Jump to content

photogrammetry vs 3d scanning


Morris Hubbert
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,


Looking for advice from people experienced in 3D scanning and photogrammetry. I'm engaged in 3D modeling of
historical miniatures and 3d printing of small figurines about a year or so. For 3d scanning I usually use
low-budget 3d sensors (tried Kinect, Intel RealSense and Asus Xtion), also used different software to
improve the quality of the obtained 3d models (Skanect, Artec Studio and Faro software). The results
are satisfying, but I want to get the best possible quality and accuracy. I've heard that by means of
photogrammetry and of a budget camera you can get better results than using cheap 3D sensors. Is that 
so? Which cameras and software are best for this?


Best regards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EOSHD Pro Color 5 for Sony cameras EOSHD Z LOG for Nikon CamerasEOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
3 hours ago, BTM_Pix said:

I'm very interested in seeing examples of the 3D models you've been able to make with this setup.

 

I ALMOST took them seriously in replying, until I saw your response. 

8 minutes ago, kye said:

How long did it take for you to find a 3d rendered picture of a can of spam??? ???


He scanned it himself! #dedication

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • EOSHD Pro Color 5 for All Sony cameras
    EOSHD C-LOG and Film Profiles for All Canon DSLRs
    EOSHD Dynamic Range Enhancer for H.264/H.265
×
×
  • Create New...