Emanuel

37 minutes ago, liork said:

Who said the GH5 will be?

 

16 hours ago, Neumann Films said:

(...)

Many words in grey, I wish they were not,

At the top of the list, the word with six thousand dots.

 

Great and promising info, thanks Luke! (E :-)

 

a6500 is a must have. Well, Fuji's color science too ;-)

To me, Sony's low light response and S35 format coupled to reasonable AF and IBIS at the minimum LCD (stands for least common denominator) is a no-brainer.

Only price target is overrated IMO, perhaps. But aside lowest Panasonic range, isn't the remainder offer the same panorama after all?

8 minutes ago, Andrew Reid said:

Shall I review it?

Yes, indeed.

Saramonic CaMixer Adds a Headphone Jack to Your Sony a6300 / a6500

 

On 30/11/2016 at 11:18 PM, Andrew Reid said:

I am impressed with how little rolling shutter it seems to have in 4K.

A much better option than a Sony A6500 for handheld shooting, I think.

 

I much prefer the most cinematic a6500 outcome. Either colors or low light response. Even though, not comparable as far as rolling shutter and IBIS concern for sure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 02/12/2016 at 3:39 PM, bigfoot said:

I like the short film on cinema5d.com for the review of the a6500

 

Great production quality overall 

+1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

here's another one not able to embedded though:

https://vimeo.com/193513057

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer... ;-)

8 hours ago, Damphousse said:

Nice of you to give that click bait even more attention.

Apples to oranges... ;-)

http://www.phonearena.com/news/The-iPhone-6s-vs-Nikon-D750-4K-video-beating-the-pants-off-a-DSLR_id74514

In any case, apples to oranges... ;-)

 

 

another interesting review:

 

 

So, color science à la Fuji, you say? ;-)

Indeed. Even though, Panasonic has managed all this in a different way.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Philip Bloom:

 

7 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

As soon as the first 4K camera came on the market that interested me, the GH4, I stopped caring about sharpness any more.

We have more detail than anybody can possibly notice when watching the film.

Sharpness has become a pixel peeping tech spec curiosity rather than a really noticeable differentiator as it was with the 1080p cams.

In fact too much sharpness is bad... high detail should be softer like on the 1D C in Canon LOG, with the option to dial it up with a sharpness filter in post.

Yes there are still minor differences - some like the Samsung NX1 and A6500 over-sample from 6K sensors to 4K. Some from 5K-ish to 4K like the A7R II Super 35mm mode and X-T2.

But seriously nobody notices when they see your footage.

True. 4K is a golden standard for motion picture BTW. Big screen for theatrical release included. IMAX aside, perhaps.

Actually, there is more beyond sharpness. Mavic outcome is a fine example of that.

On 13/11/2016 at 10:23 AM, Emanuel said:

Well, unless we can call accidental to the tap to focus feature...

This feature is unique, not present in any one of the Mavic competitors. Without mention a lens aperture almost one stop faster comparing with the previous offer : )

As written earlier, so far, the jury is still out if it is a QC issue, a design flaw or a feature from its tap to focus design.

I'd even dare to bet beyond (and a way more) than faulty units...

The tap to focus design + a shitty codec for half-focused areas when the settings on sharpness are dialed down.

:-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofey0eqC74g&lc=z12ew11pnvnvdjdfh232g1si1rb3ulh1m

 

 

Even though, I may follow Andrew on his X-T2 bet, well, some perspective(s) also will ;-)

https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&normalization=full&widget=105&x=-0.07116278920634347&y=0.7982730037049333

https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&normalization=full&widget=105&x=-0.07116278920634347&y=0.7982730037049333

On the other hand...

On 19/11/2016 at 8:00 PM, scotchtape said:

From all of the sample footage I've seen, the A6300/A6500 is the sharpest 4K of them all.  

https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr72_0=4k&attr72_1=4k&normalization=full&widget=426&x=0.4260463692707934&y=-0.13237727523441808

https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&attr72_0=4k&attr72_1=4k&normalization=full&widget=426&x=0.4260463692707934&y=-0.13237727523441808