eatstoomuchjam

I'm not justifying anything. i'm enjoying the benefits of having a single system that can do everything I want (except most games). I don't see any advantage in having a separate system that I also need to keep up-to-date with my editor, plugins, etc. "Better performance" only matters if the secondary machine doesn't already do everything as well as you need/want. You like having both? That's great. I hope you enjoy it. I like having one system that I can easily take with me when I go abroad or go camping for months at a time.

It's probably not a question of "processing" (and even if it were, it'd be a hard one to overcome and very expensive for a niche camera) https://www.sony-semicon.com/files/62/pdf/p-13_IMX461ALR_AQR_Flyer.pdf Unless I'm mistaken, GFX 100 and II are both based on IMX461 AQR. The maximum readout speed in full resolution is 10 fps with 12-bit color. Lines up nicely with the GFX 100 II dropping to 12-bit mode when shooting at 8fps. If there's an 8-bit readout mode, maybe they could get close to (or even reach) 12k readout from the sensor at 24fps, but what's the market? People who want enormous files, but shitty dynamic range? The GFX 100 II is almost certainly doing as much as it can with a sensor that is now like 4-5 years old (most of their wording around "new sensor" was really in "new circuitry to read from the sensor as fast as possible"). My guess is that we won't see a dedicated "cinema" GFX until Sony release a newer medium format sensor which is better optimized for video. I'd love to be wrong, but for now, I don't mind having one of the best stills cameras in the world which also features some really nice video modes.

The RS 1" is so good. If I knew they'd stop making the 1" modules, I'd have bought a couple more. (Also, I have one modded by Back-Bone with a passive M43 mount and while I've not shoot anything useful with it, it's one of the most fun cameras that I own - 5.7k with a 1" sensor with a telephoto lens? That's crazy fun - just wish there were a better option for focusing - either an external screen or letting me hardwire my iPhone to the USB port (maybe the RS supports iPhone? Mine still has the original R brain))

Any modern Mac (and I assume most decent gaming/creator PC's) should be able to drive 3 4K monitors. Mine aren't 4K, but I spend all day working from my M2 Max laptop connected to the 3 monitors in my home office. When work ends, I unplug it from the two docking stations (two because I also run 10gE) and use it with the 14" internal screen. The absolute performance of a desktop would, of course, be better (which is why I have a Windows gaming PC hooked up in the next room), but at some point, performance is "enough" for what one is trying to do.

Keep in mind that even a number of cameras still do some processing even on so-called "raw" formats. If they didn't, any two cameras using the same sensor would look exactly the same, but they don't. There's a reason that raw looks different from multiple manufacturers despite that each one is using Sony sensors (for those who do - Sony, Fuji, Z Cam, Panasonic (I think?), and Black Magic (also I think?)). Unrelated to that... As far as whether raw is worth it, it depends on a combination of how much work you want to do with it and how flexible you want the footage to be. For what you're doing, if you have lots of time to set up and prefer a slower pace of shooting, raw is probably not too important. You have plenty of time to make sure to "get it right" in camera. On the other hand, if storage space isn't a concern, there's very little reason _not_ to shoot raw.

I own the original GFX 100 and a GFX 100 II. I don't own a Z8 or a Z9, but I feel confident in saying that if video is your main use, you're better off with the Nikon. The II is a huge upgrade over the original GFX 100 for video, and the image is really gorgeous, but even after almost 2 months, I still get annoyed trying to remember how much any given mode crops and which ones have decent vs which have severe RS, etc. But yeah, for stills, I love it - and I love that it fits easily into a camera bag (and is pretty light) unlike my original 100. 😃

I'm not sure if they'll restock it, but Canon has refurb R5's for $2200 until November 30. It's a hell of a deal. https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/p/refurbished-eos-r5-body?cjdata=MXxOfDB8WXww&cjevent=e91a0e218d5011ee81860f990a82b82c&utm_source=Sovrn+Inc&utm_campaign=13505864

It's a weird decision - that was evergreen content that cost them nothing to leave up and, assuming they're in the YPP, probably made them a small (but non-zero) amount of money yearly.

