Emanuel

PS — Just to answer someone else out there to whom I’ve sent this link: Nothing against it looking like video, if so. Video is cinema : P If this means looking like it was made for the big screen in terms of narrative — well, docs are usually made in a different form. But docs are also cinema ; ) That narrative form, usually made for the big screen, can also be reached through distinct ingredients such as cadence, dynamic range, lighting, framing and their respective language each element carries. Not to mention editing, pacing, sound design, and how it all aligns with intention. That is, further to that — narrative intent doesn’t depend solely on medium or format. Whether fiction or documentary, cinema arises from how all elements are orchestrated: rhythm, texture, spatial composition, sonic atmosphere. The so-called 'cinematic look' is less about resolution or gear and more about coherence — how lighting interacts with story, how movement informs meaning, how editing shapes perception. A documentary can be just as evocative, immersive, and crafted for the big screen as any scripted film — sometimes more so, precisely because it plays with reality through an authored lens. Think of the slow-burn, meditative tempo of Chantal Akerman’s News from Home, or the hyper-composed observational poetics of Gianfranco Rosi’s Notturno and Fire at Sea — all undeniably cinematic. Or the emotional montage and reflexive voiceover of Agnès Varda in Les glaneurs et la glaneuse, merging essay film and personal documentary with formal invention. Even in cinéma vérité — like Frederick Wiseman’s institutional portraits — the framing, duration, and soundscape create a cinematic rhythm far beyond "capturing reality." Lars von Trier’s The Idiots (Idioterne) and one of my favourite ever (as you well know ; ) offers another perspective on cinematic form, blending the boundaries between staged drama and spontaneous behavior. Shot with a raw immediacy and handheld style that can resemble documentary, it challenges traditional narrative structures and pushes cinema toward an exploration of social taboos and collective behavior. The film’s use of naturalistic lighting and unpolished texture contributes to its unsettling, immersive atmosphere, underscoring how cinematic expression can emerge from both form and content in provocative ways. Closer to us ; ) Portuguese cinema brings its own deep contributions to this idea of documentary as cinema. Pedro Costa’s Vitalina Varela or No Quarto de Vanda / In Vanda’s Room unfold in shadow and stillness, shaped more by presence than plot — fiction and documentary blending until the line dissolves. And Manoel de Oliveira — whose films stand almost outside time — gave us a cinema where documentary, poetry, theatre and metaphysics cohabit the frame, inviting reflection instead of reaction. Also worth noting in the video I’m commenting on here (shot on the Panasonic G7 with cheap C mount glass such as Kern Pizar 26mm f/1.9 and Cosmicar 12.5mm f/1.9 lenses) is the distinctive grain structure — a tactile, organic texture that enhances its cinematic feel. This film grain, far from being a flaw, enriches the image’s atmosphere and adds depth to the visual narrative, demonstrating how video can carry a rich, sensory cinematic language all its own. All this just to say: the tools of cinema aren’t bound to fiction, nor to any one format. If it resonates, constructs space, breathes rhythm, and asks something of the viewer — it’s cinema, regardless of whether it was shot on film, video, or through a window.

That's what I always say to my people… This camera is a gem. Lets you use unique glass that’s nearly impossible to mount on anything else unless another MFT format device but what cam? ; ) This is what cinema is made of — and still made with ;- )

Love this camera! : ) Right now, I have a crew to start working with my arsenal based on 4x units... What C mount lenses used there?

We live all in a weird world today but blame Marvel! LOL ; ) EAG :- )

We have today a new sub-forum expressly open by our webmaster in order to include this niche as many others of similar kind. Have you already noticed it? https://www.eoshd.com/comments/forum/38-gimbal-dji-drone-action-cameras/ I believe once up now by Andrew, it would be nice to have a few selection of these threads moved to there instead? If not for anything else, it might help to establish a new trend and become people here used to visit the sub-forum too, increase the visibility and diversify the offer for valuable information on topic.

We’ve been using AI intensively lately in all aspects of business and this industry too, and I’m still amazed at how much it contributes to putting food on the table for all of us. This isn’t about violating copyright, but rather about using AI with goodwill — it serves people and helps generate income for our families and coworkers. A dream made real. Fits creation. It doesn’t serve (at least to me) to replace anyone or anything (far from it!). I don’t need to see much to get that. On the contrary, we now have an army at our service ; ) When in good hands, there’s really not much doubt about this new kid on the block. I guess no producer is refusing these precious hands and brains. I confess, I love tools! And no less, what people can do with them! ;- ) - EAG

