MaverickTRD
-
Posts
8 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from EthanAlexander in Canon EOS M6 Mark II
I’ve never had an account in here. Just lurked.
But I finally had to sign up. Some of us grow so tired of reading your repetitive assumptions, theories, and misguided opinions.
No one in their right mind thinks canon removed 24p to save a bit of money.
Furthermore the license fees fees have an annual cap. Once a company hits that cap it can’t cost them more. I imagine big companies that manufacture video equipment using these codecs hit that cap regularly
please stop repeating the same terrible excuse every page
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from Topcat in Canon EOS M6 Mark II 4K is "pixel binned 3K" and Sony A6600 old sensor debacle "due to internal politics"
I’d hold off on canon apsc as their sensors are technically smaller than Sony and Fuji apsc so the size difference between it and what you have isn’t really that huge. Especially once the canon crops in (if it does in 4K)
i imagine even a speed booster on ur current body would generate better imagery
-
MaverickTRD reacted to Andrew Reid in NOPE! Canon did NOT remove 24p from the 90D and EOS M6 II to save H.264 licensing fees
He's still going...
Holy fuck.
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from tokyojerry in Canon EOS M6 Mark II 4K is "pixel binned 3K" and Sony A6600 old sensor debacle "due to internal politics"
I’d hold off on canon apsc as their sensors are technically smaller than Sony and Fuji apsc so the size difference between it and what you have isn’t really that huge. Especially once the canon crops in (if it does in 4K)
i imagine even a speed booster on ur current body would generate better imagery
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from Mako Sports in Canon EOS M6 Mark II
I’ve never had an account in here. Just lurked.
But I finally had to sign up. Some of us grow so tired of reading your repetitive assumptions, theories, and misguided opinions.
No one in their right mind thinks canon removed 24p to save a bit of money.
Furthermore the license fees fees have an annual cap. Once a company hits that cap it can’t cost them more. I imagine big companies that manufacture video equipment using these codecs hit that cap regularly
please stop repeating the same terrible excuse every page
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from newfoundmass in Canon EOS M6 Mark II
I’ve never had an account in here. Just lurked.
But I finally had to sign up. Some of us grow so tired of reading your repetitive assumptions, theories, and misguided opinions.
No one in their right mind thinks canon removed 24p to save a bit of money.
Furthermore the license fees fees have an annual cap. Once a company hits that cap it can’t cost them more. I imagine big companies that manufacture video equipment using these codecs hit that cap regularly
please stop repeating the same terrible excuse every page
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from Thomas Hill in Canon EOS M6 Mark II
I’ve never had an account in here. Just lurked.
But I finally had to sign up. Some of us grow so tired of reading your repetitive assumptions, theories, and misguided opinions.
No one in their right mind thinks canon removed 24p to save a bit of money.
Furthermore the license fees fees have an annual cap. Once a company hits that cap it can’t cost them more. I imagine big companies that manufacture video equipment using these codecs hit that cap regularly
please stop repeating the same terrible excuse every page
-
MaverickTRD got a reaction from Andrew Reid in Canon EOS M6 Mark II
I’ve never had an account in here. Just lurked.
But I finally had to sign up. Some of us grow so tired of reading your repetitive assumptions, theories, and misguided opinions.
No one in their right mind thinks canon removed 24p to save a bit of money.
Furthermore the license fees fees have an annual cap. Once a company hits that cap it can’t cost them more. I imagine big companies that manufacture video equipment using these codecs hit that cap regularly
please stop repeating the same terrible excuse every page