AaronChicago

Aaron,  that does look spectacular.     Any video clips showing how that looks?

Very nice. Added an Osiris LUT with no other changes. Looks great!
 

Aaron, I took the family to the movie yesterday.  I thought it was a very good movie too.  I'm not a big fan of 3d but it delivered.  The pacing and story kept my interest.  Being shot on film, the look had a more dirty, organic texture than most of the digitally shot movies (Or it could have been my 3d glasses being dirty from me handling them with my greasy, 'popcorned' hands).   The acting, special effects, editing, etc. were all well done.  A sensible 8.2/10 rating on imdb.  Cheers. 

This movie looked like another POS summer blockbuster after seeing the trailer. Once I saw 93% on rotten tomatoes it got me interested. It ended up being one of the best movies Ive seen this year.

I used it today and like it. I wish they made a profile for Cinelike V low contrast.

Yes but someone has to manage and negotiate on behalf of the artists. Can you imagine the hassle that Google would have to go through negotiating rights with the individual artists by email!?

Glenn, not unexpected to be frustrated with a user interface after 1 day of use.
 
I've been using Premiere for 10 years and it still has annoyances ;)
 
But you get used to it believe me... I like it...Straight forward and quick. It's FCPX I couldn't get my head around. Maybe I'll try again one day.

awesome, thanks andrew!
 
regarding Premiere: i just love it. not having to render anything in after effects because i can just drop the ae project in the premiere timeline is just a killer feature. i tried fcpx for a while, but i couldnt get used to it. and i think i never will as it seems to be for people who edit something from the left to the right. i on the other hand drop the footage in different places and fill the gaps that are left. with this workflow using fcpx feels like i have to workaround everything i do. i just cant wrap my mind around why i cant just import a second video layer and move the footage freely. i dont want to connect this clip to any other clip. its so weird to me...

Fundamental, supplemental, totallymental...point is there are more than 2 ways to convey information in today's filmmaking.

Just finished this music video using the GH4 and BMPCC. 
 

The lighting and grade were killer.

But man does the BMPCC just LOVE to kick out that shitty magenta grid pattern when exposed to flares. :/

So you're using the BMPCC at 00:00:11, 00:00:14, 00:00:21 etc, with the back-lighting shots? Nice work!

Looks fantastic. 

Just finished this music video using the GH4 and BMPCC. 
 

Just finished this music video using the GH4 and BMPCC. 
 

My bet is on the EF to MFT Speedbooster.

My bet is on the EF to MFT Speedbooster.

This thread makes me dizzy.

For anyone interested in seeing a comparison of 4K with/without a Pro Mist filter check it out.
 
 

 

For anyone interested in seeing a comparison of 4K with/without a Pro Mist filter check it out.
 
 

 

For anyone interested in seeing a comparison of 4K with/without a Pro Mist filter check it out.
 
 

 

I'm a big fan of the Black Pro Mist 1/4. This week I plan to do a skintone test with the GH4 in 4K, with/without Black Pro Mist filter, to see how much softness it adds to an incredibly sharp picture.

You're right about shallow DOF being used to direct the audiences eye. You're wrong in saying that its just to hide bad lighting or framing.

You're right about shallow DOF being used to direct the audiences eye. You're wrong in saying that its just to hide bad lighting or framing.

Right on cue the BMC Users are declaring GH4 as "horrible" and "atrocious". I feel like a peace keeper because i love both!