Andrew Reid

This just in from John Brawley.

[media]http://vimeo.com/45682834[/media] [url="http://www.adorama.com/ISODSCRX100.html?KBID=66885"]Buy the RX100 at Adorama[/url] or [url="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=9&pub=5574929666&toolid=10001&campid=5336727214&customid=&icep_uq=rx100&icep_sellerId=&icep_ex_kw=&icep_sortBy=12&icep_catId=625&icep_minPrice=&icep_maxPrice=&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg"]Buy the RX100 on eBay[/url] The RX100 is a camera that fits in your jeans pocket. Would I consider intercutting RX100 footage with 1080p from a pro Super 35mm cinema camera? Yes I would. This should give you an idea of what a monumental achievement the technology of the RX100 is. [url="http://www.eoshd.com/content/8499/sony-rx100-review"]Read the full story here[/url]

I am really not (yet...) convinced. The sensor - S35, 4k, global shutter - does not exist in the camera yet as far as I can tell. And global shutter is too ambitious for the near future. It is not market ready tech yet. The machine vision sensors with global shutters are all small and compromise dynamic range & colour for the global readout. I'd rather have a fast rolling shutter than screw tonality and low light. It tells you something that the most expensive cinema cameras available today have rolling shutters as well - even the Sony F65, which has a mechanical shutter avoids global shutter. When it is market ready, the mythical sensor which is the headline spec of this camera, will be great. At $10,000, I'd rather wait and see what Sony come up with recorder wise for the FS700. So it is actually not even that unique. The FS700 has 14 stops of DR so I cannot see this being a whole new ball game. $3000 for raw 2.5K which isn't vapour ware is exciting (Blackmagic). This not so much! But good luck I hope it becomes reality... [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvI7rJ_AZys[/media]

It depends where Canon are positioning it. Above Rebel or below it? For me it would be frustrating to see a mirrorless below it in the range, because as we all realise - the mirrorless technology is the future and only the higher end products do it justice. It is bad for future technology like electronic shutter, EVF, etc. to not push this in a high end flagship. Canon will need this stuff for a full frame model eventually and they will be behind because they didn't see the value in pushing it, only the value of doing a "me-to" El Cheapo mirrorless camera for their girlfriends.

[img]http://www.eoshd.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/canon-mirrorless-af-d.jpg[/img] So far there's been a lot of speculation about the Canon mirrorless camera, which is due this month, having the same sensor as the G1X. This would be pretty disappointing as the sensor in that camera is based on 3 year old technology with a slow readout so the video mode was rather poor. Now the word on the street according to [url="http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/getting-closer-to-the-canon-event-aps-c-mirrorless-with-new-mount/"]Mirrorless Rumors[/url] is that Canon are (sensibly in my view!) opting for an APS-C sized sensor in the new camera, making it a better match to their EFS lenses which can be used via an adapter. The mount could also form the basis for a lower end pro video offering as APS-C is approximately Super 35mm sized in the film world. In my view it makes no sense to have a Four Thirds sized sensor in the Canon mirrorless because it will change the field of view of Canon's EFS lenses. I know the big attraction of using a Canon mirrorless is to still have that option of so much existing EFS glass. Canon't won't compromise that. The challenge with the APS-C sized sensor is similar to the one Sony faces with E-Mount on the NEX mirrorless system - making small lenses for it. Now Sony's consumer mirrorless mount also made its way onto their pro video cameras like the FS100 and FS700 so it would be a smart move for Canon to do a mirrorless lens mount supporting a Super 35mm sized sensor, which is similar to APS-C. Panasonic's mistake was to base their AF100 around a Micro Four Thirds lens mount, so that the lenses and sensor were not cinema standard in terms of field of view. When a DP uses a PL mount lens on a AF100 they cannot think in terms of standard Super 35mm focal lengths. I think if Canon push out a high end mirrorless system it could shoot great video, like the GH2. Anything less will be a disappointment, and a system based around a G1X with interchangeable lenses will be a Nikon 1 series like disaster. I'm currently using the Sony RX100 and that is effectively a replacement for several important rival cameras - the Canon G1X, S100, Fuji X10, Nikon J1, V1 and even Sony's own lower end NEX mirrorless cameras for certain people. Video on it is very good too. Review soon! [url="http://www.eoshd.com/content/8494/canon-mirrorless-to-feature-aps-c-sensor-according-to-sources"]Read the full story here[/url]

The Micro Four Thirds kit lenses are the best kit lenses. Far better than what you get as standard with Canon and Nikon low end. I have a $199 Olympus 40-150mm telephoto, the stabiliser when used in-body with the E-M5 is better than with the $800 100-300mm Panasonic OIS.

10x more expensive... That is supply and demand for you :) What a bugger. The Iscoramas used to go for £200. I got my Centa Vision 2x for £100, from someone bored of using it to project things against a wall. I've been searching for the same ever since but eBay's completed items search ruins it all!!

It is the OIS. It can occasionally 'leap' and then settle. It isn't perfect on that lens, nor is the rubber grip on the zoom barrel which tends to come loose. Unless you really need the zoom in one unit with such coverage, please do yourself a favour and sell it for some decent fast primes. Shooting at F14 on such a nice large sensor is rather pointless as is the slow F4 end, and you may as well get a camcorder!