There are lots of caveats and asterisks there. In Mac terms, the most powerful mini is available with M2 Pro. It comes with a maximum of 32GB of memory. Depending on needs (10gE for a NAS, the more powerful M2 Pro processor?), by the time you upgrade it, it will cost about as much as an M1 Ultra with similar specs and potentially a bit better performance. If not looking at a Mac, as Jedi Master said, there's a lot more bang for a buck in a desktop PC. For about as much as you'd pay for an upgraded mini ($2100-2400), you can get a 16-core AMD processor, 64GB of RAM, a couple of blazing fast NVMe 2TB drives, and a 3080ti or 4070ti (maybe even a 4080?) which has a lot more raw power than the Mac. Though it'll also be big and a bit noisier. This sort of choice may also depend on the price of power in your area, as it's like $0.11 per kwh in Oregon and $0.47 per kwh in Britain right now. At almost 50 cents per kwh, you might want the computer which draws less than 200w when fully loaded (and is totally able to do everything you need) and not the one which draws 700-1000w.

Equivalent in Windows-land? It doesn't really exist. 12th/13th generation Intel has much better performance per watt than 11th generation, but the built-in GPU isn't anywhere near the performance of M1 so you'd need something with a dedicated GPU which won't be low power. If I'm guessing I'd say that an i7-12700 or i7-13700 with the laptop version of an RTX 4060 should be about similar to the performance of an M1 Max while plugged into the wall, but with the caveat that the Windows laptop will pull more power and be noisier (fans to remove the heat from using so much power). However, the second you unplug the laptop from the wall, the performance and battery life of the Windows system will be substantially worse than the M1 Max. You can find Windows laptops with more raw power than even the highest-end M3 Max - and desktops even more so, but the cost is that the power usage will be a lot higher. I'm too lazy to go look now, but I'd bet that an RTX 4090 all by itself uses more power at full load than an entire M3 Max laptop, including the screen. 😃

Even if I knew the difference in price between M2 and M3, I wouldn't be able to say whether it's worth the difference in price. I could say, though, that I have the lower-end M2 Max in my 14" MBP and in Resolve, it's able to handle every type of footage that I bring in to edit, though my color grading is relatively straightforward/simplistic. If you're doing more complex stuff, YMMV. I'll also qualify "every type of footage" with the caveat that 8K raw from the EOS R5 basically maxes it out (a bit more or less depending on the decode options chosen). The fancier M2 Max with a better GPU would do a little bit better with the R5 footage. So it's likely that either the M2 Max or M3 Max would be enough for most things you'd wanna do. I'd upgrade the RAM since it can't be upgraded later. I went with 64GB. That seems to be working out well for me. I expect that it will continue to work well for me for the next few years.

If it pushes you over the edge for hitting the buy button on the C300, lensrentals.com has a pretty sweet BF sale - use code KPRBF2023 for 15% off any used gear. They have a C300 III for $6,240 in "good" condition ($5,340 after code) - which means it probably won't be the prettiest camera on the block, but probably works fine (and they have some sort of return window if it craps out in the first X days). For the C70 I planned to trade for, MPB didn't get me a final quote back yet and don't seem to be running any BF deals - so I grabbed a C70 in similar condition from 'em along with the 0.71 focal reducer - just about $4k for both ($3900 + tax). I don't think MPB do any special extra value for trade-in so I'll just have 'em pay me if that's the case.

I've had a ZV-1 since it was released (and I had a few of the RX100's before it - including the V which is basically the same camera as the ZV-1, but without the flippy screen). IMO it's still by far one of the best vlogging cameras ever made, especially with the remote control handgrip that expands into a mini-tripod. Built-in ND, 3.5mm audio jack, good autofocus, flippy screen, 1" sensor, and a not-too-terrible codec. Weaknesses are skin tones straight out of camera and at its widest, the lens is about equivalent to a 24mm in ff terms which is a little tighter than a lot of vloggers prefer (if only it could zoom out to 20mm). If your use case isn't vlogging, as I mentioned, it's basically the same camera as the RX 100 V which merely has a tilty screen (and the cutest lil' pop-up EVF). I'm sure I'm forgetting some other small differences (the V might be a little thinner because of the lack of flip-out screen), but unless you're trying to record yourself at arm's length, I'd get whichever is cheaper.

