92F

Thank you very much , you helped me a lot.

Thank you 

But I know this video,  it doesn't prove that with the Lut on, the log is recorded in log format.

I don't think you've tested this setting yourself, because that's what I do:
- either the Lut is applied on the monitor and it's also recorded.
- either the Lut is off, and a log is recorded, but you can't monitor your exposure in Rec 709.

Is it strange that no one noticed this ?!

I'll repeat my question; my English is poor.

With a monitoring LUT V-Log to Rec 709, it's impossible for me to film in Log without recovering the LUT when recording with the Lumix G9 MKII ?

Is it possible to record only Log without the LUT with the G9 MKII ? And how? I haven't found it.

Thank you very much.

I don't quite understand, but I have the impression that it's impossible to shoot in log without baking the display LUT? Strange, less interesting.

I don't quite understand, but I have the impression that it's impossible to shoot in log without baking the display LUT? Less interesting.

I think Sony allows it.

This is the price of a Canon EOS C7O in France( new).

19 hours ago, sanveer said:

 

Pourriez-vous également comparer le G9ii avec le GH7 ? Il semble avoir une plage dynamique légèrement meilleure et un obturateur roulant un tout petit peu meilleur également.

https://www.cined.com/camera-database/?camera=LUMIX-GH7

 

 

The CineD test simply shows the relationship between dynamics and the internal denoiser:

The GH7 tested in raw clearly shows that the significant or total absence of denoiser, reduces the dynamics because there is noise.

So if the G9Mkii, I also noticed, has a significantly better dynamics in testing, it is at the cost of smoothing.

The secret services are to protect us above all, like a doctor ... but there are some  Dr Mengele 😒

Yes, evil is everywhere, OK . But maybe it starts at home... maybe?😉

(complicated to make yourself understood, so in English it's worse, excuse me)

Have à good day 🥰

Yes and thank you for the article...👍

But between an inevitable drift of capitalism (which needs to be a little regulated, in particular against any monopoly like anti-trust law) and a stinking conspiratorial attitude affirming that it is the CIA, the aliens who would be behind all this ... "yes, yes it is well known" is a little pathetic.

There are political influences everywhere, but it must be proven 

" It is the purpose of Google / the CIA to destroy human-community " 🤪

"Vimeo was a serious-threat to power because it offered an independent, community-run information stream.

The Internet is a trash can to stir up shit ....so the less we do it on anything the more we are sure that it will go down to the bottom.

Have a good day 😉

This smells like the nauseating odor of fake news...it is unacceptable here.

Le NX800 est une bonne affaire !

The replacement for the PXW Z150 ... But still close to a PXW Z280 at more than €9,000 🙄

GH7 before ?  😊

Panasonic GH7 - Sensor image quality, rolling shutter, dynamic - V-Log or LogC?

Dynamic comparison Panasonic LUMIX GH7 vs. GH6 vs. S5 II

The GH series has become a very different niche tool from the GH5 GH4 GH3... a bit of a shame !

Not good
Instructions for use not yet accessible?
Very low autonomy and no battery grip which requires using DC Coupler (dummy battery) but bulky.
Who needs prores Raw with an M4/3...? Useless for 70% of people: a bad image will not be better in pro res raw and for what volume!?
The SSD requires a more powerful external power supply and the GH6 does not??
The ARRI C-Log is useless for 90% of buyers.

Good news :
Panasonic says that the 32-bit float is possible directly in jack 3.5 on the GH7... to check because there we remove a module which consumes battery and space, therefore perfect for run and gun.
On the contrary, on the audio module, the 32-bit float is blocked if Jack 3.5 is used.
The stability seems even better, the AF too...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRRJ-Ilo1HM

It's a joke...the topic seems a little funny to me.

" tripod improves image quality much more than 10 years development "

"Warm water is less hot than boiling water " 😄

The AF, the IBIS are remarkable advances when we do reporting... When we do cinema,  a tripod, a crane, manual focus are widely used

I have a scoop: manual focus is more effective than autofocus when I can use it.

