Jump to content

gt3rs

Members
  • Posts

    1,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by gt3rs

  1. In 1-1 pixel crop (ca 1.34 crop) you get AF. You get all the 1Dx2 modes but in 10bit LOG. Also the DPAF is a big improvements over 1Dx II with all the new AF zones/sizes and eye tracking. For action video I like the wide zone a lot. As reality check here the long list😀 of FF no-crop 4k 60fps cameras with useable AF: - C500 ii - C700FF with crop or non ff: - C300 iii - C200 - FX9 (is the least cropped of all) - 1Dx II - 1Dx III
  2. They mention here that they have not test DR yet so there is hope that they will https://***URL not allowed***/canon-1d-x-mark-iii-review-and-sample-footage/
  3. What are you talking about? Every review is very positive, yes it has limitations as every camera but what are you expecting a C500 ii merged with an Alexa in a rather small weather sealed body at 1/3 or 1/5 of the price? Is a FF 5.5k RAW with a great AF alternatives? C500 II, Fx9 (no raw)
  4. I had the doubt that the 1Dx III is the first one doing 10bit h265 4:2:2 having R5 having the same hopefully both intel quick sync and NVidia will support 4:2:2 so resolve could use. Resolve did add support recently on 4:4:4
  5. 1Dx III has 3 formats: - 8bit h264 4:2:0 that in Resolve is HW decoded on NVIDIA 10xxx and newer. This a popular format so nothing strange here but you need Studio version to get HW decoding. - 10bit h265 4:2:2 that is currently not HW decoded by NVIDIA nor by Intel Quick Sync and afaik 1Dx III is the first camera to use it.... According to NVIDIA doc 20xx cards supports HW decoding 10bit h265 4:2:0 or 4:4:4 but not 4:2:2, hopefully they will implement 4:2:2 in the future. On a modern machine like i7 9900k the CPU can do the software decoding in real time but on slower machines is really a dog to edit. Strange thing is that IPB is faster than ALL-I and this seems like a bug to me. - RAW that is a small variation of the C200 RAW so is not really new. Canon RAW currently afaik is only software decoded and debayerd so you need a fast CPU, you still need a rather fast GPU as is downscaling 5.5k to 4k. Anyway Resolve for 4k editing whatever format needs at least 8 GB Vram. On my rather old gaming notebook RAW is 2x faster to edit that h265 10bit.... I did order a new gaming notebook (i9-10980HK, 2070 super), as soon as I get it I will report back. A desktop PC would be cheaper and faster but I absolutely need to edit on the road.....
  6. Is not mine at really high iso but should work for a quick test https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q7qp8dX3vFemiiw9h-S0DpWPg8KkxGKs/view I would need to shoot 10 sec and upload but the link should work
  7. RAW are 100% "decoded" and debayerd in CPU as far as I know, the grading is applied by the CUDA. h264 and h265 are decoded in the CUDA GPU but not the 10bit 4:2:2 only 10bit 4:2:0.... this is why 1Dx III LOG file are even more demanding on the CPU than RAW.... 20xx Nvidia can also HW decode h265 4:4:4 but apparently not 4:2:2
  8. You can just have Resolve generate optimize media..... you pick the in and out on a rough manner, drop it in the media bin and then right click all the clips and hit generate optimized media (the setting of the format are in the timeline setting). Then in edit and color tab you can just turn on and off optimize media.... very easy. This is the way I edit on my 3 years old notebook.
  9. fps is displayed on the top left of the viewer window see my above post near the 57% there is a red dot a 11 that is the current playback speed. normally it should be green with 24 or whatever. Here you can see the speed that a 9900K would get you with cinema light... https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/DaVinci-Resolve-Studio-CPU-Roundup-AMD-Ryzen-3rd-Gen-AMD-Threadripper-2-Intel-9th-Gen-Intel-X-series-1538/ As you can see it should do with basic grade > 45 fps. Something is wrong on your machine. Did you check the CPU load? On a dell XPS 15'' i7 9880H I can get around 17-20 fps with a crappy GTX 1050.... for Canon RAW CPU is the key factor
  10. Cannot be that slow as I get 11-14 fps on a 3 years old gaming notebook that the CPU is like 1/4 of yours (16 GB RAM, i7-7700HQ, 1070 M ). In the other 1Dx III thread people with similar spec (on windows) could do real time no problem. You can see it goes from 11-14 fps on a 4k DCI timeline on a 4k res screen. Source is 5.5 RAW 24fps.... full res, no optimize media and no 1/2 or 1/4 res directly from the CFexpress (you can try this to see if your SSD has an issue maybe.....) @Trankilstef machine I9 9900K, 32 gb RAM and RTX 2080 Ti can play back real time no problem.....
  11. If you want to keep the RAW for example of the 1Dx III at 30fps is 1 TB per 73min of video. HDD cost is around 0.02$ per GB so it would be around 16-17$ per hour of RAW.... Copying 1 TB from CFexpress to HDD will take quite a bit do > 2h....
  12. I posted on the no ND thread but on complex scenes where camera and subject moves in busy bg adding blur is post in resolve is not good. I need to test the plug in do...... In LV for photo with electronic shutter it can do 1/8000 so strange that in video mode it has this limitation... Forgot to add that if shoot in LOG base ISO 400 even at 1/8000 would be impossible to use f1.2 / 1.4 without NDs. RAW at iso 100 would work but at the limit
  13. Waveform is expensive in cpu cycles zebra is fairly easy so yes it could be added the problem is that canon rarely add features in future firmware updates although lately they are getting a bit better... see 24p even on entry level like m6 II etc..
  14. I even tried to put in MF to see if the RS improves.... that would have been possible imo........ I tend to guess that both image and dpaf pixels are read at the same time.... so if you skip the dpaf is faster.
  15. sh1 6k is around 28ms or so? Nothing too shocking for 5.5k FF..... it seems that DPAF slows down the scanning of the sensor. C500 II FF is really good at 16ms even with DPAF
  16. On crop the RS is very good <16 even at 24,25,30 and the video quality is still very good much much better than M6II (I have this one too)
  17. After almost two months with the 1Dx III these are the biggest negatives for me: - No DPAF if FF 50/60 fps - Bad rolling shutter in FF 30,25,24. Now if it would have DPAF at 50/60 you could shoot RAW 50 fps with a 360° shutter and would be the best for me as you can have slow motion and you have a <16ms rolling shutter and RAW. 1.3 Crop the rolling shutter is good <16 so you have options but no RAW. - No live histogram, waveform or zebra (this is the most puzzling one but was always like this on Canon). An external monitor fix this but I hate to have cables and one thing more to power. - terrible menu to select the framerate, resolution, format, crop.... you really need to pay attention what you select. - no flippy screen - 1080 120fps is pretty bad same as 1Dx II But the DPAF is incredible even for sport and action videos. I can have somebody running, biking, galloping at me with a 200-400 with a nucleus nano as poor man zoom rocker at have almost perfect focus. With the various AF zones is much better than the 1Dx II that I used to own. I love RAW as the workflow it resolve is native if I'm doing short takes I always do it in RAW. 5.5 you can crop reframe stabilize with no loss of quality and pull picture out (this I'm doing quite a bit). And the video quality is very good. With all the modes with crop and not and all the various encoding option you have ton of choice for every possible situation from 8bit IPB to 5.5k RAW. Also the audio amp seems much better. I don't care about IBIS as for video is either tripod or gimbal. Also the EVF is not key for me as on gimbal is useless and on tripod not that convenient. I prefer OVF for sports photography. In Resolve you need better HW for 10bit LOG than for RAW. Also strange that IPB LOG are faster than ALL-I LOG. Not sure I would recommend it to video shooter only mostly due to the price but if you need also a sport/action picture body it is really amazing camera. Curious to see the R5 4k 60 if it is no crop and super sampled so <16 rolling shutter and the 4k 120fps. My plan is to own both as I need two body.
  18. Did some better tests with horse showjumping (complex bg with foliage, fences and sharp turns of the horse) at 1/400 and adding motion blur in resolve is not that great too many artifacts I prefer the video without motion blur. I need to try the plugin to see if the result is better.
  19. Is RSMB much better that the motion blur in Resolve Studio? I may need to test it out the free trial.... price is fair if it is much better than resolve motion blur filter The biggest advantage for me is to take frame grabs as photo and with higher ss is easier to stabilize or slow down with motion estimation...
  20. This is a frame pulled from the video at 1/200 (for a photo a bit on the limit as you can see on the horse legs that are a bit too blurry), I have the video with added mention blur if I have the time I can pull the frame with the blur to compare. Forget the horrible location etc. as here most of the things are still closed. Goal is to provide picture like this but also some video snippets for social media etc.. this is a photo that I took at 1/1000.... so probably something 1/400 maybe a good compromise....
  21. Yep we posted in another thread about adding motion back using Resolve..... I did experiment more so it depends a lot on the scene and background as just a tad of blur does not add too many artifacts in case of complex bg like a metallic fence can cause bad artifacts. My test was a show jumping horse in a parkour the goal is to pull picture at 1/250 or 1/500 and have a usable video. So to an untrained eye you can fool them but for real pro work not sure I would use it. But in case where photo has priority I will definitely use it.
  22. Pure guess max 4500 at launch and 1 year down <4000.... biggest buyer group are photographers and more than this it becomes a nice product.
  23. I was not really clear. I meant that I cannot get the same result like EIS by using Davinci various stabilization tools, it is kind of expected as Davinci does not use gyro data (not even sure that canon writes the gyro metadata in the file).
  24. I'm probably bad, but I cant get the same stabilization that EIS is giving me in post with Davinci stabilaizer
  25. gt3rs

    Canon EOS R6

    It will be the same as 1Dx II so ca 1.34
×
×
  • Create New...