-
Posts
6,831 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by Emanuel
-
Not everything is bad on internet... Imagine that, without it, I wouldn't have found this one taken a week ago on Fuji Rock Festival : D EDIT -- Sorta self-service. I don't know exactly how to call it right now in English once when I was studying it at an academic level, the terminology in my native Portuguese language was used as "saberes formais" e "saberes não formais". I guess something as 'informal knowledge' and vice versa by the reverse order. The world is leading to there. People at the academic level discuss if school/college/university, i.e. the academy won't drastically change once and forever. Perhaps at a point if won't disappear, will be replaced for places such as EOSHD forums or alike, no kiddin' : ) where knowledge may flow. The whole point is the self-regulatory role of these new communities able to serve a common and higher purpose for the benefit of all on behalf of the traditional chains of information.
-
Man looks up on a yellow sky And the rain turns to rust in his eye Rumors of his health are lies Old England is dying His clothes are a dirty shade of blue And his ancient shoes worn through He steals from me and he lies to you Old England is dying Still he sings an empire song Still he keeps his navy strong And he sticks his flag where it ill belongs Old England is dying You're asking what makes me sigh now What it is makes me shudder so well I just freeze in the wind and I'm Numb from the pummelin' of the snow That falls from high in yellow skies Down on where the well loved flag of England flies Where homes are warm and mothers sigh Where comedians laugh and babies cry Where criminals are televised politicians fraternize Journalists are dignified and everyone is civilized And children stare with Heroin eyes Old England! Evening has fallen The swans are singing The last of Sunday's bells is ringing The wind in the trees is sighing And old England is dying This is one of my fav poems... by Mike Scott from that gem-song up there : -) That said, hope no one may wonder if happens to ever be related to the country with same name : D
-
-
Speaking of 80s, here's one of my fav ones... Have had the luck to personally meet the groovy Mike, what such a musician/composer/poet 'n full artist... this man is part of many people, me included : -) Yet about characters... I see our good oldie @Ed_David has forgotten LOL : ) to post one of the best camera works (let alone the light ; ) I've ever seen in a music video by his own hands and eyes -- kudos comrade : -)
-
It depends a lot on the situation. Not jack of all trades... ; -)
-
Madonna living over here nowadays recently shot this one -- don't surely take her historical BS too serious anyway : D
-
I find the gap between ISO 1000 and 1250 much of a surprise as far as noise concerns : -) In short, why not also ETTR along the P4K as much as with the previous Blackmagic cameras? ...to combat the Sony-like colors... Loved that one! : -)
-
Little great events cam indeed... the best one IMO : ) My hat to these DJI guys : -)
-
Indeed. The same difference we'll find out between ISO 1000 and 1250...
-
Buddy, you know why you've always been one of my fav posters for years if not longer than a decade now, wherever you are ; ) a breeze welcome to any users community again, thanks to you too @Andrew Reid : -)
-
Thanks @Mattias Burling for your input but why not ETTR exactly going on P4K...? Puzzles me... : ) CS is working there, no doubts, but as Anthony posted, you blow up your results if not address any eventual trouble there with ETTR as much as the earlier models : -)
-
The fourth, first and second ones really deserve to be screened at the original resolution... great results : -)
-
I am used to get outstanding results blurring the oversharpened outcome when necessary : -)
-
Or the old Sony to be honest... ; -)
-
“GW1 is equipped with a Dual Conversion Gain (DCG) that converts the received light into an electric signal according to the illumination of the environment. This allows the sensor to optimize its full well capacity (FWC), utilizing the collected light more efficiently especially in bright environments” https://www.hindustantimes.com/tech/48mp-isn-t-enough-next-redmi-smartphone-to-feature-64mp-camera/story-pFbEtxqrre5QNprYgwBfFI.html https://www.techfoe.com/2019/07/redmi-to-soon-launch-smartphone-with.html https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/redmi-64mp-camera-smartphone-will-launch-soon-with-four-rear-cameras-xiaomi-confirms-1572804-2019-07-24
-
From actual EURGBP exchange rates, we live interesting camera pricing times nowadays especially to those outside Britain in EU as myself used to have British suppliers. Before brexit you're even still able to buy from UK with no fees extra charge. With Boris as PM, no-deal brexit becomes closer or not? https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/brexit-early-elections-coming-but-how-early-lot We're living decisive times in fact for many generations to come and not only in UK very likely, but also in general for everyone's lives, History is made today! : -)
-
That's exactly my understanding, Jonesy, as well. H.265 as H.264 successor, I see it as designed for delivery or suitable as you wish, even though, H.264 had been successfully used for video capture in most affordable devices as you Andrew accurately mention, so I follow and agree with your point too, no matter what : ) As Niels Bohr wisely told us, a vulgar truth is a premise whose contrary is a falsity when a deep truth is a premise whose opposite is also a deep truth ; ) ProRes which was previously designed for post processing, is the finest example as useful acquisition tool and popular professional video capture standard today : -)
-
Even though, a set of stronger and more efficient codecs designed for acquisition would not hurt at all... ; -)
-
I understand compression method is the best way to call it. People vulgarly call it codec as I did above : ) If you can have distinct bit rate ratios, you'll have more than one to literally define it or in a more lato sensu, a variation of them. Not really sure if we should call it in a single form, anyway. I don't see anything wrong to be hair-splitting with use of words or concepts. I think this is coming from my legal academic background at first sight : -D You our Odin @webrunner5? I don't think that Computer GPU codec vs video camera stuff applies as excuse to put Andrew to rest ; ) Even though as previously said, H.265 is merely designed for delivery, not acquisition : -)
-
Thanks for your like added, Don @webrunner5 : ) Still back to topic BTW, the problem is not exactly when there is a compromise, but when such necessary ingredients compromise quality a way further. Rather than preventing a solid post production usage range. Here's why raw or/and bit depth are priceless indeed. Without mention bit rate (E : -)
-
Right. Thanks to correct me : ) I mean, the compression scheme based there as much as raw is, when not uncompressed but finest compressed, as for example REDCODE file format is in the distinct variants. Big difference : -) The bit rate addressed to data savings goal would be pretty irrelevant if only not when the result is a compromise. As hinted above-posted, lower bit depth doesn't help either when a higher end is mandatory. E : -)
-
How's in your jurisdiction? Any personal stories of EOSHD users interesting to share with this community? Interesting episode in Brazil (sorry, only available in native Portuguese) where the bird can't be 30 meters (horizontally) nearby people for justifiable reasons : D http://g1.globo.com/bahia/bahia-meio-dia/videos/t/edicoes/v/homem-e-preso-por-importunacao-sexual-apos-filmar-mulheres-com-o-auxilio-de-um-drone/7663339/
-
Vimeo for the matter : ) But the point could be some other though. Something people don't really care and I see too little anywhere. Some stuff holds further processing pressure to next generations to come included, some others don't. That's make such a difference! : ) I'd dare to say the difference imposed by high bitrate or, for example, raw vs H.265... Let's speak it openly and very frankly, H.265 is a delivery codec, not designed for acquisition. Let alone bit depth... E : -)
-
By Jove, how can you claim that based on a single version encoded on Vimeo? It is beyond me... Let alone previous ones! That's like a whore, you can't guess where she was before : X I'd only admit this comment: certain outcome or codecs handle much better processing than the further degradation this sample shows. That one I might accept it. E : -)
