Emanuel

OK, thanks. And?

*cough cough* PS: Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 (non-speedboosted Metabones adapter, though)

https://***URL not allowed***/video-devices-pix-e5-review/ https://***URL not allowed***/video-devices-pix-e5-vs-atomos-shogun/

But, 15x did the trick, right? ;-)

http://leicarumors.com/2013/03/22/leica-camera-ag-opens-new-plant-in-portugal.aspx/ about 20kms away from where I was born... :-)

24-105mm is a very interesting FF lens indeed. Pity, by design, doesn't fit quite well the Letus' anamorphic adapter.

Tools... Sorry mates, not Warp sample this time! : D

I don't feel much sorrow for focus pullers or film stock or whatever trace of technology already outdated. My beef is the way people in general tend to neglect essential aspects of craft for the ultimate gimmick to rule a geeky POV over our heads. Moving image is beyond technology. Pity YouTube generations have no clue at all, lost in translation.

Aside the fact 4K gives better 1080p, the remainder is very true. I meant the hype, not the stabilization tools. And ain't we already? OK, the frame rate has changed since then... LOL ;-) No, it is very hyped, actually. People believe moving camera makes the film. People forget everything that can make "a film" to begin with ...framing. My dear Ebrahim, I am in this métier for more than 20-25 years and I proud myself to have suffered for entering in a very tough film school and not necessarily in my first attempt to arrive there. People now tend to think in order to have a good shot, we only need some Oly camera! : D They've even forgotten what a tripod does mean... :-(

Anyways, this stabilization hype is completely overrated. We have motion pictures since 1895 over the big screen, but maybe those guys were merely too naive then ;-)

It depends if you trigger from camera (yes) or only in the external recording (no).

Enough is a cruel word when your still work goes larger format...

You're also forgetting something most important if not from ages, at least since when a camera left the shoulders of the operator (considering a camera had left a tripod for first time some time earlier): steady hands!

Right. But, no need! Go on post... ;-)

Good Joke, Ebrahim! ;-)

In fact title should have been written in the reversal order... ; )

This is not usual darwinfish anamorphic stuff * * but something particularly addressed to Andrew who had originally posted on Vimeo some clip based on infamous settings -> severe aliasing, of course... : ) here you have guys:

http://www.sonyalphashooter.com/a7rii-first-impressions/ http://eriknaso.com/2015/08/25/first-day-with-the-sony-a7rii-shooting-internal-4k-ibis-slog2-test/

https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=V9CYFwUDLbM

Funny, if they would crap their product... and some group of geeks would develop some crazy hack to lift their limits, then would be a terrific steal...? : D C'mon, where do you find the best tech in the smallest 8K/4K package (yes, price included) ??! Let's get a fair perspective on here, give a break to your (d)efective nonsense : ) With or without they had somehow clippled their hot stove in form of mirrorless camera only for SELLING their higher price range, they've offered the best they can in a REALLY portable capture device -- add external recording and stop whining about your VIRTUAL sex life with a girl you're not even thinking to date, go figure to live with! : D (BTW, I didn't buy it yet, I had just placed a pre-order so to comply now, this camera will stand by me and letting run 'n gun no matters how many quirks we're still reading in these pages... ...only because you'd actually and merely love to pay it for a perfect angel just like heaven!) | | | | | V

I don't think it is confusing, Andrew is right on his comment but you too when you say the result is variable depending on the circumstances. As everything in life. Camera requires an operator. ;-)

First off... Actually, someone else wrote in these boards anything I can quote now: something like the technology in this field has reached a point where any improvement is incremental. I fully agree. So? Lowlight performance and 4K in-camera we've already had, either on a7S or GH4/NX1 only to mention the best cases IMO. The point is to have both in the same capture device. Add that IBIS hand, despite DIS, OIS or any external accessory, with no mention of post much better than the infamous jittering... : D + 42MP for large prints photography and you'll have the whole package spread in pieces with the remaining offer out there. Is it worthy of 3x times as you say? It depends on what you'll be doing with the camera for sure.

Right, as already said before. And the work of the shooter is to beware of all flaws of his/her tool. That's the whole point to argue here. Hence my request on samples, but fair examples. Not opinion making based on what? Our own needs don't serve the needs of the other one. Moreover, lots of criticism I've ever seen is based on subjective and personal decisions to make or not make that investment. Without mention any other reason to not subscribe this or that business offer. Because all in life is business. Even private posting in public boards can hide or second any sort of POV, not shared with the interest or pocket of other potential buyer/user. Let's get some objectivity over here. So, still waiting for samples from real world. Evidence. Not mere words easily typed on web. On workarounds, their evaluation are part of our decision and shooter's work when decides to go ahead. Therefore, my plead on showing me the skeleton. Not valid to hide it in the cabinet!