Emanuel
-
Posts
6,853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by Emanuel
-
-
8 hours ago, Geoff CB said:
RS is on of the most defining differences between high end cameras and consumer ones. If I cannot use pans in a shot that takes away a storytelling tool. And the A6300 isn't simply bad, it's horrendous, it's easily the worst performing RS of any consumer camera. It makes it unusable in any professional filmmaking setting, relocating it to use in interviews and event work.
Simply because a6300 is not a professional video camera, neither for stills. It is a camera for amateurs, low budget indies who can use it carefully as B camera. In a tripod as most part of shots in any serious narrative piece, it can actually shine if the shooter knows the limitations of the device. If so, it can be a very interesting tool, really not expensive.
-
54 minutes ago, Nikkor said:
Oh comon emanuel, thats slomo footage. The 6300 does have the worst RS around, and RS is a problem.
Horses for courses. No one can say RS is not there. Awful? For testing? Yes, it is. But, a good shooter should know how to use the tools, as we all know but tend to forget in the most geeky way of pages populated of geeks we all are too : ) a shooter is beyond that! :-)
In the last part, there's 4K footage.
-
Current choice, current panorama...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/panoramic
That ad is only a joke because Mavic wins the race hands down... ;-) It is a game changer, fellows!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKInNs0z-20
-
13 minutes ago, Marco Tecno said:
What about 4k?
Last part. Listen: people are hysterical about RS, high ISOs and so on. There, you/we/you all have access to a good lesson how to properly use that capture device, even handheld... shooter oblige ;-)
-
On 06/10/2016 at 5:08 PM, Nodnarb said:
The rolling shutter on the a6300 is just awful. (...)
Awful RS, you said?
-
Nothing compares to Mavic Pro in the current panorama, nothing.
-
-
7 hours ago, tugela said:
The NX1 is markedly superior to the RX100M3, both with stills and video. But it does not fit in a pocket however.
I didn't ask it. I only mentioned the NX1's low light performance versus Sonysssss... ;-)
-
I never disliked Samsung products, even though, those blues (hue) are a particular signature of this camera, not exactly from multiple choice straight out the box. You shoot with one, blues and magentas will invariably look the same each time you use it. But, it is up to you, if it is you're liking... I much appreciate à la Fuji: you have accurate skin tones and that's it. You can color it in wherever route you want with no much time around it.
-
PS: That is, in the case you'd be using 1000ft rolls (+/- 11 minutes), because 400' cans (35mm) take less than 5 minutes @24fps...
1 hour ago, Emanuel said:Does your NX1 match this low light performance à la Sony's MILCs?
Comes to my mind the first Cinealta F900 (BTW, 2/3" sensor format) imagerie seen circa 2001; a couple of kilos/pounds more *cough cough* 100x more expensive; without lens, player recorder setup neither...
Let's not forget as far as the limit of 5 minutes concerns because of overheating, a few here were used to shoot film within the 10-minutes limit, so... ;-) Some complaints on these boards remind me those kids used to modern life with no clue about hard life in some other latitudes...
:X
-
5 hours ago, tugela said:
(...) The RX100 was no where near as good as my NX1 (or even my old Canon) in terms of picture quality (...)
Does your NX1 match this low light performance à la Sony's MILCs?
Comes to my mind the first Cinealta F900 (BTW, 2/3" sensor format) imagerie seen circa 2001; a couple of kilos/pounds more *cough cough* 100x more expensive; without lens, player recorder setup neither...
Let's not forget as far as the limit of 5 minutes concerns because of overheating, a few here were used to shoot film within the 10-minutes limit, so... ;-) Some complaints on these boards remind me those kids used to modern life with no clue about hard life in some other latitudes...
-
X5/X5R are another league... Let's not mix up apples to oranges ;-) Phantom 4 or Karma have nothing to do with. The reception theory ; ) can fit but people are still stuck on the wrong variables, obsessed with definition when this doesn't necessarily mean better IQ, on the contrary, more often than we could aspire to.
- nffclml2ppl and shooter
-
2
-
On 07/10/2016 at 4:05 AM, thefactory said:
I use my a6300 mostly for photos these days or b-cam. Main camera is a7sii which i love shooting on. More dials, less fiddling around. I wont be rushing out to buy the 6500 but i'm very much looking forward to these features in a A7riii a7siii or maybe even the rumoured a9 emount.
A peculiar pair...
-
3 hours ago, JazzBox said:
To me it is pretty good! The shot on the roof shows that moire is not too severe... so it is already a good point in my opinion.
Two days ago I shot a music video and there was also an operator with his Phantom 3 Pro, it seems more "digital" to me from the shots I have from it.Mio caro, exactly my POV! We both share the same cinematic perspective on motion pictures, let it alone the aerial footage. Unfortunately, people are too uneducated with their small displays. We live in a sad age where artifacts are the king. Sawtooth borders (when not aliasing) are taken for sharp content... What else can we say? *Phew*
To me, this is the first small drone to focus my attention on it. For the same reasons you mention.
Still from the European press presentation in Lisbon (I know very well those locations and how curious is to me to see them to be shot like that with so tiny capture device -- DJI should/could/can slash the GoPro business with that toy/cam beyond the drone industry) take a look from 3:48 minute on:
- shooter, nffclml2ppl and JazzBox
-
3
-
AF won't do any good if you'll end shaky neither.
Other than that, only the small sensor size could hurt. Seen it as a competent B camera, of course :-)
-
Well, it is faster than the previous model, you can have access to better AF, they say low light performance is increased from improved high ISOs and cherish in the top of the cake, you reach 6.25 seconds of 5.5K RAW... Not bad.
http://petapixel.com/2016/10/06/sony-rx100-v-worlds-quickest-focus-fastest-shooting-af-points/
-
-
So, you rant over it and you're getting a third unit when the new comer is out there now? I am lost on your plan...
-
1 hour ago, Mattias Burling said:
(...) And its not only that you risk missing the action. For every second you are closing in on the overheat.
BTW: I must be mad but Im actually thinking about getting my third rx100iv today. (...)
??
-
Fake.
-
Sigh. It is a pity that Samsung is out of the game. Almost as much as this usual thread highjacking, whenever a new toy is out there. Let's accept the fact the summer is over in the northern hemisphere. Southern hemisphere follows.
-
I don't think they fail with such marketing approach and production/sales strategy.
In any case, your point, Andrew, is pretty accurate on the way they see you and me.
-
G7 / G70 (Germany) and the GX85 / GX80 (outside US) / GX7 Mark II (Japan) are the best bang for the buck out there, nowadays and ever, so far...
Albert, BTW, left his NX1 for a G7 ;-)
- John Matthews and Mat Mayer
-
2
-
Drone - the current choice...
In: Cameras
Posted
I don't see any better IQ on the Phantom 4 side versus the Mavic Pro, actually, on the contrary... IQ is beyond artificial edges to my eyes or sharpness as you wish.