Emanuel

Lovely camera hard to beat if ever : ) Fujifilm (maker) really rules. PS -- Funny note: test to watch it @480p (or even @360p) and compare with other camera samples at same resolution... :X Cinematic outcome is an ultimate combo this brand shows to know.

I just don't see ergonomics as a major technical one. It depends on the user. But from user to user, other technical aspects play a much more relevant role, not even close I'd say.

I am not against ergonomics in general at all! (don't wanna be a fool... LOL : ) I am just criticizing the weight some people give to the topic here or in any other cameras forum. There are much other aspects to consider when we choose a camera IMHO. Aside the fact, this issue can also stand in a subjective approach, as Mattias pointed out. It hasn't impacted the task to not buy a camera IMO. I differently agree that buying/using a camera for form factor is a whole other matter, though. Two different perspectives. C100/300 are indeed a fine example. Samsung owners praise their devices as we all know here, too. Nothing against on their/your/our likings on the subject matter.

Our job?? It depends on the job you have in the filmmaking business, at least. Come from shooting on 35mm film, pointedly before digital, and you'll never complain against the ergonomics of any of these little cameras. To me, all this talk is nonsense. Sorry me, but seems so odd all this babble on ergonomics... Without mention the whole set of accessories to customize (y)our camera as you wish. Maybe a cup of "our favorite chocolate" might come in-camera but such evil manufacturers have decided to put it outside there... ;-)

This ergonomics argument as a 'must mantra' is pure BS, IMHO. Seems to my eyes the same excuse people are used to pop up when a new camera is launched for explaining their filmmaking inertia : ) Who is unable to set up and give to the world any piece of work with and from a G7 or a6300, as for instance, is unable to shoot with any other capture device. It won't matter 4:2:2 whatever the number of bits you have, nor form factor, for sure. No other acquisition tool will save the unfortunate shooter. Neither RED or Alexa. E :-)

a6500.

Many "scientists" in disguise :-D We are all artists after all, isn't it? Power on them, democratization follows. 10-bit 4:2:2 on budget... Comes to my mind when ML hack popped up.

Isn't grading a color science? ; ) Your posts coupled to a few *cough cough* likes (what a bitch they are : D) are an exponential growth. Here is why we're unlikely able to see a pre-production review over here... LOL

Priceless post : ) One of the reasons I am here. Good humor, man, too!

Eduardo, parece que você está no radar da Kinefinity... / seems you are going towards to Terra 5K... pretty promising BTW (Emanuel :-)

Pre-order placed for two units with them (CVP). You have two possible routes: global shutter or start to deal and take profit of that. Shooting style will say thank you ; ) OK, joke aside, what the hell of shooting are you doing in order to take such minimal rolling shutter so intrusive? : ) Funny stuff... I still remember when people were used to praise the cinematic properties of CMOS sensors against the old CCD technology tagged as videoish : P Saudações lusófonas, E :-)

So, not 2:1 6000x3000?

GH5 is much better than the predecessor...

Griffin Hammond's "HAND-CUT" is 8-bit 4:2:0. Is it bad...? ;-)

+1

Funny reply. Seriously : ) What's wrong there...? Maybe the snow(-like/look)?! : D Nice grading too, jonpais, season aside, I concur they should have announced this camera six months ago, even though, in the same northern hemisphere :-) Copacabana, Rio, Yesterday morning...

Well, there's no interesting piece of gear without someone behind, oh my, the point beyond is the quality of someone behind ; ) I stand, PRO means three letters and a romantic idea as far as this topic concerns. A few of PRO people don't even share their secrets at all.

There is useful know-how to learn from professionals and useless yadda yadda too... Such as same technique any curious shooter will find based on a few practice and self D2L ( desire to learn : ) The PRO tag means nothing at least to me. The amateur, on the other hand, is variably more prone to give something to the world, no less often much more than people are used to associate to the professional missing link. An interesting piece of gear can always bring something in the right hands, for sure.

It depends on both of the parts to equate...

Horses for courses. But, I love the mirrorless camera concept. Nothing related to PRO label misconceptions. That said, GH series are pro cameras from consumer segment.

Very interesting combo(s):

You can't be less than just 100% right ; ) One of my instructors at film school was used to say the same since my early days at film school 2 decades ago... Like button on twice mode :-)

Indeed. It is roughly an equivalent 24-120mm... Remember my Canon 24-105mm used as FF is only f/4 but throughout the whole range, though.