dia3olik

On 8/13/2020 at 5:01 PM, markr041 said:

But, remember, there is also crop mode. This is simply a 1:1 crop (1.5X), so no pixel binning. Still 4K. This gives you approximately the APS-C (Super35mm) look, same as the BMPCC 6K in terms of FOV.

Hey guys!

Is S35 FULLHD 60p or 120p a full readout too? with no artifacts like aliasing or moiré?

Thanks!

@aquinox I have one I'm about to list in impressive conditions with clamps and rings everything. Let me know if interested.

14 hours ago, Sage said:

From what I saw, there was only a transform for the original Pocket

Hey Sage, are you talking about the OFX plugin inside Resolve? Or another solution? I use EC with my GH5 but I'd love to use it also with my Micro (Pocket V2 sorta)

12 hours ago, BTM_Pix said:

There will be a rotary encoder (or two....) involved with the focus control so very well guessed  

he he great! did you try already? how is the focus control with canon lenses mounted on a metabones adapter? is it smooth enough? thx!

Nice! What about focus control with an external rotary encoder with a clamp to be used with 15mm rods/handles/gimbals? ?

14 minutes ago, Sage said:

That's the plan - they just refuse to sell me one

I wonder if they have addressed the red clipping issue with the update? That's my central concern

Frankly, I'd say skip it and go for a little jewel which is about to explode...

ZCAM E2...same sensor but MUCH more of a camera than the P4K can ever be...

form factor, mindset behind it, 120 fps @ 4K with full sensor readout, build quality, power consumption,

4:3 and 6:5 ANA support, ethernet, wifi, remote control, realtime streaming to mobile via USB-C...you name it...

1 hour ago, Wild Ranger said:

I used Tiffen black pro mist in the past, but more and more often im opting for using diffusion in post production.

Ah! Yeah I'd be really happy to learn more about your post workflow for diffusion, I always find it a little bit fake...

28 minutes ago, mercer said:

Did you use a speedbooster with your Takumar lenses?

Yeah, was it with SB or straight?

41 minutes ago, kye said:

As much as I love the IBIS on my GH5, I will say that recording prores internally would be lovely.

Ninja V solves this for you...and it's a great monitor too...

hey guys! any news about this? maybe someone is still in contact with Atomos about a new firmware with this fix?

Thanks!

31 minutes ago, Wild Ranger said:

No, I STILL use CineD, I shared the frames in Vlog just because is the more requested one.

so you converted these stills from CineD to Vlog?

1 minute ago, Sage said:

I would use HQ myself (which is still a touch soft).

do you mean soft VS uncompressed vid coming off the hdmi or VS the best quality option of DNX inside the Atomos?

@Sage Why 8bit? Isn't the output 10bit? would this still apply?

To get 4k 60p 10bit out of the HDMI you have to disable internal recording...that's why I'm so invested in this he he

BTW I always set the WB when it changes with my white card so no worries here, I lean towards OCD a little so this helps too ?

Hey Sage!

I love the LUTs!!!

I have the Ninja V and it even loads the full 65x versions ! ! ! !

In fact I'm considering realtime recording with LUT applied straight to your REC709 versions using the LUTs and even to the LogC variation he he

It would be a godsend to have files already in ProRes and in LogC ?

What do you think about the LUT processing inside the ATOMOS recorders? Have you tried one?

Is the internal interpolation/math for LUTs good? Is it tetrahedral?

I'm a math noob he he just asking to understand if the LUT algos inside the recorders would be of the same quality of Resolve...

I mean potentially it would be even better because occurring on an uncompressed signal and BEFORE compressing the signal to ProRes ! ! !

What do you think??

Thanks!!!!!

Yes it can import LUTs.

zeiss 85mm f1.4, wide open on full frame.

C/Y , ZF/ZE or Otus? Thanks!

Thanks for sharing Tito, nice move! ;)

Thanks for this test!

first post! ;)

Jonesy,

in my experience it's the opposite...

with anamorphics you get wider shots so in essence you almost always are using a longer focal length

so to simulate the look you have to compress the depth a little using longer lenses and moving back...

;)