gt3rs

There are a couple of key things that we need to see by people really using it and not all these yt useless preview of the preview preview 🙂: - 4k 120fps and 8k LOG and RAW, can you continuously do 1-5 minutes takes with a 1-5 minutes breaks in-between without overheating or not? If yes then is probably fine for a lot of people especially because this modes produce huge files so I doubt people will record 3h of 8k RAW in a day anyway, but if after 3-4 takes you need to cool down the camera for 15min then is a major usability issue. - 4k binned quality and RS up to 30fps - 4k binned can the camera shoot all day (restarting every 30 min as any canon dslr so far) If the binned quality is good and there is no overheating and in high quality modes you can take as many short takes as you want then is an ok compromise to get these "super modes". For what I saw so far 4k 120fps seems quite good, of course not like 5.5k 60 from the 1Dx III but a huge increase in quality compared to the 1080 120fps (that is barley usable) of the 1Dx III. RS seems similarly bad as the 1Dx III for the oversampled modes and 8k. RS in 60 and 120 fps is of course good or very good. Did not find yet a binned 4k 30 fps RS example.

As far as I know there is no signal from camera to the mike that recording has started or stopped. On the VP83F you need to press a button to start and stop the internal mike recording. Then synchronizing without a scratch track is more challenging....

Worst case is 16ms at 60p...... above that is physically impossible so 16ms is very good for FF... from the @padam posted video RS in 25p is quite bad similar to 1Dx III but was it oversampled or not?

This is useful information not like my post......

I did and do tons of filming with 1Dx II before and now 1Dx III so why I should move to a photo forum. If you look in the 1Dx III thread there is tons of info that I provided on the camera and Resolve. I tend to join only threads on stuff that I know and use it. As I use the 1Dx III mostly in RAW I think I can provide info here..... Everybody is talking that RAW is unusable but I find the 5.5K RAW much better and faster to edit that 4k 265 10bit 4:2:2 but only a few here have used 4k 265 10bit 4:2:2 just to give an example....

Are you serious? maybe you should stop posting in a canon r5 thread if is not for your the camera. And if you don't care about the photo part why on earth you don't buy a real cinema camera? suggesting to somebody with more posts and reputation here than you to move out is very rude.

Sorry I meant 4k FF 120fps.... not only 4k FF my bad

I'm not sure what people expected from a 4k $ camera that the main target are photographers. I bet that 90% of the sales goes to people that mostly do photo and just a bit of video. So let see how many cameras can do 4k 120 fps with AF: -C300 III (11k $) -R5 (4k $) How many cameras can do 4k FF with or without AF: - R5 How many 8k RAW: -RED - R5 8k with AF - R5 At the moment nothing else on the market at any price not even for 100k $, I see the silly comparison with phones etc... but this is the first FF 4k 120fps ever and is kind of affordable. So yes it has 15min limit at 4k 120fps but I take that instead of the alternatives that does not exist. Maybe A7S III but if it has 12mpix is a video only device imo. People should get real, of course with the limitation is not a camera for everybody and is not even a camera target only at filmmaker (Cxx are) so it does not fit you need just move on but saying that is crippled etc.... is just silly. No photographer wants a camera with fan and as the main target are photographers they did not put a fan on it as they have dedicated C line with fan for the long takes scenarios. I do mostly sport and action and have the 1Dx III, I normally need two cameras (for remote) and adding a R5 is almost a no brainer as is a great remote camera at 12 or 20fps, small and with a bonus 45mpix where I can crop a lot if needed (example ice hockey net cam) and give me more lightweight on gimbal and 4k 120fps with AF that for sport/action is really cool. If you would do long interview or very long take I would buy something else. I will wait the more real world reviews and also to be able to play with the files 8k RAW and non and 4k oversampled and binned to real see with my eyes how is the quality and then probably buy one. My biggest wish would be that they were opengate as it would be even better for pulling pictures something that I do a lot out of the 5.5k raw of the 1Dx III, 8k opengate would be really good for me.

I believe he was joking as judging dr by comparing the image on lcds from a yt video with the sh1 at -1 EV and R5 at +0.7 seems the most silly thing ever to do....

Yes, the recording menu of the 1Dx III is a real mess I need to double check every time what I'm on

I agree the no audio in 120fps that is all canon that have 120 is annoying. Audio slowed down sounds bad but maybe you want to decide on post if you want to slow down or simply playback real-time and is annoying that you don't have the audio

would be cool at least in 4k FF 60fps..... but the dream would be for 5.5k raw 60..... even with max time due to overheating like 15-20min. But I doubt.....

Not FF (2.4 aspect ratio only) and not with AF.

Sold mine for 2900 $ in march, 230’000 shutter click probably you can now find them around 2600 $

1dx iii you mean as it does not have the overheating limits.... similar tech but much bigger body.

I use the ronin s with the 1dx iii and 24-105, 50 1.2, 16-35 2.8 and 24 1.4 with no problem even from boats or even mounted on mountain bike

4k? AF?

Yep and when the cpu design is done by a 1.6 trillion $ company as their primary business on a 1000000 time large scale product....

Boy is first camera at any price that can do FF 120fps and you are crying because it does not fit your scenario of very long takes at 120fps then FF is not for you as this is the only one in town.... is like saying that a cheap dragster cannot race at daytona 24h...

It seems that there is an HQ mode and you can have it on or off and it changes from oversampling to binning. To be confirmed

On RS ,and I'm purely speculating here is that in FF 4k oversampling will be bad 30ms.... and if you turn off oversampling then it would be good or very good as it can do 60 and 120fps with AF...... let see when people test out and see what is the price in term of quality....

I agree R5 is targeted to photographer first and video for people that wants really high quality even in hfr with AF for short takes 1-10 min at a time. FF 8K RAW with AF nobody has it but even more impressive is FF 4k 120fps with AF, not other camera at any price has it so expecting that a 4k camera does all this in a fan less weather sealed tiny body are living in another planet... I really want to see some RAW and some original LOG 4k 120fps, RS and DR too but so far it seems much more than I was expecting.... especially the 4k 120 seems very good qualtiy but need to see more and the out of camera files....

No problem this is what a forum is for, looking in to details based on user experience. So nothing to apologies for....

Problem is that he is not recording so all the canon has histogram but goas away while you record a video. 1Dx III does it would be cool if it finally stays on.... at least this one has zebra

Where exactly? it has zebra but did not see any waveform or histogram while recording but I could have missed