filmmakereu

A better test of resolution would use the same lens on all three cameras, at the same aperture,
on a tripod with careful manual focusing at a high viewfinder magnification. 
Maybe a SLR prime with a fotodiox adapter for each camera mount.
He used a Fuji zoom for the X-T4, a Tamron zoom for the Sony, and a Nikkor zoom for the Z6.
Still enjoyed this comparison, better than most. There are a lot of variables to try to control.

Thanks @Dave Maze Really early 2020... ; -)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mad-mike-hughes-daredevil-and-flat-earth-theorist-killed-in-rocket-crash-2020-02-22/
How's this possible in the XXI century?
Isn't there a limit for freedom of thinking?
Flat earth theorist !?? Are they kidding me?
Aren't there mental health authorities in US? I mean US, but could be anywhere else. Seems pretty clear to me, there's a border between common sense vs (plain/full) insanity.
Why not to simply forbid this kind of acrobatics? Last time I heard there are rules for drones to fly...
IMHO society (that is, all of us) represented by the State is responsible for such loss.

No, you only need to be stupid in a factual, dictionary defined sense of the word.

Do not be misled! The Great Conspiracy of Cartographers will not prevail! Despite their efforts to sabotage the search for TRUTH with this “accident”, the TRUTH will be revealed!!! Martyr Mike’s body may now be led to rest under the flat earth, but the TRUTH will rise and take it’s ascendancy over the promulgations of the false spherical earth theorists!!!!!

Probably just ignorant or too naive as some other alternatives or excuses, isn't it? ; )
No, read again my post... "I mean US, but could be anywhere else." I think I left it clear, no? Of course, there are silly people everywhere WTH.
Evel Knievel never scheduled a stupid agenda to justify his entertainment business AFAIK. Horses for courses.
I think and do defend authorities should play a role on certain cases. Insanity can be dangerous as much as flying drones or rockets for that matter. No idea how people stare to attend such sad show. First question to come to my mind: are we talking about a licensed or allowed activity to begin with? To launch rockets to the space like we all live in somewhere more than 100 years ago? Last time I checked we are in 2020... ; -)
Shame on everyone who let this happen.

Insanity is a severe mental disorder and State should be responsible for, in order to provide efficient assistance.
Your freedom of thinking is harmless until the day it can hurt.
I don't like to use safety belt in my car, as well I find too boring any rules, those about drones included.
But, sense of community and rationality -- the reason, means to respect them. This comprehends to respect the others.
Your freedom CANNOT prevail over the freedom of other people or the rights and civilized principles such as caring of patients with mental problems, even if apparently healthy because Psychiatry is a truly complex medical specialty. Let alone the whole invisible world behind.
Respect common sense is an obligation of yours to see your right of free thinking to be respected as well.
We're not living in the Germany of 30s. This applies for both ends. Got it?
E : -)
 
PS:
Not only the State but also the sponsors are responsible for this tragedy. They created such a circus in this crazy world of profit where we all live in. A shame, a crime without punishment too. I do care about the world around me. It invariably concerns me. Or I just am an(other) accomplice.
http://balua.org/mission-take-the-rooster-of-barcelos-into-near-space-by-marco-neiva/
Disclaimer: This is a project that was financed by a friend and business partner of mine, also stereographer (has worked with Peter Greenaway BTW IMDb LINK), no one had to be killed or was harmed (rooster included) to collaterally photograph and show the spherical reality as it is...

F900, David... Yes indeed, you're right and it fairly was the case, the year is 2001 and we were just finishing the film school (in my personal story of life, the first level -- editing*, directing came two years after), thinking to split it in 52 shares as many weeks the year has. To also match different needs and pockets, obviously. When DVX100 and subsequently HVX200 later (despite that pixel shifting controversy) popped up (E : -)
 
* One of my mates was from your department (sound), he is producer and director today and I helped him to co-produce the next piece of work : ) Once I was accused : D up there to not give a damn for my content activity, even though, this forum I guess is gear oriented not for showing up our ego LOL because there's a right place out there for that, here is a re-post of the trailer for the feature we were able to shoot on a stock 5D Mark II (so, no ML hack there) half a dozen years ago, released the following year:
 

He did something really unique during the release presentation of The Baldlands, he composed the score and interpreted it in a live concert during the movie screening, go figure, as you can watch in these two clips:
 
 
No idea yet, it can happen : ) My ultimate goal is always the movies. I produced with Spike Lee as Executive Producer a short doc in Indonesia, no regrets ; ) But for now, there are only funds to be managed : -)
 

A while back I posted a tutorial on film emulation and recreating halation and grain in a realistic way. I recently came out with a new video that goes over it in a better, more concise way.
I see quite a bit of people asking how to achieve the look of film and it's characteristics so hopefully this video can help them out!
A big thanks to the Lift, Gamma, Gain forums for figuring a lot of this out also feel free to share your results and download the PowerGrades I've provided on my website!
 
 
 

To the letter.
Every inch Joker's cinematographer Lawrence Sher said from that video posted by @Emanuel a couple of posts above...

Indeed, I see some others noticed on YT comments but you didn't address the note... so nothing about the performance of the device then? Just circumstances how you operate the whole thing?

I am not sure I understand the question? Are you asking why it is shaky between 1:09 and 1:24 and not after? If so, I believe I am running between 1:09 and 1:24.

@mojo43 what happened there going along such extreme variable results comparing the footage in-between 1:09 and 1:24 with the next other to come from minute 1:44/1:45 as for instance on the following video?