Emanuel

Marvel, Andrew : ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Cinematic_Universe I FULLY agree with him : -) That's disgusting content, as simple as that. Fortunately, cinema will never be destroyed by these silly attempts to pollute our time and universe... : P Funny you Andrew didn't notice the acronym if not ultimate sarcasm : D which is symptomatic everything is not yet lost, after all, there's still hope for this planet ; -) So BTW, I don't even watch them either!

: -)

Big not beg... : -)

You see? Plain of solutions along the right setting... Nothing wrong with the tool ; -)

Is Tilta Nucleus Nano the only focus controller available? Proud for a new more achievement from your hands, old chap! : ) When will we finally have auto focus in our Pockets? I don't even dare to tell you I want this toy for Christmas or Santa Claus can enroll me in the list of the bad boys of the year! LOL ; -)

Rather particular Alphaville's song cover... to those who love such music piece: ...and here's the original one:

Well, I tried my best... ...but once people here try to currently watch TV or streaming shows... LOL : ) ...what about those known as movies aka bigger than life? Some other two much more known masterpieces from East... And from one of the greatest masters of this craft unfortunately already not with us anymore:

Hey, but who said it must be TV...? Because of the thread's title? LOL I currently watch only a bit of stuff made for small screen, as matter of fact... It can be TV, yes, obviously but no less the imagerie produced for big screen : -)

Forget that strange pinky karma to become sorta orange and teal by default over there you can retract even in-camera and let's give a chance from this new mobile device -- just needs the user to bring it to life:

Well, good old Kodak 35mm... ; ) From those suggestions and now strictly in a pure geek POV, not exactly the scope of this thread though (BTW that new Christian Petzold's Transit is absolutely remarkable), RED cameras lead so far... A funny LOL to those who bet on their coffin ; -)

One is the aesthetics or form factor reasons, the other one is comparing apples to oranges as far as IQ concerns.

Computational photography will be the future and these mobile toys are incredibly exciting tools. But there's no way a bigger box won't provide you a better outcome...

Here's a 1st entry of my liking: BTW for the geek inside you, that was shot on 4K DJI Osmo X5R & Red Weapon 6K. I am all curious on yours...

Romance with past is gone... WTH is that?! Everyone got the point, I guess, but... ...that is past you don't see anyone to mimic or then show me who is going in the same boat: I think one of these days someone should open a thread with the fav screenings of each one these current days. Done:

Can seem to you but it is not an ad hominem attack, your point (my target) instead... For the person you are : ) Don't take it personally, that "YOU and" means the leftover, not you ; ) For some reason, I wrote "YOU" in capital letters and added the conjunction "and". Not "or". The devil is in the details ; ) pay more attention to it and please read again the condescending tone of your statement which triggered such response. You can't ask what you're unable to give. It doesn't matter how popular you are or how many approvals your team if so attaches to you. Sorry mate, but these forums seem a comedy at times : ) For a simple reason, people are not OBVIOUSLY at same level of experience, background, etc. But they exactly have the same rights of posting as due. Which looks like democracy serves the discussion. Eventually. But not the facts or the conclusions to extract from there. Especially when it is flawed by opinions of nice fellas like you. No matter how inaccurate it is. This doesn't serve any community. Fortunately, it doesn't happen as often.

We ain't speaking about the same... LOL That's for sure! : ) Tell me, what kind of filmmaking you mention up there? That one people look for the best tool to couple the finest IQ and match a proper best bang for the buck? Really? That is, as the wiser producer would raise going with the most effective production value the budget can afford. Or a mere show off to prove to himself/herself (most likely) : D friends, acquaintances and relatives, i.e., to the world : P how shiny the gimmick-piece looks? : -D With the due respect, seems YOU and a few filmmakers of keyboard are the ones who don't understand the thing over there. One thing is to be enthusiastic on these tools (BTW I am one of the few to feed the information about mobile photography tools in these boards, I don't see you to participate too much in those threads if not when Santa Claus goes to town) the other one is to think we're the smarter one who knows the craft over the other side ; -)

Not pocket, the mid range you say will diminish... ; ) It's a mere gimmick as filmmaking camera, not the same as tool. Different meaning stuff : -)

https://noamkroll.com/why-iphones-are-now-the-inevitable-future-of-independent-filmmaking/