Noli

Looks like some people need to learn what’s censorship and what’s standing up against immorality, racism, nationalism and worse.

Hello.  Here is the official answer from Sigma about 0.1 second shutter lag:
 
”We are so sorry that your fp is showing a lag between the moment of release and the actual picture. We are aware of this, and unfortunately, this is how fp works at this point. This is a display lag happening between the sensor and LCD.
 
I will forward your message to our engineer team, and they will check if there is something they can do to fix this. However, at this moment, we have to ask you to accept that this is how fp works.”
So maybe they will come up with something...

Just a cheap chinese DMW-DCC8 coupler.

Sigma also reads this topic for firmware feedback and I think they are doing a great job improving the camera
Lets stop talking about black magic as a company in this sigma topic.
. 

Hey Andrew I'm actually happy with all the technical talk here, because with the input technical users give to sigma,
It is improving things in the firmware, like the flickering and the exposure preview problem.
Please let us bitch a bit more until those issues are all sorted. 😎
And yes lets make separate tread about resolve DNG no problem with that.
 
 
 

Your 640ISO doesn't flicker. That's correct right? I need to redo mine to double check that 320 was doing it all the time but 400 was the trigger factor on my camera.
I think there are ways you can get around purple/green and most of them, like BMD Film, involve crushing the shadows and possibly desaturating them,  so they're not so obvious. @Lars Steenhoff suggested incorrect black levels but it's not that. I suspect ACES is crushing a bit and an IR Cut filter may leech some colour out overall, you could desaturate the shadows in Resolve.
The blotchiness is a factor of 10 bit shadows, each one of those blotches is a single shadow value. In most codecs and compressed formats you would never see this because noise is breaking it all up! But uncompressed shows you what's really there and of course you can add noise to break up the blotches should you want too.
I don't want to keep repeating because i will sound like a broken record but if you take a 12 bit file and a 10 bit file that has the same grey point then what you will see in terms of actual finite values are:
Stop 0 : 1 value
Sopt 1 : 2 values
Stop 2 : 4 values
Stop 3 : 8 values
Stop 4 : 16 values
Okay, if 10 bit and 12 bit have the same 18% exposure brightness level (they do, in the DNG) what the 12 bit is giving you are 2 more stops of shadows. So a value in 10 bit which is at stop 2 is 4 values but that same stop in 12 is 16 values. This is why, when you compare 10 bit to 12 bit (look at my lens images) the shadows in the 12 bit are not blotchy, but a lot more tonality. Now if i pushed 12 bit a further two stops then i would see similar blotchiness but the colours are more accurate (not green/magenta)
I hope that makes sense to anyone still wrapping their head around things....
cheers
Paul
 

Yes, I am on the latest firmware. The notes only mention that they fixed the first frames being enlarged.
I have 3D printed a cheap viewfinder attachment that works with a 3.2" Display Loupe you can find on ebay for 20€. I don't know how long it will last but right now it sits pretty tight. It locks into the small vent holes at the top and you can still use all the buttons.
If anyone is interested, message me and I can send you the blender file.
 
 

The fp has some interesting ISO behaviors, certainly!

I've been using it at lower ISOs even in the dark and then pushing things 2.7 stops without major issues. It's truly a form of night vision. Shooting wide open at F1.4 helps as well, but consider this example of a quick night shot I did:
First shot is at ISO 320 pushed 2.7 stops, second shot is ISO 2500 as-is, third shot is ISO 320 pushed 2.7 stops again, and the last shot is ISO 2500 as-is.

The original video file straight out of Resolve can be found here to avoid seeing the recompression macro blocking artifacts from YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Fopen%3Fid%3D1sEtAlhfZOjfHO7R7XmXrJJvMUiJqRAHC&event=video_description&v=vYpPZPCWo5g&redir_token=-6uwx0ZKXpomIasN7CDyU0Ps-m98MTU4NDAzNTQzNkAxNTgzOTQ5MDM2

Hey y'all! After a long time playing and testing, I made a flowchart that guides you through the process of buying scopes. This is mainly aimed at beginners, but I'm hoping it can at least be fun for experienced shooters too. I'd love to hear your thoughts!
http://www.tferradans.com/blog/?p=15998
Thanks!

Okay, so you're right - there's something going on here. Although my 800 is stable and i got a quick flicker in 400, just once at the start of recording. There was a fix to the original firmware that 'stopped' something that sounded like this. But clearly hasn't. Although it's not something i've seen in the footage i've shot - so i can't say it's always happening.
I've gone to the source of the files and i believe there's some scaling to the channels that is the cause, in which case there's hope to fix the data before debayer if it has caused a problem.
In the DNG's there is a value called black level, which is subtracted from the image. I see different minimum values for this across two DNGs and i can compensate for that in RAW Digger to see. Even doing that i believe there is a scale going on with the channels.
If it's something that can be sorted it would be best to sort this before debayer in the RAW DNG files.
I will have a word with them to add to any other reports sent.
What we should work out are the circumstances under which the camera does this...
cheers
Paul
EDIT: So i've passed on the files to sigma and see what they say. Useful for others that have similar files to do the same.
 

