-
Posts
1,015 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Posts posted by thephoenix
-
-
i am not comparing i am just saying it lacks stab, that is my opinion
of course you don't need it when using tripod, using slider, hmm it depends on the build quality, dolly same story, there are many that shake the camera
and why comparing with red or expensive products ?
comparing a 1500$ camera with some 15k$ others is a nonsense as the equipment are not the same and the way you work with it and the team around are not the same.
for gimballs many prefer to use them with stabilized lenses or body in order to avoid jittering.
this camera is the kind you want to use handheld sometimes, expecialy with the great af, having a stabilized lense would be such a great thing
-
grading is really important to have the film look.
globaly to me the main weakness of fuji are the lenses, they are not stabilized, and that is quite a problem for video especialy when you have such a great af system.
fuji need to upgrade their lenses if they want to make it big on the video market
-
24 minutes ago, Kisaha said:
And 2.8f, and no IS.
Not the modern workhorse lens that everyone else has.
i have to agree, it's about time that fuji goes to stabilization
great lens but not perfect, like the canon 24-70
-
5 hours ago, Cameramoto said:
I bought the Viltrox and IS (image stabilisation) is not supported. Autofocus doesn’t always work on all lenses. So I sent it back. I’m waiting for the fringer ef-fx pro to test it.
i am afraid all adapter / converters won't do a proper job with af.
it was said that metabones is working on new speedbooster, hope this is true.
i was planning on using adapters as i have a full set of canon lenses but got myself into buying a 16-55 fuji yesterday as i found a terrific deal on local amazon.
still wondering if i will use it as there is no stabilization but on tripod it will be great. at least it will be perfect for photography and for video on tripod or on gimball
but i'd rather use my tamron 24-70 that has stab when someone comes with a proper speedbooster
-
a bit silly he doesn't test the eye focus on video mode but this a test
-
wonder if the af remains brillant with the viltrox and other brands af
-
still looking for a review or advice for a good canon to fuji adapter
-
-
real info is that it is coming on early 2019
-
fresh
-
32 is much much better on laptop where cpu and gc are weakest than on desktop
-
this thread is going nowhere...
-
1 hour ago, Grégory LEROY said:
It cost more than 5OO USD in the European Union.
i assume you are french.
there are deals on olympus like -100€ on the body https://www.olympus.fr/site/fr/c/cameras/om_d_system_cameras/om_d/e_m10_mark_iii/index.html?icid=WinterBonus-2018-ClaimLP-Link-Product1
if you buy without vat like all pro do then it is a good deal as it ends a 465€
-
more cores are better, vega is better for resolve too
-
interresting talk about noise raw and prores
-
my link was not exactly the same, it is just the cable
-
-
45 minutes ago, Anaconda_ said:
And that's one of them - the higher capacity one. Save people watching a whole video just to find out what battery he's using
watch the video and you'll see he is not only using an external battery but he his making his own cord to plug it into the power plug
i was talking about a hack, not a use
-
the answer is in your question.
how do you want us to know in what light iso lens and so on conditions you are gonna shoot.
basicaly you need a set of nd filters, not only one do it all except if it is variable
-
42 minutes ago, Anaconda_ said:
? the link is in his video... actually he posts 2 batteries links
-
interresting battery hack at 1'50"
-
-
-
update:
bought my cpu, it's gonna be a threadripper 1920x, thanks black friday deals.
now i have to find parts that are gonna go with it
Fuji X-T3 and X-T4 discussion
In: Cameras
Posted
didn't know stabilized lenses were crap ?
when it's well done they are as good as non stabilized ones and yet you still have the choice to turn it off