Homerus
-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Homerus got a reaction from richg101 in Kendy Ty and the T2i - one guy doing amazing things with a 5 year old DSLR
I shot my short film on the 550D. Some shots still look quite amazing:
-
Homerus reacted to johnnymossville in First sample video from the new KineMINI 4K - image quality looks seriously impressive
Camera operator looks like he just woke up at the waffle house sleeping off a Vegas Bender.
-
Homerus reacted to Oliver Daniel in First sample video from the new KineMINI 4K - image quality looks seriously impressive
The star of the show at NAB is not the A7s, the AJA, the Blackmagic Ursa, Studio...
....it's the Kinefinity Cameras, and they deserve more press than they are getting. Much more.
-
Homerus got a reaction from estarkey7 in Blackmagic URSA - a $6k 4K professional cinema camera with interchangeable sensor
This camera reminds me of them Alienware laptops... or an Aventador
-
Homerus reacted to jpfilmz in Panasonic GH4 Production Diary - Day 4 - Low light
I noticed this aswell. I still think the 5D raw is better all around in low light BUT the price point for the GH4 + Speedbooster is a tremendous combination that is impossible to ignore.
-
Homerus reacted to Andrew Reid in Panasonic GH4 Production Diary - Day 4 - Low light
5D Mark III is in raw... that is the optimal setting :)
-
Homerus got a reaction from Cole Alcock in Beautiful 4K Blackmagic Production Camera footage from James Miller
I'm not that awe struck either, but I'm not judging that fast. That being said, I've never found many video's made with the BMCC 2.5k or BMPCC that I liked. 5D is a different story. This is, I think, the main difference:
BMCC: Made to look like film
5D RAW: 25 frames of actual photographs (which is what the 5D was build for)
It's just personal preference
-
Homerus got a reaction from JHines in Beautiful 4K Blackmagic Production Camera footage from James Miller
I'm not that awe struck either, but I'm not judging that fast. That being said, I've never found many video's made with the BMCC 2.5k or BMPCC that I liked. 5D is a different story. This is, I think, the main difference:
BMCC: Made to look like film
5D RAW: 25 frames of actual photographs (which is what the 5D was build for)
It's just personal preference
-
Homerus got a reaction from tosvus in Panasonic GH4 in a professional setting - FAQ
To be honest, I'm having a pretty difficult time interpreting your metaphor... But if I understand correctly, you're saying 1080p is a bit on the way out? Otherwise you may need to provide me with a new metaphor :P
I'm worried that the 4K footage will show compression artefacts, even if it's shot at 100mbps.
-
Homerus reacted to Andrew Reid in Panasonic GH4 in a professional setting - FAQ
OK imagine it as a highway...
5D raw opens up the highway to 6 lanes but there's not really that much traffic, most people stay at home. That's 1080p.
GH4 also opens up the highway to 6 lanes but the lanes are busier. Loads of bastards on the road, some of them annoying and noisy. But wow it's a nice busy road :)
-
Homerus reacted to tosvus in Panasonic GH4 in a professional setting - FAQ
I haven't tried the GH4 yet, but two points you may take into consideration;
1. I think you can get a speedbooster for your Contax Zeiss lenses. If you do, it makes the crop factor much closer, and the added light sensitivity will likely make up for most of the advantage a larger sensor would have with the same lenses.
2. By downsizing 4K signal to 1080p in post, theoretically it should boost the picture to something like 10bit 422 or better and I would expect it would hold up very well in grading.