Andrew Reid

The Canon is doing something at a low level straight from the sensor which benefits colour, right through the range to the C500 whereas the A7S and GH4 are not. You can see it in the image, it's obvious without the fiddling around. See - http://learn.usa.canon.com/app/pdfs/white_papers/White_Paper_sensitometric.pdf And - http://learn.usa.canon.com/app/pdfs/white_papers/White_Paper_35mmCMOS.pdf Now if only they'd do the same for as reasonable a price as the A7S.

​Nope. Full frame will always be more cinematic than 2.3x crop for me, let alone the fact it is smooth at ISO 3200 whereas the GH4 loses a ton of detail and colour info at that sensitivity.

That S-Gamut chart applies to the F35 and F65 top end only not the FS7 or A7S. And in Inazuma's reproduction of my screen grab he seems to think more contrast = less crushed blacks and a flatter image = more crushed blacks when it is the opposite, so make your own view of that people, that's all.

Responsive or what!? Really nice features.

​Only as good if you have a very steady hand. Olympus in body stabilisation still the leader, but it can be prone to distortion at wide angle.

​What hotshoe mount is in use there and where does the image come from? Thanks.

Nikon claimed 422. Easy to test, find footage recorded via HDMI with bright red lights in it (road traffic for example) and look at the edges of the red for pixilation. My memory is too hazy of it now to go back into the D5200.

​The light rope highlights are burnt in one and not the other. C'mon now get a grip.

Yes that sounds likely. ​Any way to show visually what you're seeing on your screen? Take a photo of your display perhaps?

It's quite light LOG and won't be pushed around compared to the other cameras in the League 1 top 10 like the Dragon's raw, or Alexa's raw. It would just fall apart. That's what the note means. It was the only camera in the top 10 shooting 8bit MJPEG. You can still grade it heavily in relation to other 8bit LOG cameras, but lightly in relation to Arri raw, etc. I can grade the 1D C as heavily as A7S ProRes with S-LOG but nothing beats raw for extreme pushes and pulls in post. It's the only 12MP full frame sensor on the market, great low light performance. There's a big difference between the A7S and NX1, GH4 in low light. You don't have to focus on minute aspects of the image to see that. There's a big difference between 4K and 1080p too. D750 is only other full frame camera on the 2014 best-of list that does such nice 1080p video but flip the 4K HDMI switch on the A7S and you won't need a magnifying glass to tell the difference. So can't agree on that, sorry! That's a bit of an oversimplification really sir. It really does depend on what you need to do with it and what lenses you have. The GH4 needs Speed Booster and fast glass to look anywhere near as nice as full frame. Then there are circumstances where the 2.3x crop recording area is actually an advantage over full frame... telephoto reach for example. Horses for courses! I have a script written with a large portion of it set around a moon lit river in woodland. So I see it as very useful actually Saves me having to get a generator, a truck and rent a very expensive set of lights - all just to mimic the look of natural light anyway. Yes you have more artistic control that way but capture the right natural light and that is even better. Agree, especially with Speed Booster and very fast glass it is underrated in low light. Lack of compression allows it to capture a lot of subtle shading in the blacks. A7S body only is not $3k more than a GH4. ​The 1D C does have a more organic look than all of them and the best colour. Finer grain as well and the blacks are intact.

​It does yes. Would still be second. It's the camera I've used the most this year, the internal 1080p really got stuff done well.

The 1080p in Super 35mm mode internally is amazing! As is the 1080p HDMI in 1.3x 4K mode. Not a hint of softness or moire, as good if not better than the C300. The full frame 1080/24p is softer - same as the 1D X but better than the 5D Mark III and more dynamic range. The 60p full frame is the softest but then so is the A7S in 60p full frame mode.

​That's interesting. How did you find this out, do you have any more info?

