Jump to content

iamoui

Members
  • Content Count

    188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by iamoui


  1. 3 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

    I don't think he's guilty of overthinking it. He thinks Ken Rockwell's reviews are extremely in-depth :)

     

     

    Hey guys, just trying to help. Thanks, Andrew, for going through my post history in a strange attempt to shame me or call me stupid or something. I think that says more about you than it does about me.

    Regardless of whether or not you like Ken or his reviews, are they not in-depth?


  2. Has anyone seen Ken Rockwell's RP review? https://kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/rp.htm

    Interesting to note:

    • 4k has ALL-I (480 Mbps) or IPB (120 Mbps). IPB only for 1080p.
    • Canon Log internal??
    • Uncompressed 4K UHD 4:2:2 10- or 8-bit HDMI output with Canon Log. Neutral (Rec. 709 or Rec. 2020) and Cinema EOS Original (Rec. 709) color matrices.

    Am I reading this correctly? His reviews are extremely in-depth I can't imagine these are oversights.


  3. 37 minutes ago, Brian Williams said:

    You have a point, but in fairness, there has been a strange amount of NX1 comparisons on this particular thread for some reason, and most of them have been a little righteous. Not sure why the NX1, of all cameras, keeps being compared to this one. Is it the h265?

    Maybe because those that have bought and used the NX1 haven’t been able to find another aps-c sized camera that compares to the colors, usability, autofocus, ergonomics, specs, experience, etc. since Samsung abandoned their camera division. The XT-3 would be, to those people, the camera that comes close to/bests the NX1 and they would like to discuss it in this thread. 


  4. 11 minutes ago, DBounce said:

    Not sure why everyone with an NX1 feels the need to chime in about how great it is compared to this camera.  I had the NX1 and sold it... haven't looked back... haven't missed it. All my cameras since have been upgrades over the NX1. While it was good for its day, times have moved on. It's not a standard by which all else must be judged,  and frankly never was. 

    Yeah, how dare people discuss their personal experiences with cameras and compare them. What do they think this is a camera forum or something??


  5. 45 minutes ago, jonpais said:

    This is not about worrying what others think - it’s about some know-it-all joining the lens thread with the sole purpose of trashing the model in my video.

    @jonpais He complimented you ("Great images as always") then made an observation about the model not looking natural, which she doesn't. Why are you taking it so personally?


  6. What lynch mob are you guys referring to? I saw people ask for evidence of a claim, which is reasonable, I saw one person act like a jerk, and I saw a few people do some detective work to pretty much show the claims made were most likely false. Now this “kid” is running away because of the way he was supposedly treated?

    4 hours ago, Matthew Hartman said:

    He gave a date. You're just impatient. End of story. 

    How can I be impatient if I’m not waiting for anything? I’m simply making an observation. I do, however, enjoy watching all the virtue signaling of “guys he’s just a kid take it easy on him, goooosh”. He’s got a long road in front of him if he can’t handle a few people on the internet being rude. That is, if he is even a “kid.”  It’s not rude to be skeptical on the internet when pretty much everyone is anonymous. 

    I also enjoyed your generalization of New Yorkers. Very tolerant and liberal of you. The story never ends. 


  7. 5 hours ago, wind1414 said:

    Hi, could somebody tell me the best converter for f.e. H265 to Prores, highest quality, Mac version. Tried Edit Ready and it is fine BUT checking the converted file it seems that it is loosing a biz Highlight and Shadow detail ?? 

    Thanks 

    I've always used Rocky Mountain Movie Converter to convert my NX1 h.265 files to ProRes.

    Here is an informative thread on Edit Ready: 

    Other people reported losing highlight/shadow detail. I think it has something to do with 16-235 vs 0-255. I haven't checked that thread in a while but I think I remember Andrew recommending reducing the contrast slider or something to bring the detail back.

    Good luck!

    Mick

     


  8. On 9/27/2017 at 9:19 AM, Kisaha said:

    @iamoui ..and those are some of the best news regarding equality of sexes I heard in 2017!

    I read this the other day, victims have names, faces, lives, are not just numbers

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/raped-never-spoke-one-day-work/

    Maybe in about 200 years or so KSA will stop flogging women for leaving the house without a male guardian or jailing bloggers or start letting women make their own decisions without a males approval or stop the mandatory covering of the head and body when women leave the house. 

    Maybe. 


  9. 15 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

    Its just that statistically she has been discriminated against several times through out her career. Be it salary, missed opportunities, asked to get coffee, etc.

    Care to share these statistics? You're making pretty large, broad, and definite claims about a woman's life that you don't even know. Has every woman that has ever lived faced discrimination? What about men? Do they not face discrimination, too?

    4 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

    This sort of talk is simply not true. Not even the part about profit since its proven that a diverse company are more efficient and makes more profit than one that's not.
    They hire men because they are men.

    On another note,
    Why people still deny reality and go of into fantasy land I will never understand. It cant be because of an orange president, it must be some sort of gender fanboy mechanism.

     

    You seem very sure of yourself that there is "institutional" sexism or discrimination going on. Again, do you have any evidence? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying sexism and discrimination don't exist. I just think blanketing the whole thing as institutional solves nothing and helps no one. If there are certain, specific instances of discrimination let's fight them because it is wrong. 

    I don't think companies as a whole are purposely discriminating against women. If they were, women would not be in high positions, which they are.

    It sounds to me like you're the one in fantasy land. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Not sure what Trump has to do with anything we're discussing here. Seems like low-hanging fruit. Also, not sure what "gender fanboy mechanism" is. I think the arguments you're receiving are logic and reason based, instead of emotional and virtue signaling. 

×
×
  • Create New...