Emanuel

Are you sure? From where have you had this information? For the subject matter, I am used to be pessimist by nature...

The more I find your posts, the more I like them :-) Unfortunately or maybe not ; ) some cameras are better than other ones, though : D

I know nothing : D I just think they could and should be more competent on their own stuff... Especially related to others :-)

First off, please pay attention when someone has added some commas to his/her text : ) Secondly, my post had two parts. To answer any virtual invective : D there's also subjective objectivity, objective subjectivity, as well, many other possible configurations... : P ;-) PS: Out of curiosity, I've made some google search only to check some other texts as crossroads on topic (I am a curious and avid reader by nature : )) and I've just found the name of an old teacher of mine from University (also screenwriter and actor) preaching on it: Funny coincidence, word :-)

Dogma 95 consolidated the hype. Brecht's Verfremdungseffekt / V-effekt can mirror that. But, the fact is the suspension of disbelief requires to make the editing transparent. That is, if you're willing to sell "your reality" as real.

No idea for the reason of your post at all : ) in any way other than standing corrected DPreview?! LOL 1) The same DPreview link has already been posted in one of my posts in the previous page of this thread, where you can check the DCI 4096 wide in the specs page, actually, instead: https://***URL removed***/reviews/yi-m1-mirrorless-ilc-first-impressions-review/2 So, a typo by DPreview? ;-) 2) No one said 4K 24p, on the contrary, the word "if" written in my post means that if 24p would be present (so, according to DPreview as the other poster mercer also wisely pointed out in his post, it is not ; ) the bitrate would be higher because the fewer frames per second you (need to) record, the more bitrate you can reach going with a lower frame rate. To pay attention to between the lines can always be useful :-)

And, as already written, already matched by G7 too.

Right. For some reason ; ) 1080p from their DSLR line since they introduced the thrill 8 years ago with 5DII, is not the best find out there... ;-)

Yes, as far as they say. So, 24p, if present, would be higher.

It is 75Mbps@4K DCI.

I think the poster was referring Canon in general, typical Canon look, not specific models or applied technology as case study. You both are right though. 1080p has never been great with Canon because of the way they handle it, I say.

https://***URL removed***/reviews/yi-m1-mirrorless-ilc-first-impressions-review

Unless Magic Lantern will overcome it...

Just wondering... Can you satisfy my curiosity...? What's yours?

It does seem so...

This high resolution mode is also pretty interesting and sensor related: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/olympus-pen-f/olympus-pen-fTECH2.HTM https://photographylife.com/ibis-high-resolution-mode-amazing-technology

Raw is obviously a sorta euphemism... :D

I wouldn't rule out the faster (at wide end) Panny 12-60mm, now announced, anyway. Less expensive, I believe. And handy for a second Panasonic/Oly body.

https://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Voyeur-Right-Digital-Cameras/dp/B0027IK4E0

fps means per second, so it is sequential shooting, of course : ) The burst might be longer but it should take only 1 second, I guess :-)

Yes, of course. No one is alone here. To each its own, at same time. And maybe your needs can also be mine, despite my different approach on it. I can even concur, but no less than in both ways when GH5 comes now with the most wanted wishful list ever fulfilled in the possible package to match 10-bit 4:2:2 & 4K 60p for real indies. Take a look into the post above by sudopera, that resumes the whole point from my angle :-)

I see people here are much more focused in convenience than IQ. GH4 was the first one to introduce 10-bit for such prosumer price range. So does GH5 in 2017, but internally. Oly, Sony, etc to follow for next releases. That counts to me.

Let's realistically presume that. Even though, the question is very pertinent and sorta wishful thinking from all of us, as well. I bet their upgrade is more based on processing data than sensor related, this time. Hence, internal 10-bit 4:2:2, 4K@60fps, higher bitrate (even still under NDA for now). I hope to be pretty wrong on that one, though.

Have you ever tested to replace it with a gimbal? There are many options out there. With much distinct outcome than specs on a paper can ever explain.