BTM_Pix

If it is an RR80 then this is a compatible one with a less prominent shell (which I'm presuming are for for the resistors) and a coiled cable which you should be able to cable tie up if you want it shorter. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cable-Met-K-Compatible-with-the-Remote-Release-Fujifilm-RR-80/352279060053?hash=item520577de55:g:peIAAOSwD~FbwLjF If you want to make it permanently shorter then just cut and splice after the housing like this

Sekor C lenses were for their medium format 645 system and CS lenses were for their 35mm system.

I haven't used any of the other ones to be honest but at first glance I would say the preset memories for camera/focus settings and joystick integration would be a couple of differences. Hope that helps.

Yep, its the current winner. I do feel morally obliged as a fully paid up member of the remoaning liberal elite to take a Leica though

Yeah, my acceptance of whatever will happen has reached the point where I'm returning to go on the march on Saturday but I'm more exercised about what camera to take to document it with than fretting over whether a million people marching through the streets of London will influence the outcome whatsoever !

Well there is a connection between her and I... We're both from Liverpool, her name is Comer and thanks to Brexit I often feel like I'm in one.

Sounds uncannily familiar. Did it rain a lot there too ? I love Escape Room places. Played one in Madrid recently that was based on a Cold War scenario having to find evidence in a spy's flat (with perfect period decor) of a plot to launch a first strike that culminated in having to enter a code into a Commodore PET to send the abort codes to the missiles. I killed us all, sadly.

Ooh that was me, that was me !

Its definitely an SA mount. If it is a used one and you can't get a refund/exchange then you will be able to sell it on without too much loss as it is a very popular lens for SD Quattro owners. Sigma themselves offer a permanent mount change service but the price of this went up not so long ago and it is now more expensive than any loss you'll take selling it and re-buying another used one in EF mount.

Unusual to the very end.

Irrespective of the length of the post, it contained very worthwhile content so I certainly wouldn't be down on yourself for that let alone ask for it to be removed.

No it connects over wifi as per their web interface stuff. Its actually going to form part of a far more elaborate controller for multiple JVC units so other versions will be able to more than just turn the record on and off This was more of a solution to a personal pet peeve I have with it and as a proof of concept after, erm, figuring out how their web control worked.

They are quite cheap in the UK too https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/NEW-Olympus-M-Zuiko-Digital-15mm-1-8-0-F8-BCL-1580-Body-Cap-Lens-White/123095987776?epid=1708126927&hash=item1ca917b640:g:X9UAAOSwXrBa3ico I find that the quirkier coloured lenses like white ones (and silver for quite a few as well) tend to be sold off cheaper.

Those of you who follow me on Twitter (all one of you ) may have seen me referring to developing a controller for the LS300 and other JVC cameras. One thing that bugs me when recording externally with it it still having to use the fold out LCD display to see the current settings, which isn't ideally ergonomically but also its pretty difficult to see. So here in all its taped up glory is my first mini-product for the LS300 which is a small wireless status display which shows current settings and can be mounted on a tripod handle, a gimbal handle, a rig or on the monitor itself. And has a small switch in it tor remote start/stop recording.

The value of the £ is somewhat, erm, "fluid" depending on where we are in the shambles on any given day but even so it shouldn't have lurched that much !

That's precisely what I did. So if @Kisaha clicked where the red arrow goes he gets to the exact post, rather than clicking where the blue arrow goes which takes him to the first post. The issue was his link clicking game being weak

Make sure you click the arrow top right it will take you directly to the post. Its Page 362 mate. Although its 362 on my phone might be different on a laptop etc.

Some white wall based comparison testing with the 18-35mm on the LensRegain, the Metabones 0.71x and a dumb adapter on the Pocket4K for you. Including downloadable files to peep with

This one is a cine version that looks to be in decent condition and with some haggling I'm hoping to get it for £200ish. Which is, what, $68 at the current exchange rates?

Whereas I've been hunting for a cheap copy of their 135mm and think I might have found one. There will be a scant amount of resisting going on.

Yep, its down to what the OP wants to do with it and how often so I'm only throwing it up as the compromise as it seemed to me like the requirement was for an FS5 form factor and features with a more cinematic look (like we can ever define that on here ) and RAW hence the Odyssey. Which would be the Ursa Mini Pro but then, as you say, everything else gets bigger around it. The obvious answer is to buy both but I'm very liberal with other people's money.

Just playing devil's advocate but maybe the compromise play is to get an Ursa Mini Pro to get a bit of both worlds ?

Uncle Acker you mean? Yeah, he said its fine. As long as you get the PRS to agree as well https://www.prsformusic.com/licences/using-production-music/films-and-trailers

If you are going to be doing a lot of this and just want something you can set up and leave then I'd have a look at the Samson G-Track Pro USB condenser microphone. Nowhere near as flexible as doing it using separate components but its far easier to deploy and actually performs very well. Not only does it keep within 3 figures price wise it actually only just creeps into 3 figures !

Here's a fun fact that connects Stranger On The Shore and lens tests... Gene Cernan included the Acker Bilk version of it on a cassette tape that he took to listen to on a work trip in 1969. When he went on a similar work trip three years later he left his camera at his destination when he returned home because he wanted to see what effect solar cosmic radiation would have on the lens but he expressed regrets about it later because in the end no co-workers ever went back to pick it up for him. Its a pity really as it was quite a decent lens, although I'm sure we could find a Samyang that would match its performance quite closely even without the radiation damage.