Jump to content

berndimax

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from lucabutera in Petition for Samsung NX1 hack   
    Where did You get that from?
    From MediaInfo on NX1 clip: 3840x2160 HEVC (Main @ Level 5.1)!
  2. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from kidzrevil in Petition for Samsung NX1 hack   
    Your math is wrong. The crop factor has nothing to do with the bitrate. Both cams: 3840x2160! NX1 at  80 Mbps, NX500 at 70 Mbps.
  3. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from Marco Tecno in Petition for Samsung NX1 hack   
    Your math is wrong. The crop factor has nothing to do with the bitrate. Both cams: 3840x2160! NX1 at  80 Mbps, NX500 at 70 Mbps.
  4. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from Marco Tecno in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  5. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from dhso22 in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  6. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from John Matthews in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    When I went through the file frame by frame in avidemux, I counted 29 P-frames in a row, but mediainfo reported a GOP of 15 as you said.
    I don´t know if avidemux shows it right.
     
    Go to Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-adaptive_binary_arithmetic_coding
     
  7. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from tomastancredi in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  8. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from MattH in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  9. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from John Matthews in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  10. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from Vladimir in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
  11. Like
    berndimax got a reaction from Nikkor in The 4K Fuji X-T2 is here   
    Hello,
    I`m new to this forum, but a long term reader, because it is the best forum for information about NX1 (which I own).
    The Fuji got my interest for its pleasing colours.
    I downloaded two original files from http://www.dkamera.de/news/preview-beispielaufnahmen-der-fujifilm-x-t2/
    and discovered, that the codec implemantation may not be very good.
    It uses a "High L5.1" variation of mp4 at 102 Mbps with no CABAC and no B-frames unlike for example Sony RX100IV etc.
    One I-frame followed by 30 P-frames according to mediainfo and avidemux.
    Just like smartphones, but at a higher bitrate.
×
×
  • Create New...