Fair criticisms, generally. Keep in mind that focus-by-wire is not always terrible - the Fuji GF series has an option to set lenses to linear mode and with that, the focus throw is almost annoyingly long. Also, "most have focus-by-wire" is only somewhat true. A majority of Canon's EF lenses are not fbw and I think that a lot of F mount autofocus lenses are also not fbw... and both vendors make plenty of nice metal lenses that are very robust. Plenty of inexpensive cine lenses are also flimsy plastic. But of course it's true that almost all of them have electronic aperture and that (almost) none of the lenses have 0.8 gears - and that most of the ways to add gears are cruddy. The best I've found are some (hard rubber?) slip-on rings that are at least better than the janky adjustable ones that leave a weird pigtail on the lens, but they generate their own problems. Also, as far as focus breathing, there are also many so-called cine lenses that have a lot of it - so if you're extremely sensitive to it, caveat emptor!

The C500 has interchangeable mounts which means that I can use almost any non-electronic lens, including vintage ones, if I'm willing to put in the work. Before Z Cam released their M mount and M43 mounts for the flagship cameras, I measured the mount and built a template to 3d print it. Then I figured out the right thickness for infinity focus and glued the existing mount adapters. It worked great. Printed with PCCF, they'll also take a beating (though I don't know that I'd trust them with the full weight of the camera or heavy lenses). Anyway, since the mounts are user-swappable on the C500 II, that means creation of an M mount adapter for it should be fairly trivial. I love my Leicas and sadly, M mount is too short to make a focal reducer for APS-C setups. Also, the C500 has an optional viewfinder (though that's even more money on top of the still-much-higher cost). I'll probably stick with the C70 for the still-wider dynamic range, though that may also depend on whether the used shop I'm using for trade-in finishes the evaluation today and then decides to go big with a BF sale. 🙂

I'm attacking you over nothing. I responded to a different person completely who said that there was no difference in most of the cameras being discussed (even outside the context of landscape) with two examples of differences (RS and DR). You went after RS as not applicable to the OP's concern and I responded that RS was not brought up in response to the OP. Then you brought it up again and said it wasn't relevant to the OP and I responded again saying that it wasn't brought for the OP, but to the third party who claimed that there was no difference in the image between a P4K and a C70, among other things. Anyway. There are obviously small differences in the look of a 35 and 50 for landscapes, particularly in framing things that are close-up, but on full frame, a kit looking something like 20/24/50/(85-100)/200 will be plenty for most things - with optional wider (14-16mm) and longer (400mm). Otherwise, in the context of many landscape shots, no. The difference in a 35/40 and a 40/50 (and to some extent, a 35 and a 50) are small and easily compensated by moving forward and back a few feet. Otherwise, if one wants the very specific control of focal length/perspective, a zoom lens is the most appropriate choice, as a 31 might give more of the desired result than a 34. All of the love for the C500 has me considering it now instead of the C70 for my trade-in. Limited to EF mount is a minor bummer, but I would probably just put the 0.71x focal reducer semi-permanently on the C70 anyway...

FWIW, for landscape especially, I would not buy the 10 lens kit. There's barely a reason at all to own 35, 40, and 50 (unless you want similar focal lengths for a multi-camera shoot and don't want to duplicate). Between 35 and 50, you can take about 1 small step forward and back. Between 35 and 40, you can move the tripod a few inches. 😉 Those zooms seem pretty alright - with only about 2x each, assuming that DZO make a quality product, the quality should be really close to a prime. Another option if putting out $7-10k for lenses would be the Fujinon MK series - but with the caveat that they're S35-only. They're really gorgeous, though, and whenever I see one used for a decent price, it takes incredible willpower not to mash the buy button (repeat to self, "I don't have many S35 cameras, I don't have...")

Already addressed in my previous comment. Stop ignoring the part where I said that wasn't referring specifically to the OP's needs. Where did I say I was powering anything by v mount? Also, keep in mind that powering the camera + monitor from the same battery can risk blowing out HDMI ports on a number of cameras due to ground loop issues. Caution is required. I manually focus almost everything and then let the robot handle the stuff where it's infeasible. Director wants a tracking shot with me running in front of the talent? Can't do it. Director wants a close-up with shallow DOF and the actor wants to be able to move like a human? Hope people are into a look where the focus is always about 100-150ms behind the talent moving around. Multi-camera shoot with only one operator? I wish I could simultaneously pull focus on two different cameras with left and right hands, but... nope. ... and Leica lenses ... and Fuji lenses ... and Sony/Minolta lenses ... and Pentax lenses ... and Panasonic/Olympus lenses ... and Mamiya lenses ... and Hasselblad lenses ... and Cambo lenses ... and Konica lenses ... and Kodak Exacta mount lenses ... and Contax/Zeiss lenses (if I remember right) How many other manufacturers, other than when making lenses for Nikon cameras, follow the Nikkor focus/aperture directions? This is why I say that Nikon are backward - I'm not able to remember even a single other vendor who follow them. 😉 For you with F mount glass and me with me with EF, it doesn't matter too much which lenses anybody is making for RF mount, just so long as there's a nice adapter available. And if Canon's strategy of locking down the mount backfires, the purchase of a different adapter will allow easy movement to Panasonic, Sony, Nikon, Red, etc.

