Jump to content

JurijTurnsek

Members
  • Posts

    596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JurijTurnsek

  1. It's a great deal, but there's little point to buying into a dead system imo.

    For that price it is quite worth it. If you shoot video, chances are you are going to use adapters to adapt  let's say Samyang's EF Cine lenses that you can then use on the next system you migrate to. 4K should last you 6-8 years at least, unless you need higher frame-rates. All of the other specs are top notch and will remain very good for a long while.

  2. Now that we know overcoming heat issues is possible via firmware with recording 4k internally can anyone explain why sony can't do the same with the original a7s? Other than the obvious: sell more a7sii's

    There is no way of doing this without pissing off many, many Atomos Shogun owners. Also, would you be happy knowing you had a 4K body all this time, but were "locked out" of the feature?

  3. On this subject, anyone have good experiences with 3rd party batteries? I want to get 2 extra and don't really want to be paying Sony prices.

    I got some completely no brand batteries and the problem with them is that they do not communicate the left-over charge too precisely. This means that if you are at around 30% and you are doing a longer take (5+ mins) the battery might die unexpectedly and the whole video files is lost. If you get a low charge warning with the original battery, it writes the file before it dies (this is using Sony NEX-5N).

  4. The market is basically flooding with used a7s cameras. And no one is buying.

    It is time to upgrade. Looks like they all made enough money with their a7s that they can afford the mark II. The same will happen when Canon releases 5DIV. And where I am from, used a7s are being bought, since they are still incredible tools.

  5. Where I live a used 5dmkiii still costs more than a brand new d750. A used a7s costs not even half.

    I would say that this is down to public company image, which takes a long time to change. Probably until you reach a tipping point where a large enough percentage of users want to jump ship and the market is flooded with used bodies. Right now, the shift is happening at a slow pace, but it is happening.

  6. You guys are missing the point. This is not aimed at the video crowd. This is meant to be the next step in smartphone photography and I applaud it. The form-factor is there, now we just nee to wait a few iterations for the hardware to be perfected. And obviously, a mobile chip can be added easily, but battery life is probably a big issue with the first generation.

    You probably heard of multi shot noise reduction - burst of shots to reduce noise. Now imagine using multiple sensors and the same principle is applicable to moving subjects since they all fire at the same time. Also the slight difference in the capture angle gives info on the 3D characteristics enabling more realistic software bokeh?

    The difference of this and Lytro? This could just replace your smartphone while Lytro would replace your camera - and camera sales are declining. Also Lytro sacrifices so much resolution for a single trick (refocusing). I believe this will leave Lytro in the dust.

  7. Very good question. On the better camera in phones argument, I have always wondered why they don't have faster lenses (f1.4?) on mobile phones, along with built-in ND filters? The f1.4 zoom idea sounds great. Or they should let users just buy and adapt better lenses on mobile phones, amd sell them separately. Why should we be stuck with fixed f2.0 lenses with tiny sensors. It's terrible. Especially at night. 

     

    The sensor on the new Nexus 5x and 6p does 12.35 MP 12 Bit at 35 fps, 4k at 60p and 2k at 120fps. I guess the Snapdeagon 810 in the 6p may be able to handle a hack pushing up data rates, to capture more information. But I wonder if it will be able to do RAW at 30 or 35 fps without burning  (exploding in the case of the Snapdragon 810). 

     

    I'm pretty sure that all manufacturers want a slim, flat phone with no bump for the camera module. It's a shame really, they are all competing within these restrictions of not standing out (yes, even Apple) and going for that golden profit margin to sales ratio. Kudos to Nokia for their Pureview phone - now bring it back with 4K and Android!

  8. True, my xc10 is roughly the size of an rx10ii, same sensor size, shots a substantially higher bitrate. No over heating.

    Reason: Fan

    It seems to me that they simply aren't very good at heat disposal. Maybe there is a patent issue involved.

    An example is my Sony Z3 phone. When you record 4k video a warning shows up that says you can only record a few minutes then it will need to shut of and cool. This is how its intended to work (or not work).

    My LG on the other hand, which is known as a phone that easily gets hot, does not have such a warning nor problem. It can even record 4k in 200Mbps and doesnt heat up nearly as quick as the Sony.

    Just a theory.

    Ok, so why not do a fan mod if you are a videographer and leave the bearbones version to the photographers (the intended market) - talking about a7rII, RX100II does not shutdown AFAIK?

    Your Z3 is waterproof (to an extent) while your LG is not. Heat dissipation is a compromise made for this - my GF has a Z3 compact and she never recorded 4K until is would overheat and I doubt many phone clips are really long. Sony's betting that a working phone is better than a water-damaged 4K-forever-filming phone. But then again, you would probably learn about this reading any review of the phone before buying.

  9. Well, there goes my A7s for sale. Goddayum the price drops on these Sony cameras are crazy. My 5d III is still almost same price as I bought it years ago

    Because a successor is not on the horizon, while Sony's is already announced. Blame Canon for slow product iteration.

×
×
  • Create New...