Sorry guys, I really don't get you. Where are all these problems on low light?
I'm not an influencer nor an ambassador so I can only watch other people's GH6 reviews but I shot with Lumix camera underwater in though conditions since GH1.
Among the countless GH6 reviews I've been watching, this has real world examples and compares GH6 directly with Sony A7SIII. So ATM it's the only review I found which shows different camera clips side by side.
BTW this guy tests and uses a bunch of gear but basically he is a Sony A7 guys.
Well, by his own admission, GH6 images are way better under most conditions. While images sucks for both cameras at 6400 already, GH6 surrenders to A7SIII at ISO 12800.
Repeat with me: I - S - O 1 - 2 - 8 - 0 - 0
my question is: who shoot at ISO 12800?
Hereafter some bookmarks for GH6 Vs A7SIII:
9:05 onwards GH6 resolution is better.
15:20 onwards ISO test. GH6 wins hands down up to ISO 6400.
27:00 onwards DR test. Again GH6 is better.
Other facts:
AF sucks but it's usable under some conditions.
IBIS is the best out there.
probably the best cheap anamorphic camera of all time.
Tons of terrific ergonomic features for video users (as all the other GH camera)
So when I read so many rants about it, what I'm missing?