gelaxstudio

the body is not all that matter ,lens maybe higher value than the camera

all sony E lens is metal,while canon & nikon lens are not,some  expensive lens  they made are plastic body

On 2016年6月7日 at 10:14 PM, hmcindie said:

And with a shit usability.

P.S It's funny reading through gelaxstudios message history from 2012. It's like reading a Sony fanboy page. Four years of typing the same messages over and over?

You judge something without a detail review and now judging me? A load of piffle

I did not seeing any professional review evaluate the lens on rx10 as trash,but reviews like thecamerastoreTV and cinema5d did shows the xc10 lens is just a plastics toy,and you trying to compare a plastics lens with a metal lens and said the metal one is shit?

Dude,you are so fanboy than I can be ,one without brain

On 2016年6月7日 at 10:14 PM, hmcindie said:

And with a shit usability.

P.S It's funny reading through gelaxstudios message history from 2012. It's like reading a Sony fanboy page. Four years of typing the same messages over and over?

You judge something without a detail review and now judging me? A load of piffle

I did not seeing any professional review evaluate the lens on rx10 as trash,but reviews like thecamerastoreTV and cinema5d did shows the xc10 lens is just a plastics toy,and you trying to compare a plastics lens with a metal lens and said the metal one is shit?

Dude,you are so fanboy than I can be ,one without brain

On 2016年6月7日 at 10:14 PM, hmcindie said:

And with a shit usability.

P.S It's funny reading through gelaxstudios message history from 2012. It's like reading a Sony fanboy page. Four years of typing the same messages over and over?

You judge something without a detail review and now judging me? A load of piffle

I did not seeing any professional review evaluate the lens on rx10 as trash,but reviews like thecamerastoreTV and cinema5d did shows the xc10 lens is just a plastics toy,and you trying to compare a plastics lens with a metal lens and said the metal one is shit?

Dude,you are so fanboy than I can be ,one without brain

Fuji T-2 is coming !With 4K!

4 hours ago, josef said:

Everybody keeps asking about making the lens constant 2.8... I'd love that but it would be much more expensive as a result.  What about removing the lens and giving us an EF mount so we can use our own glass? I think if Canon did that they'd find more buyers for this kit.

But sony and zeiss  did make one under $1000 (RX10) and a fast one with F1.8(rx100),and all with powerzoom

5 hours ago, David Bowgett said:

The two main guys might have thought that, but one of their other reviewers also took a look at it in their 5DS review and was a lot more positive about it, saying that while there were a lot of annoying issues with the camera's design, the actual video quality was pretty good.

https://youtu.be/QwLZRKfFmUY?t=12m57s

 

The lens and build quality of the XC10  are terrible,a $2000 cam with totally plastic body,can u believe that?

It is ridiculous to use it as a working tool,and it is not underrated,it is a mistake that canon made!

8 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

The ones who are confused clearly were like me when I didn't own an XC10, just looking at the specs and even the JPEG resolution (for reasons only they can know!) and thinking that it is an expensive, odd product, lagging behind Sony in the specs race.

Try one, get to know it, look at the images, you will be surprised like I was what a lot of fun it is and how great the images can be.

uh...TheCameraStoreTV gave it the award as the worst video camera of 2015 and the lens was awarded one of the top three worst lenses of 2015 !

https://youtu.be/Mexs7HvHR2I?t=1316

On 2016年6月3日 at 10:45 AM, independent said:

Its sucks, but really, it's useless bitching. Every company is trying to post short term profits. Its just reality in the 21st century. Or, try writing them a nice handwritten letter.

 

Apparently,5D4 will just like the 1DXII with ancient  codec and in lack of all cinema features

It is destined to be a fact in the  next 4 years,but many canon fans just feel hard to accept it

On 2016年5月26日 at 9:11 PM, jgharding said:

Yeah I use Canon too as they're great to use and the footage looks brilliant. Indeed I sold an RX10 ii and got an XC10 precisely because of what you describe.

If you check out the XC10 review on DPreview ,you will see RX10II actually perform better

The image of the RX10II is sharper (specally at the edge of the image),less Moire ,and skin tone is close to the CX10

2 hours ago, BenEricson said:

Exactly. You can talk specs all day, but the XC10 produces a better image than the RX10, same with the C100ii vs the FS5.

