Jump to content

mercer

Members
  • Posts

    7,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mercer

  1. I commented on a couple of his posts, but the man acts like a child, or a politician that changes their statements and facts to support their narrative. I don't debate children or politicians, so I stopped commenting, and stopped reading... It was liberating.

    Nobody will change his mind. He is convinced he has some form of justice, or righteousness on his side.

    I am glad I spoke up against him because he didn't have the right to smear people without iron clad, proven evidence, but to continue is just an exercise in futility.

    Of course, he didn't use my PMs against me, so I cannot blame Neumann for wanting his story to be told. 

  2. Does anyone know how the Tokina 28-70 holds up when blown up on the big screen? I'm currently choosing between this, the Nikon 28-70 (Bourne len), or just going primes. 

    Andy Lee is the person to ask, but I assume he will say the Bourne lens. I just got a good copy of the Tokina 28-70 in MD mount. The day it arrived, my dream zoom, the Tokina AT-X 24-40mm 2.8 constant became available, so I bought that one too. I did test the 28-70mm and it is a nice lens. Part of me wants to keep it, but I have too many lenses already. To ebay it will go. 

  3. I really hope this new line of BM camera is where they conquer a lot of the nagging issues.  FPN, poor low light performance etc. 

    I feel like it will be.  If this new URSA cam hits enough marks I'm all in on moving to them full time.  Sorry RED.  I love ya but my bank account does not.

    I remember a great video you shot with MD lenses and a rebel, look forward to what you can do with an ursa. 

  4. Hey no problem, man. Good stuff Keep at it. What lens did you use on your pocket cam? I almost bought a pocket camera last year when the sale was on but I flinched, thinking they were just dumping inventory, for a newer model... Instead they released a firmware update that fixed a lot of the negatives for me. Oh well, my Canon eos-m still works. 

  5. Just picked up a Tokina AT-X 24-40mm in FD mount. I was looking for a Konica AR version, because the adapter is much smaller, but I couldn't pass this lens up in the condition it was in and the price they wanted. 

    Anybody have any experience with this lens? I saw a few videos online and I was really impressed. On my aps-c sensor it will be a nice 36mm to 60mm... Nothing too extravagant but I could probably shoot, nearly, an entire film on this bad boy.

  6. Okay, I forgot to add one critique, it really isn't something you did wrong, because there is no wrong in these types of pieces. But in the middle, there was one or two cuts where you cut from one shot of the ocean to a similar angle of the ocean. I prefer it when you cut and show a completely different angle or a completely different image. 

  7. I liked it. You had some nice shots and a good command of the camera. If anything, I may have liked to hear some ambient sound of the ocean or the breeze, just to add a little more of a haunting feel to the piece, but all in all good stuff.

    If if you're interested in narrative filmmaking, how could you use that footage and turn it into a story? 

    You have about a minute. What if I told you, it had to be 3 minutes long? What could you add to it, what story could you tell within the parameters you have already created?

    But as is, it is good. 

  8. People love to hate Canon. I just get so surprised how loyal people are to the brand of camera they have. Is it because they just spent a butt load on a new camera, and then another brand comes out with a new camera that tops it, and they get pissed off? Or are people just so obsessed with their team that they have to knock every other camera in the world? I mean this is seriously funny. Is this canon the perfect low budget, micro budget, indie film camera... No. I don't think it was ever supposed to be. But it still looks like a pretty good camera when you read the specs and after further thought, they probably will sell some to journalists and to owners of the c100 who are looking for a good b-cam to hand to a crew members. I mean, people knock canon, a lot of times with good reason, but they usually make a pretty good product so I'm sure this will be one of them. And if they drop the price to between 1800 and 2200, I bet a lot of you guys will own one. If I had the money I would probably buy one for one of my more marketable movie ideas. I think where canon is really failing is their inability to recognize or support no budget filmmakers. But they've always done that. if they came out with a 1 inch or aps-c mirrorless between 1200 to 1500 rebel cinema camera with interchangeable lenses that shoots 2.7k, 1080 at high bitrates with good sound capabilities, and built in ml features they would own that market again and they obviously have the technology. I am actually interested in what they are going to bring to the action cam market. They may accidentally give some amazing features to compete with gopro. 