As an all round cinema shooter, no it is not worth replacing a GH2. But as a stills shooter and handheld footage camera with no rig, it is far better in those respects. Also the OLED screen, handling, build quality, weather proofing and EVF certainly shame the GH2.

[quote name='QuickHitRecord' timestamp='1341927288' post='13681'] Looks good. Though, the view counts are going through the roof. Was it not counting views by non-member guests before? [/quote] No, only counted member views before.

[quote name='jdv' timestamp='1341942210' post='13699'] Hey guys - first post for me - I have a question: Why not just buy the Sony VG-20? While it doesn't have the scene color selections of the 5N, it's a proper video camera. I have one, and it's a fun little beast. Far as overheating goes, I shot a Memorial Day dedication in record setting heat with one - in the sun - and not a single issue. Having come over from a Canon DSLR I can tell you that I was very impressed with that. Here's the footage for what it's worth (they called me to shoot it literally an hour before hand, so I ran out the door w/o my dead cat... which helps explain the spotty sound): [/quote] The VG-20 retails for 3x more. Inside is the same sensor and image processor as the NEX 5N. When I first tried it out at the IFA in Berlin last year, I slated it because... A) The build quality was very suspect. HDMI socket had broke after a day on the demo model B) The control layout felt less intuitive than a DSLR, yet that was mostly what you were paying the significant extra money for C) The image didn't benefit from anything extra for your 3x more... That was pretty inexcusable. D) Didn't like the form factor... unnecessarily trad-video and very very plasticy I don't love the VG-20, but I do love the NEX 5N and 7. Best bang for buck along with the GH2 at the moment.

The in-body stabiliser is so good it takes the place of a rig sometimes. Even with a dirt cheap kit lens like the 40-150mm it performs better than the OIS on a $2000 Canon L lens. I'm not exaggerating. My review has been somewhat delayed because I got so immersed in shooting a project with it and I want both the footage and review to come out at the same time. Stay tuned. Thanks for posting.

Really? Shows 6, now 7 for me. Try clearing your browser cache...

Did you get yours on eBay? I'm trying to find one of those at the moment. Very interesting little lens and 1.75x pretty much unheard of.

[quote name='Zohannes' timestamp='1341901497' post='13657'] nice work richard, i stopped using my NEX5N on 'proper' shoots because of overheating (mainly - switched to a GH2 then) and also ergonomics but it looks like you solved both of these. kinda looks like a baby RED. Do you plan on developing the same system for GH2? Im in South Africa and everyone is completely biased towards Canon so it is hard to find any support/gear for Sony or Panasonic. I guess i will be keen to get a kit for both systems.. [/quote] I believe Richard is waiting to see what form the GH3 takes but let's see what he says about a possible GH2 mod. Until then you can use the ReWo cage.

Please login anyway to get your full profile and functionality back as you are showing as a guest and guests won't be able to post in a few hours when I fix that bug :)

Fixed Tony. Are you logged in BTW?

Mattebox? Not sure but it is neat and tidy

Have you noticed the change? [url="http://www.eoshd.com/forum/index.php?/forum/4-the-eoshd-forum/"]Go here to join the discussion on the amazing new EOSHD forum[/url] [url="http://www.eoshd.com/content/8437/new-eoshd-forum-launched"]Read the full story here[/url]

Welcome to the new forum. You will need to login again. If you have forgotten your login details, you can login with Facebook or Twitter. In the unlikely event you have any problems with the forum please let me know either with a reply below, or by email. Cheers! Andrew EOSHD.com

[quote author=ed_lee83 link=topic=956.msg7013#msg7013 date=1341848180] OK wow! Interesting cooling techniques. The 1,500 pound kit also includes the anamorphic adapter? Richard, how about an external power solution? What's the longest recording tally before it overheats? thanks and good work!! [/quote] I really like the way he's used that filter holder on the Century anamorphic. Great for slotting in NDs?

[quote author=Another Andrew link=topic=956.msg7010#msg7010 date=1341847656] £15,000 is a bit steep... Think I'll stick to the C300! [/quote] Sorry must have got the pricing the same way Canon did... Typo with an extra zero. Corrected!

Here it is... http://www.eoshd.com/content/8392/mystery-camera-revealed-sony-nex-5n-in-cine-housing-with-cooling-mod

[html][img]http://www.eoshd.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/DSC03151.jpg[/img] [url="http://www.eoshd.com/comments/index.php/topic,956.0.html"]If you are interested in getting one, please let Richard know on the forum…[/url] Richard Gale emailed me a few days ago to tell me about his cinema housing for the NEX 5N. And here it is. Richard tells EOSHD more about the housing after the break – how it improves the NEX 5N and how he intends to price it. [url="http://www.eoshd.com/content/8392/mystery-camera-revealed-sony-nex-5n-in-cine-housing-with-cooling-mod/"]Read full article[/url] [/html]

A lens actually designed for creamy bokeh, nice find. Thanks for pointing that out. 135mm F2.8 is one of my favourite looking lenses on full frame. Looks like 85mm F1.4 on the GH2 which I use a lot.