Are you sure ?

http://***URL removed***/reviews/crossing-the-bridge-canon-xc10-review/7

4 hours ago, Oliver Daniel said:

You could also say the same about Canon. I find using their cameras a much more enjoyable experience then using a Sony for instance.

Why?

I don't work well with canon cams.

They in lack of customizable buttons, customizable menu , some auxiliary features like zebra and preaking ,power zoom ,picture profiles for colour creativities,and not IBIS

I think they work easily because they are simple

Some people criticize menu system on sony,but its menu contain times more features than the canon cams in the same levels,it take time to get used to it

On 2016年5月24日 at 3:49 AM, Mattias Burling said:

Its nice that they are getting 4K, but imo, an old 5Dmkiii with ML still beats A7sii/rii, GH4, etc and probably will trump the GH5 as well.
So there is a big chance the new 5Div will get its ass kicked by its own predecessor.

14BIT 2K raw with 11 stops DR beats 8BIT 4K with 14 stops DR? I don't think so

BTW,all hack are risky,what if it cause hardware problems or data crash?

Do you think ML taem will take that responsibility?

Not to mention your reputation maybe ruin if problems happen  when you  shooting videos for your client

sony cams do overheat somtimes ,but it won't ruin your all day work

3 hours ago, Zach Ashcraft said:

I truly don't understand why everyone is so adamant about having C-Log on the 5D4. I've got it on the C100 mk 2 and rarely if ever use it. Its just a massive pain in the but when shooting and grading. Images are just great using Wide DR, or even some of the more basic profiles.

Without c-log ,5D4 only get poor DR like a cellphone~

Without log and supersampling ,it make no difference,and just like the IQ of 5D2 in 2008,except the 4k

This is what I bet 5D4 will be (90%)

4K 30P and FHD 120P

shot 4K with 1.5 crop (even double-chips 1DXII has to crop for 4k,no exceptions for 5D4 )

24M pixels (on-chip ADC)

the same focus system like 1DXII including DPAF

Mjpeg for 4K,500M/s  ( class-leading compression  quality,uh... and Cfast cards only)

WIFI

touchscreen

dual cards slots:

And then a bunch of NO

no c-log (100% sure)

no peaking no zebra (100% sure)

no 4k output (100% sure)

no tilting LCD (100% sure)

no oversampling or full pixels read out for  FHD (100% sure)

no HDR video mode  (50% sure)

Finally,priced around $3800

On 2016年5月10日 at 7:06 AM, DBounce said:

They don't... The Canon is in a whole other class. Even in low-light where most cameras will struggle, the 1DX Mkii finds focus. It really is... and I mean this... a game changer.

How it become a no game changer. without peaking\ log\tilting LCD\4K output ect.?

And it still using old codec even with dual processors in it

17 hours ago, DBounce said:

Tested the 1DX Mkii on the Letus Helix, so far all is good. Still sorting through the manual. Took some test shots over the weekend verse my Sony A7ii and A7Rii. The Canon is way cleaner, requiring far less gain to expose in low light conditions that either of the Sonys.

less gain noise？can you show some comparison  pics ？

4 hours ago, Mattias Burling said:

They can just make it for EF lenses. Easy.

 

Like the ulgy Pentax K01?

13 hours ago, wolf33d said:

1 year ago I published a post on EOSHD telling people why it is 100% obvious that Canon will put 4k on the 5DIV with a list of arguments.

5DIV with 4K is easy,but developing a FF mirriorless with FF M-lens line means a huge change,not to mention it will threaten their existing DSLR line

It is impossible over the next 4 years~

Do you see how the EOS-M going now ?

It is way behind  its competitors,specially the short battery life

BTW , I have just found that dual piexl AF will stop working  during zooming,anyone know why?And does it the same on C300M2?

10 hours ago, wolf33d said:

This video is hilarious. 
It is funny though that your are not mentioning @Andrew Reid the confirmed new FF mirrorless by Canon (CR5 canonrumors). Should be more interesting for us than the 5DIV. Planned for end of the year. 
 

new FF mirrorless by Canon?

U actually believe that joke?

