thephoenix

i had 10% on mine, just monitored price on amazon and it dropped one day, bought it, the next day it was back to it's original price

prices look tight ?

easy, you go to b&h website and you select stabilized in the lenses left menu

On 10/21/2018 at 10:16 PM, currensheldon said:

Don't get my hopes up

But man, an X-T3 collection of features + IBIS + electronic ND + some sort of xlr-adapter would be my dream camera. Even make it the same size as the GFX-50, and that'd be fine. 

 

 

just add internal 10 bit 422 recording

for video i am afraid you have to go for stabilized lenses.

such a shame the 16-55 isn't

the walking dead camera ?

1 hour ago, Kisaha said:

True. So we need an IR filter for the Pocket?

Are there any combination of an IR+polarizer or ND that could do the job?

I am still in the search for a perfect vari ND and I am willing to pay good money for a 6 stop one if it has a neutral color.

Does anyone know the Breakthrough Photography X4 ND? Is a few hundrends of euros "investement", so I do not want to make that wrong.

 

heliopan have good reputation

same for me. crispy sharpeness is not cinematic to me

weird as it does work in the video with the same lens. you have first version or G2 ?

no but always better to have proper colors when shooting

because it is better to have a screen that is properly calibrated

2 minutes ago, austinchimp said:

Interesting info, thanks. Do you have a source for this? I haven't seen anything about this.

i was lazy not giving you the link but here it is

hi all

planning to buy the ninja V.

of course i will need to calibrate the screen and i've found that i need this cable https://www.xritephoto.eu/atomos-calibration-cable-usb-to-serial.html

in order to do it.

question is: do you know any "noname" cable i can use ? because this price for a simple cable.. come on !!

2 hours ago, austinchimp said:

I've tried the Viltrox with mixed results, have a Fringer on order. I'm hoping the Fringer will have better lens compatibility, make my Canon lens' IS function properly, and have faster autofocus. Otherwise I'll send it back and keep the Viltrox. I do like how responsive Fringer seem to be regarding firmware updates.

for the viltrox it seems that you have to downgrade the firmware to get proper is. at least that is what happening with bm4k, maybe the same with fuji.

i like that

http://www.wise-advanced.com.tw/pro/pro-ssd.html

interresting for viltrox users and lens is

it is really weird or a terrible mistake that the weebill doesn't handle properly the bm4k.

the camera was announced like 6 monthes ago so as the price they could have figured out it was going to be a success

and tell us which adapter you will use.  i am interested as i have this glass too

he did another test

i think the weebil has to work with the bm4k, the market is too big to ignore it and they could prepare for 6 month knowing the bm4k was gonna be released

anyway looking forward for more tests of the moza air 2  and air x as well as the tilta

don't know about af with the metabone, all i know is that i want to keep being able to use all my canon lenses but do not want to suffer from crop factor ?

metabones does one but not sure it's greater than others.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1049207-REG/metabones_mbspfd_x_bm1_canon_fd_lens_to.html

i've read that they are working on new one but didn't find any real confirmation

2 minutes ago, austinchimp said:

I'm not sure that's available to buy yet. Personally I've also ordered the Fringer to see if it's better than the Viltrox. There are a few quirks with the Viltrox that I'm not happy with. It struggles to focus on some lenses at maximum zoom length, and also with my Canon 70-200 F4 the stabilisation switches off after a few seconds even if I'm recording. I'm going to test both and decide which to keep.

The Fringer seems to have very good support and frequent updates, so I'm hopeful they will have sorted out some of the kinks. Having said that, it is more than twice the price of the Viltrox!

problem is that the fringer does not reduces focal length

anyone tested this http://www.viltrox.com/en/index.php?m=index&a=show&cid=145&id=227

cannot find much informations about it