Jump to content

etidona

Members via Facebook
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    100

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by etidona

  1. etidona
    Absolutely not. Save your money for something useful!
  2. etidona
    why every time there's something wrong in a camera the wedding market should embrace it? We are all fools? We all do only tripod shots of embalmed people? In my experience weddings are much more animated than that and rolling shutter is a serious issue.
  3. etidona
    Yes, the wedding market of 20 years ago ! :P
  4. etidona
    Not a bad idea Andrew, i second what SleepyWill wrote: Maybe one can become a 1° class user with a certain amount of likes or with you direct approval. Maybe the reader could choose if hide or show the 2° class posts/comments, or there could be 2 sections of the forum: one where only 1°class users can post, and one open to all. I think the moderator thing is not effective because the moderator can filter the rough, off topic or offensive posts, but cannot make a selection based on the interestingness.
  5. etidona
    I think the most part of the positive press we are reading around are sincere and not "hype". Most of us canon lenses owners are a bit scared of the incoming change. I tell you that: the only way we can save our beloved lenses is if Canon wakes up with something very new and very well priced.
  6. etidona
    The "I have canon lenses" argument is not an argument IMO. You can sell them! And when Andrew said his review are objective?
  7. etidona
    Too much numbers for my tastes: someone could please verify if the downscaled version grades better than the original?
  8. etidona
    I second Bioskop. You probably are confusing noise with the blotchiness of the codec, which is more evident in blurry images.
  9. etidona
    I don't know, it's very very detailed (zeiss helps here) but has a bit too much aliasing compared to the gh4, and some extra noise for a S35 sensor. Still looking for a real gh4 competitor ;)
  10. etidona
    unable to download/watch the file, I just see a fixed image of something very blurry
  11. etidona
    Is not? So why they pushed out the a7s before being capable of internal 4k?
  12. etidona
    And in the "power zoom" thing. and in the constant aperture...
  13. etidona
    Still don't know which will be the best deal, but one thing is for sure: Time to sell your 5d3 or C-wathever. :D
  14. etidona
    External only 4k is disappointing. The 28-135 f/4 in development is very interesting, we have nothing similar for the gh4, too bad we don't know when all that sensitivity with that lens will be in the stores!
  15. etidona
    Thank you as always for your work Andrew! One question: in my experiments with Pana G and Canon EOS the ISO settings over different cameras don't match perfectly. It's the same with the gh4 and 5d3? I mean at the same iso is one brighter than the other or are they roughly the same? Would be nice to see the same test ungraded too! :D
  16. etidona
    Every JVC GY howner knows that CCD is a joy. Great video and great location!
  17. etidona
    Canon has been smart enough to think at the market niche that buys more stuff and that doesen't care spending $3k more for a comfortable workflow: wedding videographers. Internal ND and Mic alone makes me slant for the eventual C200 over the gh4. It is worth extra 3k? If it makes the difference between doing simple and easy shots and changing 10 ND filters per day manually (and keeping it clean and scratch free), or loosing audio because of the mic off for 3 months consecutively, or looking like ropocop in a church.... yes it's worth it.
  18. etidona
    Stunning video, very emotional! love everything, also the music is great!
  19. etidona
    From what I've seen in the net the BM looks to have more DR. I't also smaller and lighter. However the m43 solution have less DOF, more wide angle options, smaller file size, 50, 60 and 96p, very good low light performance, better usability and of course, if you consider to use it in the future, 4k. Good luck with the choice! ;)
  20. etidona
    I appreciate you criticism as exposed in the last post. In the first one was just offensive. By the way my test reflects my needs that can be different from yours. I don't care matching exposures, i just need to know which camera will give me the more usable image in low light.
  21. etidona
    Sorry, fixed :D
  22. etidona
    Video updated with much more pleasant manual white balance in the Canon. But the exposure and noise issues are still there ;)
  23. etidona
    Please guys! I always set the white manually when I work. In this test I didn't because I didn't care. There are so many aspects to consider when evaluating a camera and I wanted to focus only in sensitivity.
  24. etidona
    I will ASAP, at this point I' m curious to see what changes in practical terms. For now please take it also as an auto white balance test :-D
  25. etidona
    Do you own test and stop trolling. True, I didn't set WB manually because my aim was to compare noise levels at high ISO. I know this test is unusable for evaluating color rendition, but I think it shows fairly well the noise. I'll do a better one when Silvia will bring her camera again! ;)
×
×
  • Create New...