Jump to content

Santiago de la Rosa

Members via Facebook
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Santiago de la Rosa

  1. Hello all, I have been in Scotland for a week, what a beautiful country and people and I just want to share some pics and a short video playing with the very cheap 16-50PZ.

    All auto WB, 0 Sat, -10NR, +1 Contrast and 6ºHue.

    Video is just 7 seconds in Waverley Station testing autofocus. NX500 Hack NX-KS 140Mbps

    https://drive.google.com/open?id=107TcnejXJJDhx8RpX4SGEc9lg2OFUe3z

    All colour in camera, no post.

    SAM_3518.JPG

    SAM_3659.JPG

    SAM_3699.JPG

    SAM_3702.JPG

  2. Well... still waiting, I can log in but I can´t post or see any attachment.

    This is the message when I log in:

    jamel56, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

    Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?

    If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

  3. 4 hours ago, Jacek said:

    Sense :). I don't care if anybody agrees, just telling what I think based on my knowledge.

    Overclocking is not disaster, but increasing risk of failure from for example 0.1% to 1%, which is significant, but not observed often (but still 99% of overclockers will say it's all ok).

    Overclocking:

    - increases risk of CPU, Motherboard failure and shortens their life time.

    - increases rate of memory errors, some of them resulting in OS instability (part of Windows blue screens in old days or sudden restarts).

     

    Look here (in other articles from other years you have different motherboards):

    http://www.hardware.fr/articles/954-2/cartes-meres.html

    Failure rate of motherboards for overclockers is many times higher in comparison to regular motherboards (despite higher price, golden pins, radiators and others). It is not because these motherboards are worse than their cheaper alternatives, they are just usually working with overclocked CPU/Memory. If you look in other articles from other months/years you can find tens of such examples.

     

    I don't have time for other arguments, just do a research if you are interested. (If that's an argument :)- I'm not complete layman, have some background to judge facts - MSc in Physics and MSc in Computer Science [both on Polytechnic - more hardware related]).

     

    But please avoid arguments like: My 3 PCs are working great, so i'm sure it's safe. Probably 95% or something Overclocked PC-s are working quite well, but it's not what I'm talking about.

    Judge facts like this only based on statistics data, because we are talking about risk, which is statistics itself.

    It´s not that simple, overclock has its risk of course, but that link it´s just for % of returned components. There are normal % as other type of electronics devices as Tv´s, phones or cameras.

    ASRock 1,45% (contra 1,91%)

    ASUS 1,90% (contra 1,96%)

    Gigabyte 1,92% (contra 1,90%)

    MSI 2,36% (contra 2,20%)

    Nothing overclocked related.

    And my argument it´s not "My 3 PCs are working great", as I have said, it´s not that simple, I have been doing overclock since K7 Athlon 800 (2000 year I think) and I have worked more than 15 years in systems and hardware.

    Overclock is risky if you don´t know how to set up cooler and power, nothing more.

    Today is really simple, lot of information in forums and electronics are made with more margin and quality controls.

    Returning to Ryzen, here my numbers in Cinebench R15

     

    Cinebenh Ryzen 3.7.jpg

  4. I have run all my PC overclocked since... (can´t remember :))

    It´s 1.25v at 3.7Ghz 8cores, with offset, going 0.485v in idle, that´s nothing, temperatures are excellent so noise too.

    I´m testing now 3.8Ghz no high gain, and my chip needs 1.30v, it gives me only +1point in Cinebench.

    Stability is solid rock, +4 hours Realbench, windows too, just installed the AMD Ryzen Energy plan.

    0 problems.

    Durability? My last PC was from 3.4Ghz to 4.2Ghz since 2011, 0 problems. Now it´s working for other person.

    Ryzen 1700 gives us a 8 core for the masses.

  5. Ryzen 1700 mounted, right now overclocked to 3,7Ghz all cores. 35ºC idle, 50-55ºC rendering. It´s really faster than my i7 2600K overclocked to 4,2Ghz.

    1610 Points Cinebench R15. I will be editing next week with a new project, more conclusions to come.

    I´m very satisfied.

    Noctua NH-U12S AM4

    Gskill tridentz 3000-cl14 2x8gb overclocked to 3200 cl14

    Ryzen 1700 overclocked to 3700Mhz all cores

    Asus X370 Prime Pro bios 0614

×
×
  • Create New...