X-T" but that video has left me with real doubts.

     

    Is it just due to the 1.2 lens wide open and grading or is there a real problem with this camera?

     

     

    Are you asking if color fringing is a real problem with the camera?

  10. I looked a bit and there isnt many topics here on grading footage from the D800, i have used Neutral, Flat10 and Flat11 and Cinestyle, and Flat11 is the easyest one to grade. I shot this with the D800 on Flat11 with the 64mbps hack, and i liked how it turned out, cinestyle doesnt turn out that good, its harder to bring back the tones. Does anyone have a favorite LUT+Profile combo thats works out fine with the D800?

    vQ6SC1k.jpg

    y9kLqBi.jpg

    Bm3AtxZ.jpg

    7lOHoNf.jpg

    nYAxYh5.jpg

    6Q2kO6W.jpg

    NuX9sb2.jpg

    hrhl8L9.jpg

    uS9LBDt.jpg

    1FqTOQS.jpg

    gOmfFv1.jpg

    bRjcDVn.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...