Emanuel

http://www.phonearena.com/news/The-iPhone-6s-vs-Nikon-D750-4K-video-beating-the-pants-off-a-DSLR_id74514 In any case, apples to oranges... ;-)

another interesting review:

So, color science à la Fuji, you say? ;-)

Indeed. Even though, Panasonic has managed all this in a different way.

By Philip Bloom:

True. 4K is a golden standard for motion picture BTW. Big screen for theatrical release included. IMAX aside, perhaps. Actually, there is more beyond sharpness. Mavic outcome is a fine example of that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ofey0eqC74g&lc=z12ew11pnvnvdjdfh232g1si1rb3ulh1m

Even though, I may follow Andrew on his X-T2 bet, well, some perspective(s) also will ;-) https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&normalization=full&widget=105&x=-0.07116278920634347&y=0.7982730037049333 https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&normalization=full&widget=105&x=-0.07116278920634347&y=0.7982730037049333 On the other hand... https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=panasonic_dmcgx85&attr72_0=4k&attr72_1=4k&normalization=full&widget=426&x=0.4260463692707934&y=-0.13237727523441808 https://***URL removed***/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr29_0=sony_a6300&attr29_1=fujifilm_xt2&attr72_0=4k&attr72_1=4k&normalization=full&widget=426&x=0.4260463692707934&y=-0.13237727523441808

Impressive...

http://images.apple.com/final-cut-pro/docs/Apple_ProRes_White_Paper.pdf (Pages 21-22)

Interesting information. My bad, I thought they would be able to record video on SD cards at least (SSD on board on Inspire 2). Therefore, they could be a curious GH5 competitor with 4/3" format, 4K/60p, still a chance for V90 SDXC route (= 720Mbps; ProRes begins at 500Mbps, without mention V60 cards for ProRes LT or 1080HQ at 220Mbps). Pity, that said, they're losing a fine chance to be a competitive camera company.

Funny to say once we're unable to yet order the version 1 now but actually, Mavic Pro 2 will :-)

Phantom 4 Pro is a bomb :-) http://www.dji.com/phantom-4-pro http://store.dji.com/product/phantom-4-pro

Impressive stuff. DJI is earning a special and unique place in the industry. Very disruptive products. Reminds me RED* but at DSLR prices. I am sold. * without mention, there's no RED drone or RED Osmo...

http://store.dji.com/product/inspire-2-ssd-120#/?_k=z7zo20 http://store.dji.com/product/inspire-2-ssd-480#/?_k=8kr0hy http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/15/13627800/dji-inspire-2-drone-two-cameras-professional-ssd

Indeed. Well, it seems 1600 will compete with the GH5... http://store.dji.com/product/zenmuse-x5s-exclude-lens#/?_k=ydfi1i

Still from Bali series... and etc... a low light sample: 2.7K acquisition mixed with iPhone 7 Plus + FilmicPro app coupled to a slider for non-aerial shots: and another shootout:

D-Cinelike @ 800 ISO: another low light sample, but response of same kind... crushed blacks, oh yeah, but virtually noiseless and detail where there's light to expose: more interesting stuff on Mavic potentialities: Not available embedded but it is worthy to watch it on vimeo... take a look:

Well, unless we can call accidental to the tap to focus feature... This feature is unique, not present in any one of the Mavic competitors. Without mention a lens aperture almost one stop faster comparing with the previous offer : ) As written earlier, so far, the jury is still out if it is a QC issue, a design flaw or a feature from its tap to focus design. I'd even dare to bet beyond (and a way more) than faulty units... The tap to focus design + a shitty codec for half-focused areas when the settings on sharpness are dialed down. :-)

Really? I wouldn't be so sure of that... : P Even though the QC explanation route or because there's also a chance for a lens design flaw as much as reported with the Lumia 1020 model; as already written earlier in a previous post of mine along this thread BTW : ) I bet it's much related to the focus system present on Mavic; it's all about tap to focus design, I believe. Remember it's the first time you have it present alongside a drone. I believe that's why you're able to get it 'sharp edge to edge' throughout some other footage samples, as well. But, as you wish, that said, I don't see a single reason why people are used to praise any-lovely-distortion when we simply mention the magic words 'anamorphic glass', despite to easily irritate themselves when a similar feature pops up in a Chinese piece of nouvelle technology designed and made somewhere in the other side of Pacific ; ) Shouldn't it be called cinematic in the same way? ;-)

Link fixed now: Another one: