gt3rs

Wild guess here.... if the R5 use similar sensor design just more res... 8k 30 is full readout like 5.5k 1Dx so 32ms, 4k 60 is binned like 1080 60 on 1Dx, 4k 120 is like 1080 120 on 1Dx..... if it will also offer a crop mode it will probably be 1-1 pixel read out then it would be a 2x crop. Or it has a better cpu and sensor and it does all in 16ms or even 7ms and will have an amazing FF supersampled 4k 120fps that no other camera in the world has.... and then not sure it will offer a crop. I tend to bet on the first but who knows

1080p at 120 is quite soft as in 1Dx II some people say that for 120fps is good and I have nothing to compare but to me is quite bad. I did not really try 1080p 60 as I don't see the use case for me but I would tend to think that is better than 120..... did you had a chance to compare 1080 modes? My pure guess is processing time (power)..... 5.5k pixels + dual pixels and scale down is much more data to process than reading a 1-1 4k pixels + dual pixels..... could they implement center only AF as option or at least when you put the camera in MF switch to fast readout? Only canon engineers could answer this... I tend to guess again that the sensor is somewhat similar to the 500 II (FF 6k is ca16 ms) but due to cooling and processing power they cannot do both 5.5K pixel processing and DPAF pixel processing in 16ms.... I take 5.5k bad RS vs 5.5k good RS but no AF any day but I really depend on AF for others the priority it is probably the inverse. I'm quite sure that they could have implemented a MF mode that is 16ms.....

No in crop mode is quite good at whatever framerate... in FF is bad up to 30fps. FF 50, 60 is 16ms... but you lose dpaf. FF 5.5K or 4k 50,60 good rs no AF FF 5.5K or 4k 24-30 bad rs, AF Crop 4k 24-60 good rs, AF If I don’t need slow motion I mostly shoot 5.5k 24 or 25. If I need slow motion depends if I need AF or not is either 5.5k 60 or 4k crop 60 10bit I’m mostly tripod or ronin S so the main issue for me is fast pan on tripod but I rarely do. Normal panning following an athlete is not a big issue. Btw panny at 6k is 28ms so the 4ms is not a huge difference... but here seems the world is coming to an end. You don’t need af or a sport camera just don’t buy it.... you need AF there is not much alternative if any as hybrid at the moment. Curious to see if the R5 is better or not...

I took the wrong table 😒 Rolling shutter in crop mode is the same or very similar if not 100% identical between 24fps and 60fps try yourself and you will see So with the right table 4k DCI 1.33 crop 24 fps w2ill be 170 Mbits and 340 Mbits at 60 fps .

Please don't as I think I'm more than fair in my assessment see my list of negatives and I think I did contribute with mostly facts based on owning the camera: If my contribution is not welcome here just ban me but don't call me canon apologist, I learn a lot in this community and I hope I did contribute a bit.... 230 Mbits for 10 Bit Long GOP imo in 2020 is quite ok

I posted already this is not a scientific test so hard to make conclusion. How can we be sure that the exposures are the same and in what mode the 1Dx III was (D+?, LOG?) . I'm not sure where you get most DR on RAW... iso 100, iso 200 with D+ or iso 400 with LOG.... highlight recovery in RAW ISO 400 LOG ON in theory should be better but overall DR from usable shadow to highlight not sure... hope somebody does a scientific test in various modes. Also normally on Canon it seems that 10bit LOG has some NR applied so you tend to get a bit more usable DR..... this seems to be true for C500 II and C300 III not sure about 1Dx III. I don't expect to be better than the S1h but to be fairly close.

Wasn't your complain on the M6II that is upscaling and now you want that.... you can do in post if you want but you cannot do the inverse go get DCI 1-1 Comparing to 1D C datarate .... 5.5k RAW vs 4k 8bit 1800 Mbits vs 500 Mbits. But ALL-I 4k is 470 Mbits vs 500 Mbits and the MJpeg are much faster to edit than h265 ...

How could they get 1.5 crop with a 1-1 pixel read out with a 20mpix sensosr....

@Andrew Reid in your article you mention 1.5 crop not sure how you get to that as 5472 / 4096 = 2886 / 2160 = 1.336 Also I think you should mention that is your machine (hackintosh) that seems to have problem with Resolve as others with even below specs than yours can playback realtime.

In 1-1 pixel crop (ca 1.34 crop) you get AF. You get all the 1Dx2 modes but in 10bit LOG. Also the DPAF is a big improvements over 1Dx II with all the new AF zones/sizes and eye tracking. For action video I like the wide zone a lot. As reality check here the long list😀 of FF no-crop 4k 60fps cameras with useable AF: - C500 ii - C700FF with crop or non ff: - C300 iii - C200 - FX9 (is the least cropped of all) - 1Dx II - 1Dx III

They mention here that they have not test DR yet so there is hope that they will https://***URL not allowed***/canon-1d-x-mark-iii-review-and-sample-footage/

What are you talking about? Every review is very positive, yes it has limitations as every camera but what are you expecting a C500 ii merged with an Alexa in a rather small weather sealed body at 1/3 or 1/5 of the price? Is a FF 5.5k RAW with a great AF alternatives? C500 II, Fx9 (no raw)