No, not were, oh gosh, they still are: https://vimeo.com/channels/staffpicks Here's one (perfectly random), just added 10 days or a week ago: Use a VPN or proxy tool as add-on to your browser... Looks like they serve not only to China! As easy as the need for a cup of water! : ) Andrew is right, they look like to play pranks on us but there should be some sorta legal background to their idea of blocking it in certain regions such as EU, I'm afraid. We may become a Soviet Union, full of regulations like Pink Floyd's two lost souls in a fishbowl or such as the 1:30 rule for leverage on financial markets to only mention in specific a single example versus the world outside 'the West'... : X Go figure, U.S. is not better now with China playing the part of the free market's best friends... We live all in a comedy, no many doubts out here. For some reason Brexit happened... ; ) Later on, don't blame the messenger! ;- ) I wonder if Putin would ever have invaded Ukraine in the way he did three years ago... We should never show our weaknesses. Not underrate who don't like or compete with us. Rule number one and rule number two :- ) - EAG

I already do it daily, just not here... ; ) Well, I think it's natural Andrew has a scope for his forum on his favourite tools. Nothing against, I actually share his love as I'm sure everyone here do. The fact we have now a sub-forum especially dedicated to these other tools only bring those people there really interested to look for information on them, so I believe such approach ends helpful. So far, a new thread I started here 24 hours ago has only about 1/6 of the views compared to one in the main section. It really narrows down the audience to those specifically interested in these tools, which is kind of a bonus. Yet regarding your comment about energy drinks, I suggest it’s better to finish with water instead ;- )

This is coming from another thread: «You can (...) adjust the depth and spatial feel to match your subject, scene, or even your own natural IPD. Reflect how you see the world or push it into a more artistic or exaggerated direction. The Flex mod unlocks new creative freedom without the cost or complexity of professional cinema rigs.» «But that’s not all. The Q3U VR180 Flex allows you to adjust the IPD mid-shot, introducing a new visual language in immersive filmmaking. Just like pulling focus or zoom in traditional cinematography, pulling IPD can now be used as a powerful creative tool.» Here is: https://deovr.com/blog/211-introducing-the-q3u-vr180-flex

I believe this is a balanced approach, it clarifies the main topics for discussion and directs attention where it’s most needed. Here’s a somewhat random mix of a few threads on topic beyond the typical action camera I think it could be moved to this new sub-forum: https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/35063-aerial-phototography-rules-for-the-use-of-light-devices/ https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/39684-dji-mavic-mini-just-landed/ https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/89481-dji-mini-4-pro-obstacle-avoidance/ https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/40988-180-vr-immersive-film-making/ https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/75642-dji-pocket-3/#comment-578334 https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/84829-osmo-pocket-3-2-questions-about-filters https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/84770-osmo-pocket-3-gimbal-problem-help https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/84566-dji-osmo-pocket-3-or-dji-action-4-for-me https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/87555-osmo-pocket-3-o-sony-rx-100-v https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/69798-the-best-smalllight-gimbal https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/90169-nimble-gimbal-suggestions https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/90138-smartphone-camera-module-with-a-100mp-43-sensor https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/88537-4k-120fps-is-now-on-iphone/ https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/89860-vivo-x200-pro/ There are many others like this specific one where new add-on has popped up here — not yet posted, I guess: https://www.eoshd.com/comments/topic/88502-qoocam-3-ultra-360º-camera-with-8k-10bit-color-and-4k120fps/ ...but now, here is: https://www.facebook.com/silverqsy/posts/pfbid0hgWfVGeiLXuEpbRNChU8xGWuAjndXdh9s62rCwGA3afj5WiMMnEGiRsUDkvKshR7l

There's also something else to add as point I guess, the fact they tend to each year launch a new version à la GoPro business model and they're not always a jump as far as specs/performance concerns. Despite the fact sometimes they bring some valuable tool as said above — it's the case of X5 this year, as for instance. Osmo Pocket 3 is yet another (revolutionary) case study... (I seriously don’t get how every member here keeps forgetting to carry a unit — especially considering it should be second nature to pocket it as soon as we stand up!) and IMHO is not even an action camera... (well, DJI has named another series on purpose, so I guess I am not so distant from reality). Without mention, it's all about the content produced, no less : ) 360º or even 180º VR cameras can often be used as action cams, but that’s not their primary purpose I tend to see. Stereo 3D is there to remind us (they’re not listed up there, so I guess they don’t really fit in this category ; ) Still, it makes sense to include the 360º devices here, as they now fall within the scope of the discussion. A single thread is useful to not spread too much in many directions when the debate on these small devices can be focused and enriched here. Even though drones are somewhat related for their most frequent users, they’re still a separate focus of attention as matter of fact. They could be excluded from this discussion due to factors like legal implications, only to provide an example of something not necessarily related to this subject. Plus IIRC there’s already sufficient information on them here too. If the idea is to place it as action cam style filmmaking/shooting, I think it makes all the sense to gather all together in the same place. Let alone it’s the webmaster’s call in the end so everything’s in order, we have a unique spot/thread to safely post it now :- ) - EAG