Let's be reasonable!

4K/8K is quite far from cinema...a good FHD is softer and creamier with an FF sensor and an old lens...etc.
It's not a few extra images that change much: real cinema isn't silent cinema in black and white with a real piano in the room? Lol 

Tell me, have you tested when you lose the cinematic sensation: at 25p, 26p, 27p, 28p ...29.5p ..more?! Please, it's not a bit ridiculous...who decides, is it you?
Is slow motion filmed in 60p 120p no longer cinema? : no, stop, we have to wait for the film to return to the original 24p !? Amusing .

Cinematic rendering is a personal matter. Sometimes old high-budget films on silver film then remastered have a very clean rendering, but not sharp...very beautiful, very cinematic visual experiences

Cinema is just an illusion that arouses passions and 24p is a matter of broadcasting habits and laziness... and for TV broadcasting everything has to be readjusted,  so 24p disappears.
For video games it's only cartoons so the cinema experience here, I don't understand, it's irrational !?

Now if you are a purist, only go to cinemas and choose those where you are sure of the broadcast quality... but don't force anyone to only see 24p which jerks at the slightest important panning.

To say that 24p will disappear one day is not important, just a provocation... perhaps it will happen, I am neither for nor against it?

8 hours ago, kye said:

 

 

I always like your reasonable comments so continue to post things that I don't like..this allows dialogue. thank you

On the other hand, the title is indeed 24 p... it's so stupid to believe that this is what makes the magic of cinema that it's something to laugh about... it's so much more complicated.

There are even some who believe that in 25p it's still a camcorder and in 24p one image less and watch.... I make cinema (lived experience)...

A lot of crazy in the field of creation and audiovisual is no exception: light / lens / ... play a much more important role.

 I understood that you are following another idea from the discussion

Have a nice day and continue to share your wise thoughts 👍

On 05/12/2023 at 06:56, kye said:

Pour ceux qui pensent que ce genre de choses est uniquement destiné à Hollywood et au cinéma, c'est bien vivant dans le monde de YT. Voici une vidéo de Natalie Lynn. C'est un excellent exemple de techniques de réalisation de films appliquées à la vidéographie personnelle de voyage, et elle est très émouvante d'une manière qu'une caméra impartiale ne peut pas réaliser.

et voici une interview et un aperçu de la production sur la façon dont il a été créé :

Spoilers : il comprend un éclairage spécial, elle a acheté une machine à fumée, a passé un temps ridicule au montage, et plein d'autres choses. Il faut beaucoup de travail pour que les choses paraissent sans effort.

Personally I find it quite shitty... Wanting to make films is a bit pitiful, but is it possible to film cleanly?

Ok a lot of self-sacrifice but if it's making cinema (speech/story lousy, image deliberately degraded to make... "eh I'm making cinema well yes it's 24 p"

Not held for more than 5 minutes,  mental age 12 years max 

This doesn't make me dream at all... a lot of empty talk to say I'm doing cinematics.

Sorry ..

Yes,  probably APSC is better for you but a little less easy or friendly

Honestly, why complicate your life... for family video take a Panasonic G9 MKII or a Sony 6700 for example... the AF will be almost perfect for you... that's the target: lighter, more stable, less expensive... 

Just a thought and have a nice day

Yes  strongly that CineD publishes its report on the dynamics and its crash test...

"The GH6's special Dynamic Range Boost function is now even permanently activated and turns off automatically from 60 fps. So the G9II and GH6 should currently be able to offer the best dynamic range of any MFT camera on the market. "Slashcam

If you focus on stability and autofocus and wide angle, cheaper and lighter lenses...the G9 II surely ?

Otherwise if the sensitivity and creative capabilities of the FF interest you the S5 II , but overall it will be more expensive and bulky... 

And wait for in-depth tests on the sensitivity of the G9II ?

I don't really understand your intervention here...it should be in a topic dedicated to desires, dreams...I'm absolutely not asking all of that from a G9...you have to change the range of device.

Good day