amanieux

you don't have the option to record video in 8000x6000 on your oneplus 8 pro ? (there is a video on yt showing that it could be done )

when you say oneplus 9 pro and zenfone 7 pro can both do 8k 30p, do you mean with stock camera app or with motioncam ? i saw on yt a 8000x6000 motioncam video recording on oneplus 8 pro example, has someone succesfully tried other smartphones that can do higher resolution than 4000x3000 on motioncam without dropping frames and overheating ? thanks

pixel 4xl is not dropping frames and looks much better than stock h265 as expected (look at color differences on the objects on the center right)

in the r5 watercooling video from diyperk, his internal temperature measurement showed a 83 degree temperature on the cpu board, if you keep on recording without cooling, won't the image sensor get warmer and start to show up more image noise as heat goes up ?

good AF is a major selling point, most of the time we are fimling humans and humans move so with manual focus you never get the advantage of high resolution/sharp lenses with FF shallow depth of field as you are slightly out of focus 90% of the time

the algorithm to convert raw data to uncompressed 8 bit is much less computational intensive than compressed 10 bit, not sure if this camera have enough computational power or good enough heat diffusion to handle that internally

looks like a fresh new camera built from the ground up without the weight from the past so why did they kept the old outdated sd card media ? m.2 ssd are cheaper, faster and have a bigger capacity we are dealing with huge raw files after all so so why did they not put a m.2 internal ssd slot instead of a sd card slot ?

when comparing a6600 to xt30 of course xt30 is cheaper and better in some aspects but what about the 10 min max recoding time in 4k vs unlimited recording ? you should not nitpick your arguments but rather give an honest pros and cons list and let us decide what compromise we want to make for our specific needs as unfortunately no camera has it all (though a73 is the closest to a good hybrid camera all rounder)

just saying you could do it with a $1700 combo (CeyeAF with sigma 30mm f1.4) but you cannot do it with any other camera and wether you like it or not it gives intensity :

the only great thing about a6600 you don't even mention is continuous eye AF in video, do you know another camera that can do that ? a f1. 4 closeup with the $289 sigma 30mm will open up the possibility of interview with nearest eye in focus and the rest of the face blurred - a very intimate image with cinematic intensity https://images.app.goo.gl/3A5aCA1CFmzxRsyXA

true nikon and fuji were the only 2 makers not having a pro video line to protect but the survival window is getting smaller and smaller, i believe it is too late for nikon, time will tell.

nikon wont have time to get it right, after being dormant for decades , camera market is moving fast, today's tiny market is too small now to have so many different camera makers

z6 was a nice camera, too bad nikon did not grab the opportunity to be the first hybrid FF camera with raw video, they now tiptoe with a paid raw upgrade with return to service center instead of going full speed ahead, window of opportunity is closing, they wont have a second chance now that the camera market is quickly shrinking. this is the nail in the coffin, nikon is so dead. i believe sony and canon will be the only 2 survivors in the hybrid camera market (unfortunately for us consumers, as less competition means slower innovation and higher prices)

s35 and 6k are nice to have but what we wanted was bigger internal battery and internal ssd slot (m. 2 or sata) ! both would have cost nothing extra but made it a one piece camera instead of a rigged hell

they hit no wall, they are just without competition in the sensor business so they have no incentive to innovate, things will come from newcomers, samsung was a good contender but they drop the ball