miguel

Beautiful work, congratulations

Yeah, you're right. I really didn't intend to imply that the target for the G lenses was the same as the a6300. It's just that from my budget constrained amateurish perspective I really wished (and been wishing) that Sony had focused on those issues (stabilization, color, better ergonomics, good for the price lenses) instead of the other features.

No in-camera stabilization, no twin dials, no mention of better color rendering, expensive lenses without IS, weak budget lenses compared to other systems...for a company known for pushing the envelope, Sony is persistently deaf.

Findings by a recently published study carried out by the BBC. The subjetive evaluation surpasses the objetive one, which is not all common (via Hacker News). http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2016/01/h-dot-265-slash-hevc-vs-h-dot-264-slash-avc-50-percent-bit-rate-savings-verified

Great work. Kinda of reminded me of some of the stuff Woody Allen used to do. On the technical-camera side of it, I did get distracted by the jello, specially on the subway scenes.

"Canon like colours" with GH4 resolution. That's a great image. I know I'm being petty, but I wish they would put some thought on the emotional-design of the thing. It looks too much like a home appliance...

As recounted by the participants themselves. I always find this sort of stories fascinating, so I decided to share. http://grantland.com/features/boogie-nights/

Nice and very useful perspective, thanks Peter.

Hi. I'm new to the forum, but I've been a reader to the blog for a while now. Congratulations for the great work you do here. I generally find the colours on Panasonic cameras to be a little artificial out of the camera (as many members of the community do). In the video the skin tones vary a lot (compare 1:11 vs 1:14). There seems to be a lot of magenta in some shots. Are those from the LX100?