stephen

Agree. My point is that we can see for the first time FX3 and Zr image side by side. Nikon Zr image when R3D codec is used looks good.

This is an interesting approach. The DCTL basically mimics photo editing and puts all corrections in one node. It is clearly for people who don't want to go deeper in Resolve and color correction/grading in general. They also have some or a lot of Photoshop / Lightroom experience and habits. These Resolve users do exists. I was one of them many years back and I hope your DCTL would find its users. For more sophisticated users like me now and basically anybody interested in going deeper into Resovle it is too simple and lacks fine controls. For users like me and serious colorists there are many DCTLs that address the complexity problems of split toning, S curve, better contrast, film density, etc. in Resolve. They provide much finer control over each aspect of the image. Most of those DCTLs are created by professional colorists and used by other colorist and editors. I also use some of them. Mononodes DCTLs IridescentColor DCTLs PixelTools DCTLs Many free DCTLs Cullen Kelly - Contour toolset DCTLs Waqas Qazi - Qazi's Toolkit DCTLs Behind those tools also lies a methodology well explained by colorists. For me personally understanding image editing for film and video at a deeper level is much more rewarding process. Once I created my node tree and establish each aspect of the image, editing and color correction is a piece of cake. So not for me but there are people who may like your approach.

Good test and comparison with Sony FX3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCBg8Tsc7Xw

It looks like it is. It also look like original RED RAW codec doesn't show any superiority over ProRes RAW codec https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtTRoOWaw-w With ProRes RAW footage in Davinci Resolve you can choose between many Log profiles including Panasonic V-Log, Sony S-Log3, Canon C-Log2 and avoid using Nikon NLog. In this case Nikon Z6 III for me is a better camera. It has the same sensor, but also great EVF, mechanical shutter, full HDMI port. Nikon Zr main selling point is R3D NE or RED RAW lite if we can call it.

Nikon Zr uses EXPEED 7 processor same that is in Z6 III, Z8, Z9, etc. Developing a new processor is quite expensive. This basically means that Z6 III, Z8, Z9 also could receive R3D NE and LUT support via firmware update. If this happens Z6 III and Z8 will be better choices as hybrid cameras. Lets see if Nikon will do this or will keep R3D NE exclusive to Zr and future Cinema cameras. I am also interested to see how R3D NE compares to NRAW. Nikon Zr is a cool camera but agree with others - it is a strange animal. Part vlogging similar to Sony ZV-E1 part cinema camera.

Good and solid camera but nothing groundbreaking or exciting. Sensor is non stacked and slower than the one in Sony FX3. Dynamic range probably will be a bit lower as this is typical for Canon sensors. Low light won't be as good too. In general good compromise, 14ms is still good rolling shutter. Apparently same sensor will appear in Canon R6 III. It all make sense for Canon and nicely fits in their cinema line. Because of lower key sensor characteristics I don't see it as serious threat for Sony FX3. FX3 II for sure will be even better. I am curious to see if Sony A7 V will have stacked sensor as some rumors indicate or will follow Canon strategy of having 30-40 Mpx faster than A7 IV but non stacked sensor.

Yes ! Great news for all Resolve users !

Just discovered that Minolta MD 35-70mm f3.5 is parfocal. 🙂

Minolta MD 35-70mm f3.5 + Minolta MD 24-35mm f3.5. Minolta MD 35-70mm f3.5 is very good, Minolta MD 24-35mm f3.5 just OK. For video both are sharp enough,both relatively small and compact and two touch operation. Only drawback for me is that Minolta MD 35-70mm f3.5 zoom is most extended at 35mm. You can add also some of the tele zooms but they are all push pull type. IMHO using zooms would be the best approach as all brands had zooms in the f3.5 to f4 range. If you are willing to use zooms with non constant aperture you'll have much more options.

Auto focus adapters stacking - now you can use Sony and Minolta A mount lenses on Nikon Z bodies with auto focus https://nikonrumors.com/2025/06/16/megadap-to-release-a-new-etz21-pro-lens-adapter.aspx/ This Boryoza adapter claims compatibility with Sony LA-EA5 and TECHART LM-EA9 https://www.ebay.com/itm/286366368166?_skw=BORYOZA&itmmeta=01JYT46VRXBY4FAGD5NCK30AG9&hash=item42acc401a6:g:KDEAAOSwhPxnwDMQ&itmprp=enc%3AAQAKAAAAwFkggFvd1GGDu0w3yXCmi1dFj0mM6EhbKtm2lYZj5jubCkvL5au4XyCXT1PLIS%2FzhkgvvlkkxknBA%2FAZxa%2Fos4mvQSNLijTgKGBUPQ%2FVLodAnXLzlRTI2NyMDwEvsQfnatF1MapHjnn2UmaTU6beK4uTVHEKe5mWm3R2p%2BQ3%2BuEAMx0Tbe9TkLihPa3aLELvcn556rDTHU%2F6NuyQGV1Xxwz1XbjxvHGpqruu1RViXDGi5otoYXZO5BB%2Beeg2Bqm8TA%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR868m8T2ZQ Those adapters fit perfectly my strategy to have both a Sony and a Nikon camera but use mostly Sony lenses. Now this can be extended to some vintage auto focus lenses too. Cool. Sony LA-EA5 is mostly for photos One negative about Nikon Z cameras is lack of 3rd wheel in the back. According to a review I watched recently you can't reassign some of the other 2 wheels for ISO change. Changing ISO manually is not that easy compared to cameras that have a 3rd wheel.