WTH of a combo! 56 grams + 1/1.7-inch CMOS sensor delivering 4K video at up to 120 frames per second... https://dlmag.com/dji-osmo-nano-leak-reveals-ultra-compact-action-camera-set-to-revive-modular-design/

I will probably add this one to come now when I have a 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 [tiptop AF & breathing as well 6-stops @16mm & 4.5-stops @300mm stabilization performance*] for day light, paid last Thursday and scheduled to just arrive by this June 2... *These tests serve as example why new releases can bring a whole difference working out as useful add-on to your arsenal... A bit more of love spread wherever fits wouldn't hurt ; ) No use of primes match the resource of zoom lenses and how handy they are. Fast glass is not everything in life, even though their blesses I also stand as irresistible indeed. Go figure to couple a lightweight zoom range like this one is.

I clicked, ended there:

Why fake? I don't get... Sounds legit question. FX30 all way round exactly for the reasons pointed out above. Used less than 24 hours ago. Practically in a daily basis BTW. The options for lenses are a must. Handling new & affordable anamorphic AF glass these days. Combo works like a charm! :- ) Sirui 20mm T/1.8 shot on FX30 (from native 4K50p 10-bit 4:2:2 SOOC with AI removal*) May 25, 2025

With love for Kieślowski's legacy, it can only end as a good sign from... there's still hope, after all ; ) And here's an interesting link to an entry by Andrew: https://www.eoshd.com/news/dont-panic-about-ai-its-just-a-tool/

Indeed. I agree with you. Exactly my point about AI : ) It can be beneficial when helps. When replaces, however... For art? No way. This doesn't mean something hybrid but it is up to the driver to choose when yes and when not. And assume the consequences of the choices made. Revolutionary but always for good and bad as all revolutions are or become. - EAG

I still hold three units of them! And 4x Canon M... 4x G7... 2x GF5... 1x 5DMII -- not mirrorless but anyway, today, it is my precious one for absolute personal reasons, hence the exception here! (actually, it was my last reflex before to have changed to mirrorless) 1x GX85... 1x FZ1000... A couple of NX500. Other than a few Blackmagic if those aka cinema cameras count here, FX30 is my daily one nowadays : ) All of them have a particular story of and by their own! Loved the way you've addressed about, as our pets! LOL : ) you've exactly nailed it, I guess why we are all here! :- )

oh God, that's beautiful! < 3 What an artist we have there! We need more stuff of this! : ) Who cares about new features when the old ones are already prone to shine? : P We need shooters and art coming from, not much else...

Absolutely! : ) When not dizzying... I appreciate Andrew is opening this thread for this topic anyway. They can be different things... It's the shooter, folks! ;- )

Usually, action camera footage is crap. This doesn't mean the device itself is. Neither the possibilities we can get from. The fact the lowest price the more wider the basis of the users' skills is. A bit like audiences. You extend the range you'll lower the quality of your outcome, no many options ;- ) - EAG

The best cam is the one you bring and can shoot with. No other camera industry segment has so many upgrades as this one from so many sources. Finally, a place here where we can post it without feeling or sound intrusive in the middle of our sacred college of filmmakers. EAG :- )

As FX30 owner, no way to ignore it... For some reason they haven't called it FX3B ; )

It's not a Lumix but such a shy update FX3 killer! : D Just arrived... FX3A, here's a crucial breakdown (from this source) : Key Differences (FX3A vs FX3) LCD Screen: The most significant change is an upgraded rear LCD screen. The original FX3 featured a screen with approximately 1.44 million dots. The new FX3A incorporates a higher-resolution LCD with approximately 2.36 million dots, the same used in the FX30. This should provide a sharper and more detailed image for monitoring and menu navigation. USB Port: Some sources indicate the FX3A features a more standardized USB-C connection, potentially replacing an older USB 3.2 Gen 1 port on the original FX3. This aims to improve compatibility with modern accessories and streamline workflows. Included Charger: The FX3A is reported to ship with a dual battery charger (BC-QZ1), an improvement over the single-slot charger that came with the original FX3. Removed Features: Some minor, largely defunct features like the infrared remote function and NFC may have been removed in the FX3A. Excluded Accessories: The FX3A reportedly no longer ships with a USB-C cable or power cord. Price: There are indications that the FX3A might have a higher price point (around $4500 in the USA) due to new tariff rules, though this can vary by region and retailer. Some UK retailers list it around £3,599.00. $3,899.99 https://electronics.sony.com/imaging/interchangeable-lens-cameras/all-interchangeable-lens-cameras/p/ilmefx3a

