kidzrevil

It absolutely would especially at 6400 iso where the noise is eating most of those 8 bits...

@canonlyme the Canon 5d has a maximum DR of 11.3 and you can expect at least 2 stops in the shadows to be all noise. I say the 5D has 8-10 usable stops of DR so even in raw you are limited.

Does anyone use mlv_dmp ? I for the life of me cant get it to work ! I know you need it to take advantage of the 4K features ? is there an alternative ?

exactly why I bought a 1.33x anamorphic. The gain in spatial resolution makes sense for a 1080p camera

Voigtlander 40mm f2 & 28mm f2.8 with Canon EF speedbooster on Sony A6500. Tiffen black satin 1&2 used for filtration and graded with digilogcolor.com LUT

@JordanWright yeah ! Im using a black pro mist and black diffusion fx ! I love the yellowing of the Taks glass it acts as a warming/amber filter built into the glass

Asahi Super Takumar 35,55,85 & 105mm w/ digicolor.com LUT

@mercer 48fps ??? gotta try that

@Gregormannschaft gorgeous capture as always ! Makes me want to get some fd glass again this is beautiful

@canonlyme dude I LOVE them ! I started using just the vintage lenses unfiltered like you do though. The character of old glass sometimes is more appealing than the filter

@kaylee its worked wonders for me, try it out ! It makes a neat little color profile based on your displays output measurements

Get a spyder elite it works wonders

@TheRenaissanceMan the glimmer glass is great. The black satin is like it too just with an edge diffusion pattern. The glimmer glass even at its heaviest grades doesnt’t soften too much

@canonlyme lovely low contrast rendering on those lenses. @Emanuel ?? it was shot with a Canon 5D mark iii in ml raw with tiffen pearlescent filter upscaled to 4k

What was bad about Black Panther ? The acting ? The casting ? Curious to know. Interesting trailer btw. For some reason it reminded me of Mindhunter. But for what its worth the sub text of this article is pretty revealing...

Correct. How the cameras sensor reacts to light is its innate look. Each sensor is sensitive to light in different ways. The best part about RAW imo is you can now manipulate the large pallette of colors the cameras sensor can see to your desire. Besides processing on a computer is significantly more powerful than the internal image processing done in any camera so thats another plus to raw. Canon 5D mark iii RAW.

Voigtlander 40mm f2 w/ SLR Magic Anamorphot + Tiffen Pearlescent. digilogcolor.com “Aesir” LUT was used for the CC

The ISF has stated that since 1080p resolution is the least perceivable determining factor of image quality. Dynamic range,color saturation and accuracy are at the top of their list. 4K is pretty overrated

Oops I don’t think I said that correctly. Im thinking in comparison to Magic Lantern Raw. All stock canon’s are ridiculously soft but Canon raw as you know is a whole other animal. I wouldn’t know for sure without side by side testing but that doesn’t come close to Canon 5d raw at 1080, its good but there’s better

I would kill for an xc10 with an interchangeable lens. That would be a game changer. The built in lens kinda holds it back...ergonomically its excellent

I got rid of the xc10. Too problematic. I went for the mark iii because it hit a lot of bullet points for me and ML works perfectly with it. Canon really cripples their cameras on purpose and the 5D before raw proved that to me @kye

@kye what are you shooting with now bro?

@Andrew Reid the 5DS has a LOT of line skipping to get to that 2 megapixel 1080p image. Im not sure I’ve seen or heard anything good come out of that camera especially in comparison to canon’s other dslr

@Django the Canon 5D mark iii is for sure 3x3 pixel binning. I recall reading an article from a canon engineer saying that they didn’t aim to increase the megapixels over the Canon 5D mark ii because with 3x3 pixel binning scales to 1080p without skipping lines. Pixel binning works by combining neighboring pixels and 22.3 with their 3x3 binning equates a 1080p 2mp image. 5760 x 3840 divided by 3x3 = 1920 x 1280 3:2 aspect ratio. The 200 pixels get cropped out for 1920 x 1080 video What seems to be happening with Canon RAW video in magic lantern is bypassing a lot of the elements that equate the Canon soft resolution.

They chose 22.3 because it allows them to do 3x3 pixel binning without moire artifacts or a noticeable degradation of quality. Pixel binning also has the added effect of making pixels look brighter by using neighboring pixels from the 22.3 sensor when output to 1080p. It cuts down on processing power required versus 1:1 full sensor readout and works really well for the higher end Canon's that don't use line skipping for their 1080p output I think its the codec and in camera processing making the image so soft. ML Raw is such a huge jump in quality it has to be the codec & image processing