Nobody complains about dynamic range or image quality off a 1D X JPEG. Certainly not the professional photojournalists, action photographers at the highest level of their sports and every other 1D X user for that matter. Well Canon LOG does wonders for the highlights in comparison... same lens, same exposure (1/50, F2.8, ISO 1600) 1D C JPEG 1D C 4K video with Canon LOG

Well I don't own an ​FS7 so for me to name it the best of 2014 would be a bit of a reach. Review coming later in the month if I find time.

AccordingToMe - you're not making the forum a nicer place with your pomp and unpleasent attitude, I suggest you tone it down.

In February 2014 I said the 1D C ranked 8th in league 1 along with other cinema cameras (all in the region of $20,000+) Not sure why I put the F5 at 9, maybe I was thinking 4K with the external recorder. Anyway that's the kind of image we're dealing with here. A league 1 hollywood quality image for £5000 is my camera of the year. I don't see what's hard to tolerate or accept about that opinion. It shouldn't really be that controversial. Opinions are always based on needs, perspective and relative judgements which shift over time. Everybody's needs differ as do their opinions, again this shouldn't be the source of so much online bitching and drama. Face to face it doesn't work like this, only on the internet does it become a source of such bitter conflict. Weird! 2 years ago my friend, when the 1D C was released, Canon deserved all the criticism they got from me for pricing regular shooters out of the only major improvement Canon has made to DSLR video quality, since they started the whole democracy. It's not a democracy to them though, it's a business. A bit of a shame if you ask me. It could have been both! Canon on the one hand claim to support indie filmmakers but really they're not interested in art or niches unless they have a massive margin, aka Cinema EOS. Also for the $12,000 launch price 1D C, the lack of video features deserved to be mocked! Not even peaking for that price!? No focus magnification while rolling? Grr! They don't make our life easy considering the money we hand over. However, although these features would have been nice (cough cough) for the $12,000 / £10,000, it really doesn't bother me any more. At £5k as an owner, I am over it. I just want the image and the rock solid reliable 1D X based body, because of the way I intend to use the camera. I will be shooting through a z-finder type loupe handheld off a gorilla pod, no spidery rig or external recorder, no external battery, no shoulder mount and rails, just a small light super-8 style camera that I can go filmmaking with and get the most cinematic image available to me. If you have been an EOSHD reader for a while AccordingToMe you should be educated enough now to make your OWN choices. If the extra video features of the A7S, GH4 and other mirrorless cameras are important to you then you are not short of information are you!? I've been banging on about them all year!!

Focus is amazingly close with those diopters. Really lovely stuff. I liked the cat eyes, the bed shot with bright window in background and the bokeh / face parts best. Inspiring

I have always ranked the 1D C's image in the top 10 of all the modern cinema cameras available. This was from nearly 1 year ago - http://www.eoshd.com/2014/02/video-quality-charts-february-2014/ It is a £10,000 camera available now for £5000, in some cases £3500 (James Miller and Dan Chung sold theirs for around that amount). I don't see how this is so upsetting for those browsing for a new camera in 2015. I think it's a total bargain.

Have you tried SLOG 3 on the FS7 yet Oliver? Supposed to be a good improvement!

​That's ironic coming from Kodak

Yes the D750 is an incredibly impressive stills camera. Really enjoying it with the Sigma 50mm F1.4. Didn't expect the AF to be so good on that lens wide open. Build quality also amazing as is the 'feel' and handling. For video it is definitely 5th though.

GH4 more detailed than the 1D C? It depends where you look! Not in the blacks it isn't! In the end, 4K is 4K if 1:1 sampled. The only thing that can change your perception of sharpness is the micro contrast and digital sharpening applied in-camera. The 1D C Canon LOG has very low micro contrast and virtually no sharpening. Apply that in post and it will match the GH4 for detail. Or you can just shoot with a normal Canon profile like Portrait with sharpness not turned all the way down. Personally I prefer the softer look for 4K. It's enough res already.

*Sigh*

Yes does seem like a bug in firmware. Can anyone repeat Ivar's fix? Thanks for noting it down, might really help the others out.