ken 109 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 This 46/2x lens is my favorite size for FF camera. Suitable to add 77mm filter thread for the biggest filters I owned. I think they are identical. But coating colors are different. Which brand was original? Zeiss Ikon? Möller? Justin Bacle 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flynn 165 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 So which one do you prefer and why? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flynn 165 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 Are these lenses really rare? I've only come across a brief clip of the Moller and nothing with the Zeiss. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ken 109 Posted September 13, 2016 Author Share Posted September 13, 2016 2 hours ago, Flynn said: So which one do you prefer and why? Zeiss's coating looks like more purple and Moller more yellow. No preference to me. They all have good flare. 2 hours ago, Flynn said: Are these lenses really rare? I've only come across a brief clip of the Moller and nothing with the Zeiss. May be not very rare. Need to use keyword "anamorphot" to find it. I just bought it. http://www.ebay.com/itm/401180992655 Flynn 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tweak 448 Posted September 13, 2016 Share Posted September 13, 2016 6 hours ago, Flynn said: Are these lenses really rare? No. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Manikk 0 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 D'you have any test shots up? Also what setup /clamps would you use on it? Thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ken 109 Posted September 15, 2016 Author Share Posted September 15, 2016 7 hours ago, Manikk said: D'you have any test shots up? Also what setup /clamps would you use on it? Thanks. Some one ask about these. So I just took some picture with 16H for comparison. Rear mount thread is the same as 16h lens----50mm. Size and weight comparison, see pictures. Roughly tested, with 85mm taking lens has obvious vignette on FF camera. I think it needs 100mm or above at least. Flynn 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ken 109 Posted September 24, 2016 Author Share Posted September 24, 2016 Tested this Zeiss lens with 100mm/f2 taking lens on FF camera. Is it OK? Justin Bacle, dahlfors and Flynn 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dahlfors 227 Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 On 9/24/2016 at 11:55 PM, ken said: Tested this Zeiss lens with 100mm/f2 taking lens on FF camera. Is it OK? Looks good. Do you have any stills or footage shot wide open at f/2? Considering the vignetting, is 100mm the widest you can go with full frame? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ken 109 Posted September 26, 2016 Author Share Posted September 26, 2016 1 hour ago, dahlfors said: Looks good. Do you have any stills or footage shot wide open at f/2? Considering the vignetting, is 100mm the widest you can go with full frame? Last two are at f/2. Maybe. But 16:9 for video should be a little bit better. Two more f/2 here, shown different focus point. dahlfors 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bold 162 Posted September 26, 2016 Share Posted September 26, 2016 Love the Zeiss IQ. That purple flare is wonderful. On 9/24/2016 at 2:55 PM, ken said: Justin Bacle 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.