Jump to content

nathlas

Members
  • Posts

    177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nathlas

  1. I really believe that when you belong to a proffesional cast you should never leave suspicions about your competitors. What you need to do is do your job as best you can and that will be what will bring your customer / viewer to you instead of your competitors. It is called professional discretion. I would never allowed such a thread to my crown/forum.
  2. It doesn't matter. If he decided that for his kind of jobs that camera suits him fine why not ? I don't have a problem to use any kind of camera in my job. But I will rarely pretend that a camera suits me if it will cause me more problems than using a more suitable solution. Sigma FP L is a fine camera from a superb company and I really hope that they will try improve that in the future and not abandon that project. But this specific camera is not of any really professional usefall use as it is.
  3. I wouldn't say he is a Sony guy. He is using BM cameras as well and he seems always loyal to simplicityon working sets. He offered not to release his opinion on FP-L as he knew that he couldn't hide the truth he discovered. That's very fair for him and honorable for Sigma that didn;t try to cover up his gray opinion. I trully respect him.
  4. Because he feels that wat I suppose. Since he realises all those negatives specs according to the price why not tell that ? He is not working for them. I feel gratefull that there are few like him to stand really neutral on marketing . Anyway he proposed which is the right way for this camera to have a chance in market. Sigma has to drastically decrease price as at this range there are better cameras to spend your money.
  5. Too thick and bulky. They could build a thinner option .
  6. nathlas

    BMPCC 6k PRO!?

    Maybe admins could rename that thread in order we could locate that more easily ?
  7. 1) How's evf experience in terms of opticals ? like a sony A73 ? better? worst ? 2) How're builded NDs in terms of mechanism ? Seems pro enough ?
  8. nathlas

    R5 vs R6

    High iso / low light capability ? Is there a difference to mention ?
  9. Perhaps they have gone indeed back to redesign that . Especially against S1H. Ι believe R5 was a surprise for them.
  10. Ι can understand the love for such a lens. But not using that on a modern camera. CA seems terrible.
  11. nathlas

    RED Komodo

    And Canon battery usage as well. I notice that Canon released C300 III with an EF mount not a RF . They would obviously see the Komodo's chance in market before they abandon the popular EF mount.
  12. Ι would love to see who is going to be successfull on focus on 8κ in a FF camera Unless AF is superb this combination will be a hell.
  13. Last ping pong was among S1 adn S1H . Now seems R5 is on finals and making Sony get better
  14. Αpart R5 a BM 8k is beeing develoled If Canon also enters the 8k arena with cine cameras as well I foresee 8k avalanche the next two years.
  15. Αll foveon users I have asked ( I also use previous foveon system) prefer SD1 instead of all Quattro bricks. Just a thought.
  16. And MFT. They would have sold thousands of that lens in MFT ....surely more than fuji X mount
  17. They allready have just not in every mount yet https://cvp.com/manufacturer/fujinon
  18. Sure but it can be operated easily by one user only. Superb camera.
  19. Ι had same thoughts so many times. Then I have a look on this comparison and forget everything.
  20. Too expensive. Normally a set like that (even if 65mm is missing) costs half of that price in market. I just hope they will go on and not give up as there is some time they didn't release a new video. They are in my top 3 technical youtubers anyway for many months now.
  21. I would pay the difference only for manual focus clutch that olympus PRO have. I can't comply with focus by wire only lenses
  22. I bought it 1230$ plus taxes last month (adapter kit) Since mark II is coming this is typical.
×
×
  • Create New...