It feels like bashing Andrew is a new sport? He is controversial for sure, but guys... it are his top cameras of the year 2014? Why are people arguing over this nonsense when this is subjective thing? If Andrew states that the 1DC is his camera of the year it his genuine thing to do so - you dont have to agree. Just build your own top list.

The Interview has now got a limited release and is expected to be shown on Sony owned VOD channel Crackle. With the intervention of the US government, Seth Rogen is now the poster-child for freedom of expression.
First of all Crackle's the wrong place for this trash. Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee, Jerry Seinfeld, that's the Crackle target audience, much better. Their regular audience is not dumb, not one whooping at butt jokes, jokes belittling race, jokes belittling gays, jokes encouraging bullying and racism in the guise of humour, which essentially is what I think The Interview boils down to, in a similar vein to The Hangover Part 2.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
"When the monkey nibbles on the weaner, it's funny in any language" - The Hangover, Part II
What I discover when I talk to the mainstream about these films and Seth Rogan's brand of humour is that so many people just don't spot the jingoistic nastiness in these films nor the blatant racism. This really baffles me, why can't they see it? Perhaps they've never travelled or fallen in love with another culture that isn't their own. Different cultures have different sensibilities. What's not offensive to Americans might be much more offensive to everyone else.
When a country is trying to improve ties with a rogue state in order to diffuse tension and to eventually shut down their nuclear weapons programme, the last thing you want is a film like The Interview and the potentially unpredictable consequences, not least for Sony.
Creative freedom is worth defending, the question is whether the 'creative freedom of Seth Rogen' is worth defending? Look at the early reviews for The Interview & the trailer, it's not hard to work out what it is. There's plenty of nasty passive aggressive stuff in it disguised as humour, pointed out in these reviews from people who HAVE seen the film -
"Kim loves basketball - with the hoops lowered so he can dunk"
"Much is made of Koreans rumoured to be starving to death."
"Franco mugs shamelessly to make sure we understand that he's being funny, which he's not, and the script as a whole turns a satirical - or at least farcical - premise into sour buffoonery."
"It feels as though the filmmakers targeted North Korea, one of the world's least-loved countries, because no one important would object to their mocking, almost sadistic treatment of its leader."
"If the would-be butt jokes and gay jokes were funnier, I'd be willing to let it slide, but they are not."
It's the ultimate sign of our times that this is now a film President Obama has ended up defending, championing it as an example of freedom of expression, but then he's been put in a difficult situation as well.
If he rewards the hackers by backing Sony's original decision not to show it, more hacks and cyberterrorism will be encouraged because they will have the scent of a reward, an incentive to try. If he does fight back and reverse Sony's decision to show the piece of trash, that's hardly a "win" for anyone either.
The political circus around this is more ridiculous than anything because it implies that under freedom of expression, filmmakers have no responsibilities whatsoever. We do. We can't be as offensive as we want with a major release and cause dangerous diplomatic tensions under the banner of 'creative freedom' and butt jokes. With power goes responsibility and Sony Pictures need to take some responsibility for the mess and damage as well rather than blaming it entirely on North Korea.
It's not fair to say "it's only a joke" when there's undertones of Western supremacism all the way through the film. The joke about the basketball hoops needing to be lowered isn't about North Korea, it's about a race of people, that the filmmakers get a kick out of portraying as weird small people who speak funny...guys this isn't humour, it's bullying and something that reinforces plenty of real world bullying in every school in the west.
The Interview was always going to be a blatant publicity stunt designed to stir up a diplomatic rift between the US and North Korea and Sony should never have green-lit it. The irony is The Interview is exactly the kind of trash Sony producers in the leaked emails were so keen to stop doing.
Finally, here's a quote from the review in Time Out New York - "The Interview confirms Rogen as the most ambitious mainstream comedian in Hollywood. In the unlikely event that it proves to be Sony's downfall, at least they'll go out with a bang."
Not so unlikely... and really? Was it all worth it for some crass jokes at the expense of Asians and gays?

No Apple snobbery here at all.
 
If you look at a selection of high end Android phones (which by the way are half the price of the Panasonic) they're all outstanding as smartphones by comparison. Better screens, more responsive, better build quality, better music quality, much thinner and above all nicer to feel and to use.
 
There's some superb Android stuff out there... Samsung S5, OnePlus One, HTC One M8, all half the price and doubly better as smartphones than the CM1!
 
If you haven't tried the CM1 vs the other high end Android smartphones you're not best placed to comment.
 
My review would have been the same if you substitute the iPhone for a OnePlus One. It's not 'Apple snobbery' to make clear where one device is superior over another. It's called 'reviewing'.
 
It just so happens the iPhone 6 Plus is what I use so that's my frame of reference... yours may differ.

Yes it is now averaging 95mbits for me.  Seems to be even more detail now, even in the shadows.  Need to test it out more, but there is more detail, especially in the 4K Photo modes.