kaylee

whatever your hurdles are to overcome, it might be bad, heck it might be AWFUL (i kno), but it could still probably be worse why dont you be inspired by chuck close? chuck close is an american painter in his early career, he painted hyperrealistic portraits that looked like photos unfortunately, Although the paralysis restricted his ability to paint as meticulously as before, Close had discovered a new, and i think, better way to paint than before. his newer pieces are more interesting, and serve to cement his importance in art history so, the moral of this story is be glad you're not in a wheelchair

if youre trying to do a comparison thats even in the realm of objectivity, take what you think is a high quality 4k clip, render it out at 1080p, and watch both. compare. easy this video is wildly subjective, it makes its point, but... cmon

im aware of that, it was a gross generalization about "seeing a difference'

edit: the difference between 4k and 1080p on youtube on my 1080p TV is huge. of course i notice it! that being said, you need to have an objective idea of the resolving power of a grid of pixels... whether its 2k, 4k, whatever, theres a high end limit to the detail in an image at a given resolution, and MOST cameras dont approach that in any mode whatsoever, so its kind of an abstract comparison ? an analogy: my 5d3 shoots ~soft~ stills, to me. pleasantly soft, dreamy stills at 22 megapixels, compared to the *actual resolving power* of that 5760x3840 grid, right? other manufacturers have razor sharp images at 100%, in comparison, at the same spatial resolution. thats a matter of taste, but to think that 22 megapixels = my camera is of course retarded

that was a huge revelation after making my short in 1080p: i wish id shot a bunch of it just a little wider, and then cropped in during post. even if the extra pixels just go to straightening out a horizon line, it wouldve been super useful to have that which is huge, bc several shots that i stabilized in post were ones that i didnt plan on stabilizing at all. 4ks great for adding camera movement, as well. lots of post stuff but this is my take for something thats grading/vfx heavy, so if you have a fast turnaround its a whole different story

yeah, web, i think thats just a gimmick... does anyone remember any of the first "SHOT ON iPHONE!!!" content...? its like street art, theres a 3 second attention span for that stuff lol Steven Soderberghs the kinda guy who shoots a sasha grey film with an iphone and goes "OOo Im so edgy and keeewl yeah yeeeahhh" lmaoo

lol yup, and this

dare i ask how lol

i have an upcoming vfx rich scene im figuring out, like just ~how~ to shoot it in the first place, and im watching some tutorials......

well, objectively, i looked at the shots and i never would have released it for broadcast like that, regardless of my personal taste, or what you might see in perfectly controlled conditions – its just too flat additionally, regardless of my personal opinion, the DP's, director's or anyone else's, PEOPLE CLEARLY HATED IT. THATS NOT DEBATABLE so thats a problem lol

all the good ones~!

well that sounds awful lol its also funny that the DP blamed it on ppl who cant "tune their tvs" among other things, yet here you guys are complaining about it, and youre tv tuning experts ?

Zach, for the record, regarding college, ill give you the advice that i would give any young filmmaker: 1) you dont need to do it – online resources are incomprehensibly vast today 2) if you DO go to college for film, STUDY ART AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. ideally, you should go to an ~art~ school, major in film, but take as many classes out of your major as you can. classes for artists – 2D design, color theory, art history, etc. etc.

"If it doesn't look good on an iPad, you screwed up" – Orson Welles

yes, exactly ? !!!!! do you even KNOW that i was thinking exactly that while looking at new photoshop apps, how i like grading in resolve so much, i wish there was one with a color interface like that...??? ??? accoding to google, adobe has something like 12 million subscribers, so raising their price $3 makes $36 mil...... that was easy!!! ?

its just the doubling of the price and all ?

look, its over already~! Affinity Photo for ipad looks AMAZING, and it works with apple pencil~! and its a ONE TIME PURCHASE OF $20 SO LONG ADOBE! best of luck in your future endeavors

well wel wellllllll im NOT surprised, but this sucks~! im currently on the $9.99/mo adobe "photoshop" plan which includes lightroom (which i dont use) and 20GB of storage, which makes me feel like im beating the system but its gone! is it FINALLY time for me to look into photoshop alternatives????? ? ? ? ? ? im all in with resolve, i just have to learn fusion ? the "normal" full CC pricing went up from $49.99 to ~$52.99~ recently poor adobe, they must be going broke~! ???

ooo id love to see a clip of video to see what u guys r talking abt is this screenshot about right? if so, its great to discuss ? what im looking at is really low contrast, but assuming this is supposed to be moonlight, i like that if yall think it was too dark tho, then im sure it was lol

yeah good question @kye, id like to know that as well

can we?

addendum 2: i havent looked at projectors forever because im poor, and now im checking things out... HOW are there $600 *720p* projectors out right now?!??? HUH??? ?

update: u kno what @Emanuel, im totally buying a cheap projector like this to play with~! i already have a couple ideas, thanks for the inspiration~! ☺️ the one in the video above is $60 on amazon! ?

live projection is so smart, i feel like i should be using it for something...! hmmm ? funny, i came across this again recently, and its a few years old but i still think its mindblowing. some genius is going to combine all these things in an amazing way one day if you havent seen this, its all in camera edit: bts (*cue t2 theme*)