It does of course. Resolution of the screen is low - 720x480 and it doesn't tilt. You are forced to lift 1-1.5 kg in front of your eyes and need also a LCD shade/magnifier for those sunny days. EOS M is much lighter. It is quite difficult and limiting to shoot this way and get stable footage and consistent results. I always preferred using it with an external monitor. It took me quite a lot of time to understand the simple true that my time on this earth is limited and time in general is much more valuable resource than the 1000$ difference between 5D Mark III and a decent modern camera. Agree with Al that ML is for people who like to tinker. I enjoyed doing this myself as well but now regret the wasted time. Even if they add a new camera are you willing to go through cycles of tries and errors and inevitable failures testing the hacked firmware ? I for sure am not.

Personally I don't care. But it is not OK toward EOSHD.com web site. When they post an article like this they should at least post also a link to the original publication. If they adhere to some professional standards or simple human courtesy. It is Andrew's time, effort and money that make this site and forum possible. So placing a link to original posting and forum would be the correct thing to do. Not to mention that if some of cined readers buys the EVF, and finds out it doesn't work for his camera, they would conclude they were lied by cined. Without having the full discussion here their article may be simply useless. Will double check and let you know

Those are urban legends. Every blind test I personally witnessed and those we know from youtube shows exactly the opposite. Color science, micro contrast and any other superiority claims falls short. Even professionals can't distinguish between different cameras and lenses. Like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZjIz8sB2vg Or even older and much more professional Zakuto Great Shootout from 2011. Does anybody still remember it ? Canon 5D Mark III is outdated compared to modern cameras. It is OK for fun and experimenting but that's it. 1080р is line skipped, so real resolution is somewhere around 1600px not 2K. Rolling shutter 21-22ms is OK but again far from modern standards and dynamic range is around 10.5 stops. It is a DSLR, so no EVF, you have to use external monitor. Workflow is not optimal as you need to transcode first from mlv to Cinema DNG. Compared to the low resolution, files are relatively big and take a lot of space. I don't see any reason for Magic Lantern project to exists when now we have so many cameras with internal 4K RAW Video recording.

@Noli - IMHO the other 2 buttons are none functional. I don't feel or hear any click. Original functionality of previous versions of this EVF was related to industrial instruments/devices. It was meant to be put on a protective helmet. Video input was AV. This previous version industrial EVF was fit with higher resolution sensor, HDMI input and adapted to another application - camera EVF. After your posting decided to test the EVF with other cameras. Borrowed a Sony A7CR from a friend. With this camera EVF had the same or similar problem to what you describe. Interestingly when I switch HDMI output on Sony A7CR to 1080i interlaced, there is no flickering or garbage but of course split on 2 and can see only the upper half portion. If I choose auto or 1080p - then initially picture in EVF is some flickering garbage. I have found that have to wait certain time, quite long - 5 to 7 min. After this when I switch EVF off / on picture becomes good and clear. It works as it suppose to work. If I a switch briefly camera off / then on again it still works. But if camera is switched off for longer is stops working and have to wait again. I used also external monitor with HDMI out. Camera is plugged in HDMI IN of the monitor and EVF in HDMI OUT of the monitor. It works without a problem. IMHO your conclusion that problem is related to power delivery from camera trough HDMI to EVF is correct. It is strange than after some time , EVF or Camera worms up and it works on certain cameras. Curious to see if HDMI cable with additional USB power delivery will solve problem. It won't be the best solution but at least it will work reliably. Have to warn everybody who wants to get this EVF that it doesn't work with all cameras. Guess I was lucky as it works without those problems on Sony ZV-E1.

As expected Lumix S1 II uses the same sensor as Nikon Z6 III. Panasonic apparently managed to improve on Nikon Z6 III Achilles heel - 1 stop of lower dynamic range in ISOs under 800. Lumix S1 II has DR above 12 stops at the expense of slightly slower rolling shutter. That's a good decision and achievement. We can always go to APS-C mode and have really fast 6ms rolling shutter. Price in Europe is 3500 Euro as rumors suggested. I think this is a good strategy from Panasonic. Sell to the more impatient at higher price, then as time passes prices will go down. Nikon Z6 III started at more than 2600 Euro, now can be purchased brand new for 2000 Euro. Lumix S1 II is a true hybrid but more on the video side.