I had the doubt that the 1Dx III is the first one doing 10bit h265 4:2:2 having R5 having the same hopefully both intel quick sync and NVidia will support 4:2:2 so resolve could use. Resolve did add support recently on 4:4:4

1Dx III has 3 formats: - 8bit h264 4:2:0 that in Resolve is HW decoded on NVIDIA 10xxx and newer. This a popular format so nothing strange here but you need Studio version to get HW decoding. - 10bit h265 4:2:2 that is currently not HW decoded by NVIDIA nor by Intel Quick Sync and afaik 1Dx III is the first camera to use it.... According to NVIDIA doc 20xx cards supports HW decoding 10bit h265 4:2:0 or 4:4:4 but not 4:2:2, hopefully they will implement 4:2:2 in the future. On a modern machine like i7 9900k the CPU can do the software decoding in real time but on slower machines is really a dog to edit. Strange thing is that IPB is faster than ALL-I and this seems like a bug to me. - RAW that is a small variation of the C200 RAW so is not really new. Canon RAW currently afaik is only software decoded and debayerd so you need a fast CPU, you still need a rather fast GPU as is downscaling 5.5k to 4k. Anyway Resolve for 4k editing whatever format needs at least 8 GB Vram. On my rather old gaming notebook RAW is 2x faster to edit that h265 10bit.... I did order a new gaming notebook (i9-10980HK, 2070 super), as soon as I get it I will report back. A desktop PC would be cheaper and faster but I absolutely need to edit on the road.....

Is not mine at really high iso but should work for a quick test https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q7qp8dX3vFemiiw9h-S0DpWPg8KkxGKs/view I would need to shoot 10 sec and upload but the link should work

RAW are 100% "decoded" and debayerd in CPU as far as I know, the grading is applied by the CUDA. h264 and h265 are decoded in the CUDA GPU but not the 10bit 4:2:2 only 10bit 4:2:0.... this is why 1Dx III LOG file are even more demanding on the CPU than RAW.... 20xx Nvidia can also HW decode h265 4:4:4 but apparently not 4:2:2

You can just have Resolve generate optimize media..... you pick the in and out on a rough manner, drop it in the media bin and then right click all the clips and hit generate optimized media (the setting of the format are in the timeline setting). Then in edit and color tab you can just turn on and off optimize media.... very easy. This is the way I edit on my 3 years old notebook.

fps is displayed on the top left of the viewer window see my above post near the 57% there is a red dot a 11 that is the current playback speed. normally it should be green with 24 or whatever. Here you can see the speed that a 9900K would get you with cinema light... https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/DaVinci-Resolve-Studio-CPU-Roundup-AMD-Ryzen-3rd-Gen-AMD-Threadripper-2-Intel-9th-Gen-Intel-X-series-1538/ As you can see it should do with basic grade > 45 fps. Something is wrong on your machine. Did you check the CPU load? On a dell XPS 15'' i7 9880H I can get around 17-20 fps with a crappy GTX 1050.... for Canon RAW CPU is the key factor

Cannot be that slow as I get 11-14 fps on a 3 years old gaming notebook that the CPU is like 1/4 of yours (16 GB RAM, i7-7700HQ, 1070 M ). In the other 1Dx III thread people with similar spec (on windows) could do real time no problem. You can see it goes from 11-14 fps on a 4k DCI timeline on a 4k res screen. Source is 5.5 RAW 24fps.... full res, no optimize media and no 1/2 or 1/4 res directly from the CFexpress (you can try this to see if your SSD has an issue maybe.....) @Trankilstef machine I9 9900K, 32 gb RAM and RTX 2080 Ti can play back real time no problem.....

If you want to keep the RAW for example of the 1Dx III at 30fps is 1 TB per 73min of video. HDD cost is around 0.02$ per GB so it would be around 16-17$ per hour of RAW.... Copying 1 TB from CFexpress to HDD will take quite a bit do > 2h....

I posted on the no ND thread but on complex scenes where camera and subject moves in busy bg adding blur is post in resolve is not good. I need to test the plug in do...... In LV for photo with electronic shutter it can do 1/8000 so strange that in video mode it has this limitation... Forgot to add that if shoot in LOG base ISO 400 even at 1/8000 would be impossible to use f1.2 / 1.4 without NDs. RAW at iso 100 would work but at the limit

Waveform is expensive in cpu cycles zebra is fairly easy so yes it could be added the problem is that canon rarely add features in future firmware updates although lately they are getting a bit better... see 24p even on entry level like m6 II etc..

I even tried to put in MF to see if the RS improves.... that would have been possible imo........ I tend to guess that both image and dpaf pixels are read at the same time.... so if you skip the dpaf is faster.

sh1 6k is around 28ms or so? Nothing too shocking for 5.5k FF..... it seems that DPAF slows down the scanning of the sensor. C500 II FF is really good at 16ms even with DPAF

On crop the RS is very good <16 even at 24,25,30 and the video quality is still very good much much better than M6II (I have this one too)