ken
-
Posts
573 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by ken
-
how about this? looks a good deal. it should be better than ISCO project lens(golden one). I think the seller did not like to ship world wide, so the price lower.
-
IMO, I don't think it worth. I think after removing coat, it is unable to keep the sharpness.
-
This one sold last night might be reasonable price? Or good deal? http://www.ebay.com/itm/390822040588
-
http://www.ebay.com/itm/271462362630 I think it is overpriced.
-
I only like my ELMOSCOPE-II. That is the only distance marks by metric system I found. I am not familiar with English system. :)
-
I think you need to wait for this one being sold first. http://www.ebay.com/itm/221413593745
-
Most recent sold one found, too expensive. http://www.ebay.com/itm/201057131268
-
Is it same as 16h?
-
What lens can take wider angle without barrel distortion? I saw 16h, or LA7200 even worse.
-
I think 2x is correct. But we cannot reach to infinity to test. So usually should use 1.9x to unsqueezed. Here is sample as 1.9x. Original 1500x1000, 1000/1.9=526. so final size is 1500x526. Found center is the least anamorphic, image in sides are more like 2x. Also post a flare test, not strong is known fact. But still can use to adjust alignment.
-
Found one said 1.7x now. http://www.ebay.com/itm/121315341670 Any idea?
-
I did some research before. Basically 70(80)-200(210) lens (equ 35mm) should work. As a cheap manual lens, Nikon AI-S 50-135 is the one, non rotating front glass, if I remembered. For APS-C, Tokina 50-135 f2.8 is best with auto focus. For M43, Panasonic 35-100 F2.8 is the one.
-
The test was using Canon 6D with EF 85mm f1.8 lens, auto focus. Actually is semi auto focus, the anamorphic lens needs to do manual focus. BTW, this lens I have seen some seller said as 2x, 1.9x or even 1.7x. But I found the actual rate is around 1.9x might be the most close ratio. original 100% crop
-
if you mean to unscrew the very tight one, see pictures what I did.
-
IMO, my method is way better mounting than the "standard way". '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>
-
Same concept as equ FL,I just use FF to say to avoid confuse.
-
IMO, looks like no better than Isco integrated project lens, in terms of optics and wide angle. The Isco lens can go with 85mm in FF. This lens looks need above 135mm in FF.
-
With this ISCORAMA, still need to adjust both focus? Is it single focusing possible? If no, which ISCORAMA possible, how to tell?
-
Most cmos is 3:2, but m43 is 4:3 in nature. IMO, using 2x anamorphic lens could use 4:3 mode. In 4:3 mode, you are able to use wider lens by cutting out vignetting. I have tried using 1:1 mode to get 2:1. Even wider lens, ff could use 50mm with 16h as my picture. In this way the prime lens are used center part, the best optics.
-
Most ISCO's lens has a standard 55mm thread inside. But if no thread, that is ok, you can make your clamp by multi step-up/down rings. Then you need to do some thread tapping (around 3mm). Thank Chinese seller on Ebay, we can save a lot. Some key words: tele metal hood, ??mm to ??mm step up down ring...
-
That mounting tool is too expensive to me. I like my way to mount (lock is gone, I don't need too). It is looking better and lighter. The total costs <$10.
-
Your list is not searchable from other Ebay user except Ebay.de's. Because your list said only ship to Germany. Only from your link in here I know you are selling. And only who know German can see it. If an item is listed ship to worldwide, we can search it, and the list is English. BTW, the price is still too high to me, sorry.
-
Why exclude non German? That is difficult to be sold.
-
really? I did a quick test. Looks the blue star one at the right of red one has the least reflection, should be the best. You can see each lens coating is different. Not sure which one is better. Can any one point out? Thanks.
-
Crazy. Today's new record of 16h. http://www.ebay.com/itm/321348153967