Absolutely. If poorly used, it will look like complete crap. This technology should remain a pure add-on. Otherwise, think of it like an anti-inflammatory drug—it can save your life, but it can also be dangerous, even fatal. What I appreciate here is the return to the written word. Writing for cinema is coming to life again. Repetition is nonsense—hence the earlier example of Marvel, and similarly with certain stylistic formulas. This discussion hasn't positively popped up with AI... I’m not aware of Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s engagement with AI... He is clearly the Antonioni of today. But he is not Antonioni. Yet you’ll find Antonioni’s trace in his cinema, without him being a mere imitator of one of the greatest masters in the history of film. But seen as his inheritor. Both can achieve equal greatness, without one diminishing the other. No idea if anyone else has ever connected one with the other, but let me make my disclaimer: I certainly won’t be paying ANY royalties to anyone who might have written the same thing before me. For one simple reason—I also NEVER read it anywhere; I actually arrived at this conclusion strictly on my own.* Among many other influences, of course. It might even seem odd to bring his work into this thread right now, but I’ll say it without fear—I’m totally confident no one’s going to claim there’s any AI intervention going on here made or released in 2006... only artistic influences and that’s a whole different story, yup! BTW his actress and wife is with no qualification hard to add, so simply amazing, not only in my eyes and to my knowledge... She is also a director but above all a writer (Ebru Ceylan), however, her husband has a lot of him in her work too... (two only feature films as actress, oh God, does it make her less gorgeous actress?!) and in that role in specific now, as for instance! ...without ever overshadowing (or killing in the context of our discussion along this thread ; ) her gift. A few creators have impressed me so much as her performance in that particular work but credits to her husband as accomplice for that outcome. What a team! Both as sorta combo (the couple) shine even further rather than alone one or the other (the curious part is the movie plot and the stuff either Antonioni or Ceylan operate around and about). A parenthesis for the geeks and those who complain about the flaws of the current or early technology releases : D this eternal materpiece was mainly shot on good old 8-bit 3:1:1 1440x1080... I wonder if this artistic outcome or endeavor would have been possible to bring one to two decades before. We need a budget for filmmaking and not only cameras BTW : X A bit the way I see AI can work out in good hands ; ) In a word? Layers. The multiple the best. Even though, the less the better : P It's a hell of a balance hard to make, oh yeah, count on it! I will leave here an example. I asked to ChatGPT about my English here, before a few changes introduced by me in the meantime... : D and the winner (result) is: "By the way, his actress and wife is—without exaggeration—simply incredible, not only in my eyes but in my understanding. She’s also a director, but above all a writer (Ebru Ceylan). Yet her husband’s influence is undeniably present in her work too, without ever overshadowing or diminishing her gift. Together, they shine even brighter—a synergy that, to me, reflects how AI can work beautifully in good hands." I took that 'a' (before 'director' and 'writer') and robbed the word 'overshadowing' I have applied in my text. And have learnt it is better to use some punctuation mark (—) you'll start to see in my posts because I also agree it can fit more a common pattern (ah, the usual standards!) than the one (--) I am used to. Other than that, I stand with my original text. Should I feel or infer that have I stolen anything to anyone and pay royalties for that? ; ) https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/ https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/photography/earlyphotographs1.php https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/photography/turkeycinemascope1.php https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/photography/inanotherplace1.php https://www.nuribilgeceylan.com/photography/formyfathertexteng.php BTW part III, nature is a bastard... His father's face looks like the filmmaker himself! Maybe some time machine over there? LOL ; ) Well, straight on topic, for some good reason I'd like to end this post of mine with this line ;- ) * Funny, out of curiosity, I asked to ChatGPT with this paragraph if someone else had said the same in the past, here's the answer (haha looks like if I had to pay anyone, it’d be the auteur himself, I posed my observation which led to such a 'gross' statement of mine among others bien sûr): «Regarding your comparison between Nuri Bilge Ceylan and Michelangelo Antonioni, you're in good company. Ceylan has acknowledged Antonioni as a significant influence on his work. For instance, in an interview, Ceylan mentioned that Antonioni's films like L'Eclisse, L'Avventura, and La Notte inspired him during his formative years as a filmmaker. Critics have also noted the stylistic and thematic parallels between the two directors, particularly in films like Climates, where Antonioni's influence is evident in the exploration of alienation and the use of visual composition. Sources: SCREENVILLE + erajournal.co.uk So, while you're not the first to draw this connection, your perspective adds to the appreciation of Ceylan's work and its cinematic lineage.» End of quote. On your quote, Eduardo, can that Cleopatra (1963) be taken as influence too instead? I am currently literally drinking every LIFE magazine work out here: https://books.google.pt/books/about/LIFE.html Just for the sake of our discussion, should I stop to do it?