  9. At 2500, this camera is a no go. At a grand... I may consider this over the FZ1000. It really is ashame these camera manufactures do not realize the market. Unfortunately, they believe that if they include too much at a lower price point then they will be hurting the sales of higher end cameras. But this camera will never compete with their own cinema line and at 2500, they won't even sell any to their "professional" customers. If this price was low enough, younger, inexperienced filmmakers might buy this as a starter cinema camera. Or someone like me that works on a no budget level but would like to upgrade to 4k. 

  10. I feel the more you shoot, the more ideas you will have. You will become familiarized with your equipment and learn what it can do and what you can do with it. Sometimes, I will just drive out to a nearby state park and do some lens tests. The physical act of messing with lenses and equipment frees my mind to concentrate on ideas. Don't concern yourself with rigs or follow focus, just throw a lens on you camera and press the little red button.

    You'd be surprised at what you can do with just a camera and a lens. If you're feeling fancy bring a small monopod with you so maybe, just maybe you can get some b-roll. And if you're really lucky, the way the sun hits a puddle and the reflection of the flare off the rippling water might just inspire a shot. Sometimes something as simple as a shot can inspire an entire concept. 

  11. Sorry about all of these questions, but since you are the resident lens expert, I thought you may know. These zeiss lenses I just bought are my first foray into German glass. From the footage I have seen online, I think I may like it better than Japanese glass. Of course, I will always love my Minolta MCs and MDs and my Pentax K version lenses. 

  12. Meyer-Optik Görlitz Domiplan , Zeiss Jenas and Pentacons are all similar they where competing agaist each other in the 60s and 70s

    then they all merged into one company

    My favourite out of this lot is the A.Schacht Edixa - Travenar - A 2.8 50mm

    this lens just has something about it that makes it stand out , its low contrast , a bit soft but has a certain mojo when used fully wide open an 2.8 -

    its definately has the FILMIC CINEMATIC look we all like!! its just very good on digital cameras

    I use it alot on pop videos for shooting mediums and close ups especially faces

     

    94

    Thanks, I'll have to look out for one. These German lenses aren't as easy to come by on this side of the pond. 

    I have read that after the "merger" the quality control wasn't as good, but are the optical qualities the same?

  13. The driving through Hollywood footage was great. I really liked the grade you did on those shots. They looked so different from the rest of the footage, so I just figured you had used stock footage. Also. I must say your main actress is pretty easy on the eyes. Oh yeah and she wasn't a bad actress either. You obviously are very informed with sound. Half of what you said went over my head. 

  14. ​I do not downsample 4K video. I see no need (of course Vegas Pro can do that - it is one the most powerful editors). I also see no need to convert to intermediate codecs of any kind. If you have the right computer/software, you can edit natively 4K video clips and play 4K video as well. The videos I upload are all 4K. 4K videos look great on HD monitors and HDTV's. They scale fine.

    So you don't notice any loss in quality editing the h.264 files natively? I guess you're not doing much grading?

  15. ​I edit in Sony Vegas Pro 13. There is no need to transcode; the files are standard H264 MP4. The workflow is no different for the GoPro than for any 4K video camera. But you can use the free version of Cineform (GoPro Studio) if you wish.

    Thanks, I usually convert everything to prores but from what I have read, the gopro footage works well with Cineform. Are you just editing it as 4k, or do you downsample it to 1080p in Vegas, if Vegas even does that... I use Mac. 

  16. I really liked both videos. The gopro 4k looks awesome. What are your guy's workflow? I am thinking about picking up a silver for 2.7k. I have an idea for a short that this camera will be perfect for, but the workflow seems questionable. I know a lot of people are transcoding to cineform, but do you need the studio version of the software for that or can you do it with the free version?

×
×
  • Create New...