Jump to content

andrew_dotdot

Members
  • Content Count

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About andrew_dotdot

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday January 5

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Stockholm
  • Interests
    Documentary filmmaking, ice hockey.
  • My cameras and kit
    Canon 5D3, Fuji X-T3, Fringer EF-FX Pro

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    www.articom.se
  • Instagram
    instagram.com/articom_images

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. This. He called it a test for "out-of-the-box profiles" and they both looked terrible. The user who doesn't want to mess around in the menus will be lot happier with the results from an iPhone or Galaxy than with either one of these cameras.
  2. I believe resolve also has a Paste Attributes-style function in the context menu for this kind of thing.
  3. Is this the same thing?
  4. Yeah, I tried it with my new PD power bank and compared it to my old “regular” power bank and it was the same thing. I moved the audio cables around to try to see if/where there was some interference coming in there, but I never heard it change. I’m going to rebuild it one time just to see if it was a fluke. If it changes, I’ll post again.
  5. Yeah, it’s that excruciating trade-offs game. I do documentary and have a policy that if it’s ‘on sticks’ it’s raw. That’d be the use case for the BMPCC4K for me, but the 5D3 floats the boat there. But the 70D was routinely fell short in picture quality as the on-the-move camera leveraging the AF. There’s no doubt the DPAF in the 70D I sold, or a client’s C100mkII that I often use, is a lot better than the AF-C mode in the Fuji. If the EOS-R had entered the market with better video specs, I might well have plonked down the cash and gone over budget for it. Then again, just this morning I res’ed up a project from the 8-bit proxies to the Fuji’s UHD h.265 10-bit originals got a FHD render back out that was pleasantly comparable to the 5D3 ML raw in a way that the 8-bit footage from the 70D never ever was was. But here, if I’d been shooting BRAW I might not even have needed to make proxies, and how nice would that have been? And there closes the “circle of compromises “. Best not to think about it too much and just get on with it!
  6. I sold a couple lesser Canons (incl. a 70D) to buy an X-T3 to pair with my 5D3 on ML. The BMPCC4K was never really an option for me due to lack of autofocus. I'm looking forward to hearing what you come through to. I'm feeling very jealous about BRAW when you describe it.
  7. Is that old one the "95MB/s" card? -- I have a 64GB one of those, which I was pretty sure worked with all codecs, but I didn't dare put it on my list, since I'm at the office and the card's at home and I wasn't 100% sure it was the 95. If that's so, then I can agree with you, it has worked for me on the 400Mbit/sec codecs.
  8. I have one of these that I bought to go with the camera: Sony 128GB M Series UHS-II SDXC Memory Card (U3) And I had one of these (like @Attila Bakos), which works just as well for all codecs and data rates as the above in my experience: SanDisk Extreme Pro SDXC V30 128GB 170MB/s A card to definitely avoid is the SanDisk Ultra 80MB/s, which only works with data rates up to 100Mbits/s. I had a bunch of these for codec recording on Canon DSLRs. What those "Ultra" cards do turn out to be good for, though (on a semi-related note) is for filming when the footage is going into my iPad Pro for quick editing in Luma Fusion. Apple has nerfed the iPads direct-import-from-SD-card capabilities to only accept up to 100Mbit/sec h.264 and 50Mbit/s h.265 -- all of which work comfortably with those cards. The iPad will edit better data rates than that, but you're forced to go via iTunes or other bad workarounds to get the clips onto the device.
  9. A weird use case, but something to be aware of: I was using a Tascam DR-60D mk2 to record audio, and then feeding the audio from the dedicated line out ("camera high") into the mic input of the X-T3. Worked great until I decided to use the same power bank to supply juice to both the camera and the recorder. Everything was still great on the Tascam's audio, but the audio on the X-T3 had a weird data warble noise clearly audiable -- something between a modem or fax, and a mobile phone interference noise. Unplugging either of them from the power bank made the problem go away. It happened with my nice new PD-compatible battery, and with an older big power bank I have. Works fine with them plugged into separate power banks, but it would have been nice to power the whole rig from a single battery.
  10. “Shot a water sports festival with X-T3, hugely empowered by the enhanced face detection in the latest firmware, face select also came in handy when switching subject. F-log, HEVC 400Mbps LongGOP, sharpness and NR -4, custom WB” @androidlad — Curious here: Seems like you must have been shooting 4K (or DCI) at sub-30 FPS to use HEVC, LongGOP and 400Mbps. How did you decide to go for LongGOP versus ALL-I @ 400Mbps?
  11. Yep. I'm all up to date on the fw, and all the lenses are on Fringer's supported list. So it was all a bit disappointing for me -- though I'd never used lenses with an adapter before. I didn't know what to expect, and I thought it was all part of the deal. In similar conditions, those L lenses' AF is really reliable on a Canon body. They were super on the 70D, and still bringing home the bacon on the 5D3. 😄
  12. I still use the Canon lenses I mentioned on a 5D3 with magic lantern when the scene is on a tripod, but the 5D3 doesn't have continuous video AF at all. (That's what I have the Fuji for, y'know?) For 'S' autofocus, à la the 5D3, the autofocus of the Fuji with an adapter is slow, but then it doesn't make that much of a difference. It eventually focuses and that is it until you ask it to refocus. The OP didn't really say what his use case is.
  13. @thephoenix >> Just curious - what Canon body do you have? Mine was a 70D for any auto-focus-style work (which I sold to fund the X-T3). I was really surprised to read your experience, since mine was just the opposite — same lenses had wildly different performance on the Canon vs the Fuji body for me.
  14. I’ve got the Fringer EF-X Pro1 and I can tell you it’s not great for video. I only do video with the X-T3. It can take a second or two to acquire focus. Then, for thin DOF shots in “C” mode, it will “micro-hunt” quite a lot while shooting. I have a button assigned to focus-lock to kill that during a shot. I have used it with the 24-105 f4L and the 70-200 f2.8L, and a bit with the 50mm f1.8 STM lenses that I already had, and wasn’t satisfied. As salt in the wound, it ignores the focus sensitivity and speed settings in the camera. It will shift focus as fast as it can, no matter what the camera-menu settings. I now use the Fuji 18-55mm and 10-20mm stabilized lenses for video. They’re good lenses, and I’ve been satisfied with the AF performance in run-and-gun situations, whereas I’ve pulled my hair out using the Fringer adapter and my wonderful Canon glass.
  15. Perfect! Good that you clear this up. (Aw, nuts! I wanted to change my post above, but it was too old now.)
×
×
  • Create New...