I didn't catch that the videos are only 8-bit (he mentioned it partway through). That's a real bummer. Also, the fake motion blur that was shown near the end looks bad.

I'd suggest renting/trying a Panasonic S1H or BS1H depending on the form factor that you like. I think that the S1H DR comes really close to matching the C70 (13.8 or so stops at SNR=1 vs C70's 14 or 14.1) and I think the BS1H is the same sensor. If sharpness is important to you, the C70 is not ideal as it's a fairly soft 4K. The S1H has a pretty sharp 6K. They won't do raw internally, but you can hook 'em up to a Video Assist 12G and record raw there. Basically, it's pretty much everything that you listed as need/important and weak on a number of the things you don't care about. Otherwise, some of the RED models with a VV sensor can be found used for just a bit over $10k and they'd meet pretty much all of the requirements except maybe reliability (and have better DR than the C70 or the S1H). I don't know a lot about the DZO film lenses, but if you're spending $5k for camera+recorder, as others have pointed out, you could put some of the rest into glass.

Sorry, that was off-topic for the OP. That was more addressing the comments that any consumer camera was indistinguishable from other consumer cameras. Also, the audience doesn't know or care what ms the rolling shutter has, but they tend to notice fan blades that are all flooby and/or the feeling of sickness that they get during some handheld scenes. They also notice it in cars that are all slanted, etc. Similarly, the audience doesn't know or care how many stops of DR the camera has, but they may notice blown out highlights or the fact that they can't make out anything in the shadows. On the other hand, I could only make it through about 1/3 of a full length film that another local filmmaker made before I had to stop because the production/lighting/etc was so bad, but others watched it and said that they thought it looked nice. 🤷‍♂️ Most of the third-party EVF's don't have a direct way to attach a battery so now you're also looking at a v mount adapter or similar. I know my Z Cam EVF doesn't have one and from what I remember, the Portkeys one doesn't either. Strangely, the cheap cruddy ones that are like a 2" monitor with an eyecup that attaches with magnets DO take batteries... It gets trickier if you want to be able to support usable autofocus! I can get PDAF with my EF mount lenses on Fuji cameras and Canon RF (and I think the S5 II does it too). Last I checked, most Nikon AF adapters didn't do that. Plus everything is weird and backward on Nikon lenses. Beautiful picture from a lot of 'em, though. I lust after their 100 or 105 f/1.4. Sigma makes one that fits EF mount, I think, but their lenses just rub the the wrong way. I'm not sure why.

OP is shooting nature stuff and explicitly said, I thought, that sound wasn't a major concern. They also said that they plan to pair the camera with cine lenses so presumably they are already factoring expensive lenses into the budget to pair with their expensive camera body. But in general, I'm with you on buying better lenses vs better camera. If you invest in good lenses, they will be with you through several or many cameras. It's also why I tend to suggest to people that they go with EF glass for a lot of stuff unless they really need something about a native lens for their mirrorless. "What if next time when you're buying a camera, Canon went back to being Canon and has spent 3 years releasing the same sensor and processor in 5 different bodies with almost no differences, but Sony has innovated and released some groundbreaking new camera with all of the features you want? Will you sell all of your RF lenses for a loss and buy Sony lenses? Or will you buy an adapter for $500 or less (probably a lot less) and just keep using the excellent EF lenses that you already own? And in the next round, what if it's Panasonic that has the camera that you want?"

