Tim Sewell

I can't see this happening - not only is what John said true - they'd be cheaper for shows to buy than to rent, but for the rental houses themselves the rent they could charge likely wouldn't cover their costs in terms of storage/personnel/insurance/marketing/admin etc. These companies have cost bases built around the kind of revenue they get from renting out the big boys' toys.

THis thread has a wealth of information on hard lighting techniques: http://www.cinematography.com/index.php?showtopic=67478&page=1

Or a couple of un-diffused blondes sufficiently close to the talent that your exposure can let the daylight-lit office take care of itself.

Good points, @tupp - thanks.

To be honest, fabric bought from generic suppliers is so cheap it wouldn't make any sense to spend the time (although Hove, where I live, is the charity shop Mecca of Sussex!).

Hi Dan Great! I'll PM you my details. Tim Hi - I'll definitely be in touch if things don't work out. Thanks Tim

Hi - I've bought a second hand Quartzcolor Antares 2.5k tungsten soft light. I didn't realise how bloody huge it would be - far too big to remain in my house! If anyone would like it and can collect it from me in Brighton/UK - you'd not only be welcome to it - I'll buy you a pint as well!

A progress report: The Lastolite 2m square frame arrived. Gosh! 2m is actually quite big, isn't it! Anyway - the fabric samples also arrived and to my eye there are 3 types worth pursuing. The bridal tulle will, I think, work very well for diffusing daylight with very little loss of luminance. The ripstop parachute nylon looks like an excellent choice to diffuse a lighting instrument (I have a 2.5k tungsten fixture I picked up on eBay arriving soon) and, lastly, plain old white muslin looks like a good in-between choice (and obviously makes for an excellent bounce as well). So I now just have to find these fabrics in 2m wide rolls and order sufficient to make the panels - I'm thinking iron-on velcro will be the best (and easiest) solution for fixing to the frame.

I think they just announced availability of the free version for Linux the other day.

https://videodirect.amazon.com/home/landing - not sure if this will offer everything you need - but it may get close.

Actually the C100ii, if you lose the top handle, just looks like an oversized SLR - no extra rigging required. I figure - given that most thieves are pretty stupid - that bad guys would just figure you couldn't afford a new, small, sexy camera and leave you alone. Of course if you need decent sound that's a different matter, but for a lot of the stuff you shoot, where you're putting a music track wholly or partially over the location sound it would be aces. And I know your work, so I know you'd love the image! Edited to add that the movie is fantastic - everything we've come to expect from you and more. Also (and this is important) I get that it's not just pretty pictures - there seems to me to be a subtly implied message as well.

Have any of you guys seen this site before: http://www.kitmondo.com/used-broadcast-equipment? My wallet is cowering in the corner of a darkened room.

Apparently shipping now USD5995.

The saga so far has seen me order 3 different fabrics. A white ripstop parachute nylon (suggested by the estimable Phil Rhodes), a classic sailcloth and some 'bridal' tulle. Picked up a length of muslin while I was there! Frame-wise I was pricing stuff up and it works out that just buying a couple of Manfrotto Lastolite 2mx2m frames will be cheaper than trying to build my own. I'll keep the board posted as to my progress.

I've got a set of Samyang/Rokinon primes and they're mostly around T1.5, so should the need arise I'll probably have to go with them. The only fastish EF lenses I have are the nifty fifty and the 85 1.8. I also have the 17-55 2.8. My feeling is that with the camera's fairly stellar low light performance super fast lenses, while nice to have, aren't quite as important as they might be with other cameras. Of course I'm very aware that - as I don't have to earn my money doing this - a super noise-free image isn't a priority as I'm generally applying fairly stylised grades anyway.

Wow! The 55-250 just arrived. DPAF with STM is virtually indistinguishable from magic.

So I'm looking to build a couple of home-made butterfly frames and silks and I'm balking at paying hundreds of pounds for the fabric just because it comes from a grip supplies company. I'm sure it must be available from a standard fabric shop for much less - but I haven't been able to find out exactly what sort/weight of silk (or more likely rayon) I should look for. Does the EOSHD hive mind have any pointers please?

I have to plus-1 for the C100 mkii. I recently sold my other cameras to buy a secondhand one (GBP3000) and although I've been pretty much confined to quarters due to a combination of work and bad weather since it arrived, what little I've been able to shoot has given me an experience I never had with any of the others. I loaded the log footage into FCPX, applied a technical LUT and felt my jaw hit the floor. Just an all-round gorgeous image. Experiments in the kitchen in low light were also mandible-lowering, it simply knocks the socks off anything I've ever used before in the way the IQ holds up at high ISOs. Add to that the ease-of-use, the astonishing battery life, the parsimonious-yet-gradeable codec, the NDs and you have a machine that you just want to pick up every time you have a moment spare. I have the 55-250 and 18-135 STMs arriving over the next few days and, weather permitting, an afternoon filming my son in a tennis tournament at the weekend and I just can't wait. I'll just also add that I've had an idea for a micro-documentary brewing in my mind for some time, but just couldn't figure out a way to do it single handed with my previous gear. Just my around-the-house experience so far with the C100 mkii has finally given me the confidence to set to work on it and I have a meeting soon with the subject to get it all in place - so thanks, Canon!

Here's an amazingly detailed and informative video of a presentation given by David Mullen ASC on (mainly) simulating daylight.

I think his blog is something like the fifth most influential in this field.

Well look at this - newsshooter to the rescue: http://www.newsshooter.com/2017/02/23/masv-rush-a-super-fast-pay-as-you-go-file-transfer-system-for-the-professional-video-production-industry/

You might want to take a look at Amazon's S3 service.

Based on very recent experience - Canon C100 mkii.

Maybe I'll have to up my budget a little. I'm not even slightly interested in a electronic gimbal - I basically want something that will allow me to fly the camera for short periods and double as an impromptu monopod - just like the unit I have now does, but suitably sturdier/heavier to deal with the heavier camera. I'll probably be using an adapted Olympus OM 28mm 2.8 that I love, stopped down a little.

Cool. I've been playing with this sort of thing too - trying to create a digital tobacco filter. Hadn't tried blending with 'Soften' mode, though, so that's this evening's activities planned for me! Thanks.