Emanuel

Indeed. The business to back this nonsense to begin with. This seems too stupid to be true...

Probably just ignorant or too naive as some other alternatives or excuses, isn't it? ; ) No, read again my post... "I mean US, but could be anywhere else." I think I left it clear, no? Of course, there are silly people everywhere WTH. Evel Knievel never scheduled a stupid agenda to justify his entertainment business AFAIK. Horses for courses. I think and do defend authorities should play a role on certain cases. Insanity can be dangerous as much as flying drones or rockets for that matter. No idea how people stare to attend such sad show. First question to come to my mind: are we talking about a licensed or allowed activity to begin with? To launch rockets to the space like we all live in somewhere more than 100 years ago? Last time I checked we are in 2020... ; -) Shame on everyone who let this happen.

Insanity is a severe mental disorder and State should be responsible for, in order to provide efficient assistance. Your freedom of thinking is harmless until the day it can hurt. I don't like to use safety belt in my car, as well I find too boring any rules, those about drones included. But, sense of community and rationality -- the reason, means to respect them. This comprehends to respect the others. Your freedom CANNOT prevail over the freedom of other people or the rights and civilized principles such as caring of patients with mental problems, even if apparently healthy because Psychiatry is a truly complex medical specialty. Let alone the whole invisible world behind. Respect common sense is an obligation of yours to see your right of free thinking to be respected as well. We're not living in the Germany of 30s. This applies for both ends. Got it? E : -) PS: Not only the State but also the sponsors are responsible for this tragedy. They created such a circus in this crazy world of profit where we all live in. A shame, a crime without punishment too. I do care about the world around me. It invariably concerns me. Or I just am an(other) accomplice. http://balua.org/mission-take-the-rooster-of-barcelos-into-near-space-by-marco-neiva/ Disclaimer: This is a project that was financed by a friend and business partner of mine, also stereographer (has worked with Peter Greenaway BTW IMDb LINK), no one had to be killed or was harmed (rooster included) to collaterally photograph and show the spherical reality as it is...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mad-mike-hughes-daredevil-and-flat-earth-theorist-killed-in-rocket-crash-2020-02-22/ How's this possible in the XXI century? Isn't there a limit for freedom of thinking? Flat earth theorist !?? Are they kidding me? Aren't there mental health authorities in US? I mean US, but could be anywhere else. Seems pretty clear to me, there's a border between common sense vs (plain/full) insanity. Why not to simply forbid this kind of acrobatics? Last time I heard there are rules for drones to fly... IMHO society (that is, all of us) represented by the State is responsible for such loss.

Or you put it in flight mode. Silent mode can yet compromise it from any radio interference anyway.

Good point, reason why a softer glass system if so or smoother 108MP results are really not so bad in the end... And that smearing is either or both processing and auto modes, very likely. Going manual or a 2nd shot as already said up there would probably lead to a different outcome ; ) Just a single sample says too little. A few others with the same devices will show up rather the opposite more often than you would guess. Count on it : -)

No idea if you're used to shoot with AI, I am : ) You can try a few shots, all will show to you different results in the end. That proves zero on the device properties : -) Don't put much expectation on Samsung unless you end to reduce it with some other tool like this one this thread's topic. Dennis @deezid as usual has nailed the whole thing. I'm sorry the others, but this user actually tops the average : -)

I've been struggling to have GLS to deliver a simple shipment from a supplier. They're basically becoming silent to not properly enter in touch with the consignee to handle the delivery as due. The seller worried about that has tried to obviously help to make it work, send me a link, I've fulfilled the blanks with an abbrev. version of the shipping address because seems the complete form doesn't match google maps tyranny over our lives and territorial organization structure of a country (Portugal) with the same borders for eight centuries now. I've only received silence from them so far (nothing about the seller, of course, 5-star instead let's be fair). Is this normal? Should we who pay the service accept this as natural and regular standard? So we pay and end to partially do the work of the service already paid by us in advance? Anyone out there with similar experiences to tell? PS: Time is money BTW ; -)

While we wait for March (news to follow up this update here), still from the previous model:

Still the best tiny capture device today in early 2020...

Once I have neither, popcorn moment to me now ; ) Please guys decide yourselves, one of you is wrong! :- D

You da AF man... ; -)

With ND filter: Grades then very smoothly:

In the meantime, here's the previous model -- no worries on those propellers there because there's always how to workaround it in a way or another:

Snapdragon 865 allows that, so far the only one branded there. They have different names whether global version or their native market. I believe Mi 10 and Mi 10 Pro models will have a different name when will come these days. Hence ends too confusing, I totally agree. It demands from us daily updating because of their endless launch announcements as well. Price target is our reward, though.

I'd bet, very likely, a bit of all that... LOL ; -)

Here is, Andrew, by the usual suspects ; -) https://www.dropbox.com/s/ywmxrdhf3nc6jbo/GFX100 Data Sheet 2.pdf Hope this helps, E : -)

Mi 10 Pro has Snapdragon 865 while OnePlus 7T series don't, without mention 108MP vs 48MP (40MP to Mate 30 Pro). A softer 108MP output doesn't bother me at all, on the contrary, I find the combo really useful to my taste for cinematic results. But the whole point is Camera2 API I still read contradictory information about its access on Mate 30 Pro or any other Huawei devices for now: https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/CameraKit https://consumer.huawei.com/en/community/details/Camera2api/topicId_18417/ https://consumer.huawei.com/en/community/details/[P30-Pro]-Support-level-for-Camera-2-API/topicId_6790/ Let alone U.S. block which can devote the brand to ostracism and own proprietary tools, unfortunately. But let's suppose there will be somewhat access, we mention in full or JUST partially? I wouldn't buy a smartphone without Camera2 API support, you use it once you won't look back.

Indeed! Bernie, my Portuguese partner in crime, is a proud NZ citizen from today on! Say congrats to him! Hail to him hey David @IronFilm ; -)

Welcome to the club! LOL : -)

OnePlus 7T or the newer Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro I'd rather buy not only because DxOMARK has rated it as the best smartphone camera system ever released. It won't break your bank account either as seems Samsung and Apple counterparts intend to in every single yearly launch.

It doesn't work at my side... Can't anyone post a print screen by Jove!?