XF-AVC on the C70 is, unless I'm mistaken, a 10-bit 4:2:2 version of H.264 in a fancy wrapper. I think there's an all-I mode so it should be alright, but it won't stop editors from giving me an unhappy look when I hand over footage. Regardless of technical merits, people really like ProRes. 🙂 For a lot of stuff, I'll probably use the lighter of the two raw formats that it offers (except for overcranking past 60fps where it's not available). It's just not good for quick turnaround (like 48 hour film project stuff). Yeah, the integrated (or small first-party add-on) EVF is really nice to have. I'm sure that Zacuto make some sort of rubber band contraption that can go on the integrated screen for like $3,000, though. Then you can pretend you have an EVF and lose all use of the touch screen. As far as the cine lens size/weight, I've used CN-E's a lot with my E2-F6 which is smaller and lighter than the C70. By the time you add a handle and screen to the body and put rails on the front for your focus motor, etc, the "small" cinema camera bodies become "not so very small" and I haven't found the size/weight of CN-E to be a problem, at least. If OP wants to use Arri Master Prime, that might be a different calculation. 😉

If you can't tell the difference in a camera with about 14 stops of dynamic range at SNR=1 and a camera with 12.1 stops of dynamic range at SNR=1 - or you can't see the difference in 28ms of rolling shutter vs 9ms of rolling shutter when the camera moves, then you probably shouldn't be dispensing camera advice to anybody, ever. It's not to say that a camera with only 11 stops of DR and 30ms rolling shutter is unable to produce a nice-looking image. I was thrilled with my 5D Mark II at the time and compared with modern cameras, it had terrible DR and RS. Especially with ML, you could shoot with that camera today and come up with something that looks better than half of what I see entered in local film contests. Similar things could be said of the GH2 or GH5. However, the question asked by the OP isn't "what low-budget camera can I buy and find ways to work around its limitations to get the results that I want?" Also, some of the nicer options suggested (including the C70 that I was just talking about) are already pretty light and remove the need to buy a decent set of ND's.

In more positive terms, speaking for myself, I just sent off a bunch of stuff (older drones, my Sigma fp and fp-l) for trade-in and I'm planning to get a C70 back. It will probably spent most of its life with the Canon-branded speed booster screwed in and with EF glass (which I have a lot of). I'm not saying it's the dream camera for the OP, but since one of the original cameras being considered was the C300 Mark III (same sensor, I think), I'll bring it up. My use case is a bit different, though - I tend to work on low-ish budget short film stuff where we frequently have fairly minimal time to shoot since paying for the location eats up 70% of the budget (if there is a budget at all). My reasoning: - Broadest dynamic range of any camera < $10k (at least where I can find good tests published online - it's possible that some of the 8K RED's are better, but cined (and similar sites) never tested them with Xyla 21) (also note that the Sony A7 IV comes close (!)) - Built-in ND filter (not vari-nd like the Canon mount adapter) - Will autofocus very well with my EF lenses when I want it to, eye detect seems reliable for close-ups of actors who don't hold still enough to stay in focus at f/2 (and tracking by hand tends to look like a mess) - On multi-camera shoots, the colors will match nicely enough with my R5 - Speed booster bolts to the camera so things won't get too wobbly with FF EF glass, even with a focus motor (like when using my Canon CN-E set or my SLR Magic APO Microprimes) - Decent RS (15ms or so) - 4K is enough for anything I do (and a lot of it gets delivered in 2K) - more is nice for cropping in post, but I can switch to the R5 for stuff where that is expected (at the loss of a lot of dynamic range 😢 ) - Shoots raw - Batteries last a long time - Inexpensive v90 SD card media (and dual-slots to mitigate risk of media failure) - mini-XLR inputs (and I'm told decent enough preamps) for shoots without a dedicated sound person Bummers: - No built in wifi director's screen on iPad (Z Cam and Komodo are both great for this) (I'm gonna try the Hollyland Mars M1 so that I won't need to stick an extra transmitter box on my monitor) - No small first-party EVF that is powered from the camera (at least none that I can find!) - 6K would be nice for reframing in post - Only recording options are raw and H.264 - would be nice to have ProRes (or H.265, though maybe it has that and I missed it) - Inexpensive v90 SD cards max out at 256GB, I think, unless that's changed recently - if so, I expect that >256GB lose the "inexpensive" qualifier - It was announced in November of 2020 so there's a nagging voice in my mind that Canon will release an updated model that fixes all of the bummers about 3 days after mine arrives