Emanuel

The new firmware (2.5) is out, and this is the firmware specifically crafted for GX80/85. Hopefully this addresses all the image-stabilization-related problems you might have. I would like to point you to the image stabilization documentation page. You may download it by clicking on 'SUPPORT/DOWNLOAD" near the top.
http://metabones.com/article/of/mft-manual-image-stabilization 

Everyday more clips pop up everywhere. I guess this will be one of the hits in the history of the camera. Take those "unbelievable" remarks with the necessary pint of salt, obviously... : )
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Another low light test:
 
To those who still praise action cameras look ; ) beyond the obvious limitations also shown by Mavic, here's some chance to compare both:
:P
From an Indie perspective:
 
Interesting stability test:
 
Here's a comparative review with Karma:
 
:-)

A few ones more:
 
 
Interesting color case study:
 
The last two -- the embedded option is not available, Fall 'according to Mavic':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBq_LWDswko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKsYoUcwDfQ
 

Sad to come and pee on the parade... the introduction is pretty straight, though:
 

Indeed, curious the fact in the last couple of months, there are more reviews involving GoPro cameras but, I see no review on Mavic Pro:
https://www.youtube.com/user/wired/videos
In any case, there was one Mavic unit for this Karma review. He seems to have forgotten to review the new DJI bird :-) 

There are millions behind the sales air race, that's the reason why. Pity that both sides don't choose to release a better and higher bitrate codec...

Pleaded:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK5DigCpzeI&lc=z13qxtqyrvuus1g5a04cjnlrysrgvz4gvlc0k.1478039068043991
 

There are millions behind the sales air race, that's the reason why. Pity that both sides don't choose to release a better and higher bitrate codec...

Pleaded:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK5DigCpzeI&lc=z13qxtqyrvuus1g5a04cjnlrysrgvz4gvlc0k.1478039068043991
 

Pleaded:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK5DigCpzeI&lc=z13qxtqyrvuus1g5a04cjnlrysrgvz4gvlc0k.1478039068043991
 

hahaha I agree! Good catch!
Really sucks! He says. So gopro does not?? He says he speaks as filmmaker.... Really? As filmmaker or news shooter??
Funny, people have no idea what it means to be filmmaker. Not even what filmic means. Strange days.

"As a filmmaker", the reviewer says. haha
No worries, gopro has another biased review to praise their product now.... ^  They had some other to compare with at least.

Thanks for sharing.
It's incredible strong footage, you just have to look at the histogram. Even after torturing it doesn't fall apart.

It's almost a punishment to get back to GH4 footage after playing what comes from the terra. Luckilly the BMPCC gives a bit of the terra feel

Razor sharp 2.5K > Bad compressed 4K

I looked at the video's thumbnail and saw the Karma fully extended sitting next to the Mavic completely folded so I can already guess which one the author is biased towards.

Well...it kind of was to be expected that the Karma wouldn't be as stable in the air or have all the flying features DJI has developed over the years.
But the point where GoPro totally dropped the ball imo is by not having improved the codec and overall IQ over the 2 year old GoPro 4...

That was the one thing they had going for themselves and they chose to leave it completely untouched..shame.
 

I just hope that DJI will upgrade their cameras/sensor in Mavic/Phantom. 
There is no way to upgrade camera on Mavic so (according my opinion) its camera should be better than 2 years old GoPro 4 sensor with just 60Mbps.
I do not understand why DJI can still use quite old technology if sensors in smartphones are still better and better every year (and they can handle higher bitrate than 60Mbps). I just wish that there will be Phantom or bigger Mavic one day with similar technology which can be seen in Sony FDR X3000: 4K with 100Mbps + just 8Mpx sensor with "big" pixels + OIS (we can see little shakiness sometimes on Mavic's footage, so why there cannot be OIS if it is in smartphones (?)).
These specs together with 1,5x or 2x zoom lens.... that would be my dream drone. Mavic is really great but I will rather wait ;-)

I don't find Phantom 4 any better than Mavic. I find Mavic better than the phantom 4, gopro, etc with their oversharpened settings.
I agree with Pavel.

Here's a curious Mavic Pro / GoPro Hero 5 / Phantom 4 / Phantom 3 camera comparative:
 




 

 


 

 

Indeed. It is not the first time this has been noticed.
Because of manual focus? Lens design flaw/issue (remember that's not rare or it is even common to occur with anamorphic lenses, mostly affordable ones) or QC case to comprehend only a part of the production as same as seems to have occurred with Nokia Lumix 1020?

In certain cases, yes, as it seems to clearly be the case here: