dafreaking
-
Posts
293 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Articles
Everything posted by dafreaking
-
And that said that I didn't know what 'filmic' meant? Read the rest of the thread. It was more to say how that term get's people all riled up with everyone's interpretations of the word. Time to go back to lurking :(
-
On a PC. A sort of work around I have found for my use for now is using Fast Color Corrector, change the Hue angle to -9.0 and Saturation down to 95%. It looks greenish in Premiere, but on export it's closer to the colours I wanted.
-
Whoa. Easy their sailor. Where did you come up with me not knowing what 'filmic' is in relation to cameras? If you are trying to say what the perfect camera would be, then I guess you are bang on. If this is meant to tease about an upcoming camera. Kudos, you have everyone's attention.
-
Err what are you trying to say in this post Andrew?
-
So it's the export from premiere that seems to have a colour issue. If I bring back clips exported from premiere back into premiere then the color shift disappears. Really don't know what to do know.
-
Ok so it's not youtube per se. The colours in Premiere are just different to the rest of my computer. Even when played with MediaPlayer it has this pinkish tinge. Any advice?
-
Guys, a super quick question. What settings should I export a video at for optimal results with youtube? I have exported a 720p file with a target bitrate of 7.5 mbps and it has an added pinkish tinge to it when on youtube. Is there any fix for this?
-
Vimeo to automatically mute videos with 'unlicensed' soundtracks
dafreaking replied to Andrew - EOSHD's topic in Cameras
Wistia is hideously expensive just to showcase work/showreel etc. Seems good for client previews though. But, why would one use it for client previews? Vimeo, even with it's new terms, one shouldn't be in breach. -
Vimeo to automatically mute videos with 'unlicensed' soundtracks
dafreaking replied to Andrew - EOSHD's topic in Cameras
Please let us know when you find some reliable ones. Cheers! -
If you are willing to pony up for those CFast cards then fo sho!
-
Thanks Andy, but what about lenses us mere mortals can buy?
-
Guy could you recommend a few zoom lenses with long focus throws. Compatible/Adaptable to EF mounts. Preferably with faster apertures, though I don't think to many manual lenses were very fast. Out of the Modern ones I hear the Sigma 18-35 has a focus throw of almost 180 degrees. Is this true? What's the Focus throw like on Nikon D lenses (Modern lenses with aperture rings)
-
A lot of vintage lenses are/were designed to cover full frame.
-
Hey Eric, Would would be the terms of use if one was to use it in a video contest/short film competition?
-
Shooting 4K for 2K on the Panasonic GH4 plus pre-review short film
dafreaking replied to Andrew - EOSHD's topic in Cameras
Wasn't exactly what I was expecting after seeing the stuff in your production diaries, unless you have specifically gone for that look image wise. Really dug the experimental idea though. -
Shooting 4K for 2K on the Panasonic GH4 plus pre-review short film
dafreaking replied to Andrew - EOSHD's topic in Cameras
In that case it is perfect for my use. :D -
Shooting 4K for 2K on the Panasonic GH4 plus pre-review short film
dafreaking replied to Andrew - EOSHD's topic in Cameras
Quick question about the 96fps 'softness'. Is it soft like the 1080p out of the Canons with the inbuilt codec, or worse? -
Also most people don't have 4K monitors, so serving 4K is not very practical as yet.
-
A nice comparison with the GH3
-
Not at 4k. 1080p. I am not against the samera, but listing its quirks hardly seems like something to get disturbed about.
-
What about those who want to shoot higher than 30p?
-
This is a god thread to have unless it turns into bashing cameras/users. This Camera is the hottest thing since toasted sliced bread, it's good to know the quirks before we have a gazillion threads moaning about how it doesn't turn everyone into Emmanuel Lubezki.
-
But Andrew, isn't the end product what matters most? Like take for example your reviews. If they were run of the mill specs with a little more blah blah mixed in you wouldn't be different from the herd, but the storytelling approach you take in them does set you apart.
-
Shallow DOF and Close-ups are an artistic choice. Also, look at the budgets most of these "deep focus" films have.
-
A bit harsh to say that a true DOP and Director keep everything in focus. So if one does shoot shallow does that make one shit at their job, or have shit aesthetics?