9 hours ago, TheRenaissanceMan said:

I actually agree that the codec produces great results. Unmatched by any other 8-bit image, really. But in terms of efficiency, you have to admit it's an absolute card hog.

The H264 codec also produce very great results. othewise canon won't use XF-AVC for their C cams ,and other brand also use H264 for their 4K cams

The only problem that canon don't use H264 for the 1DXII is either processor shortage or  just do it on purpose for protecting C-line

3 hours ago, Jimmy said:

You are right... Yet if that is the only way to get 4:2:2 and really good motion cadence, then that seems like a positive, not a negative.

Having a bleeding edge codec is not always a great thing, go ask Samsung.

uh...Mjpeg actually was invented since the 1990s

5 hours ago, hmcindie said:

Funny how it still looks that much better than the 4k codec variations Sony uses on it's cams. The 4k h264 out of the A7sII series is considerably worse (just zoom in 100% into any slightly moving shot and you can see those macroblocks pushing themselves out).

Even mpeg1 can still look great as it actually supports over 4k and 8-12 bits.

when did people watch video with 100% zoom?

4 hours ago, hmcindie said:

It has a couple of great advantages.

+It's all-i (no motion artifacts)

+Computationally easier on the CPU (though it will take a toll on harddrive speed, especially if doing 4k60p)

+Well supported.

Another all-i codec would've been much more difficult to obtain and manufacture (how many DSLR's shoot ALL-i? The 1Dc but that's it). And I would definitely take this MJPEG codec than the 4k h264 codecs Sony uses. I have used four Sony cams with 4k h264 (A7sII, A7rII, RX10ii and the a6300) and they all have more compression artifacts than the MJPEG on the 1Dc.

Hey

Actually ALL-I can also be encoded by using H264

BTW,those HUGE video files come from 1DXII requires a lot of harddrives for  storage ,A lot!

And do you know how fast common mechanical hard disk can read? 

Their average value only 100MB ,so as the buffer will slow everything down

Unlike sony cams with 4K high bitrate output, 1DXII users have no choice but using that inefficient codec,plus no 4K monitoring

1 hour ago, kgv5 said:

800mbit is not much bigger than 660mbit of 5d3 raw, this amount of data is certainly manageble. Besides 1dxii can record 4k 24/25/30 and 1080p 24/25/30/60/120 to cheaper (but fast) CF cards, CFast is needed only for 50/60p 4k.

Now you should see the point,the 800Mbps 8bit Mjpeg is even bigger than the 14bit raw with full DR,so it is a poor codec,why not wait untill ML hack it?

On 2016年4月28日 at 11:53 PM, Zach Ashcraft said:

If I had the money I'd buy a 1DXII in a heartbeat. The image looks beautiful and in terms of usability, I love the form factor and touch + DPAF combo. Hoping some of this functionality makes its way to the 5d4

Firstly ，prepare about 30 CFast cards for daily use，because that 800Mbps Mjpeg codec makes huge file size

21 hours ago, Andrew Reid said:

Sony need to be careful how far they push the prices up.

The only brand that should warry about overpricing their products is Canon,even their APS-C flagship  7D2 cannot shoot 4K,and not provide log ,nor super sampling

Even thier new FF flagship 1DXII using antique codec instead of the XF-AVC

19 hours ago, wolf33d said:

We all know that you could do:

A full frame mirrorless, usual Canon ergonomics and color science, 20-36 mpx, articulated touch screen LCD, DPAF, in body 5 axis stab, 4K at 60 FPS and 1080p at 120 FPS like the 1Dx2 with C-LOG. WIth EF mount.

12 hours ago, Ebrahim Saadawi said:

Canon will not make a mirrorless full frame camera. Period. They believe the mirrorless line is APS-C and they WILL release a higher-end APS-C EOS M soon. So first requestm nota chance. You'll get a DSLR if you want full-frame.

Canon clearly state that they believe in-camera stabilization is a lot less accurate than in-camera stabilization as it can be made and tuned for each lens/optical formula. They will not give you IBIS. 

To get 60p at 4K they need the 1DX size with CFAST 2.0 slot that literally still gives you an almost 3rd degree burn when you shoot a sequence. So not going to happen in a smaller camera, physically impossible for Canon at the moment.

Hey,guys

If you really want Canon to change ,the first step is to be their largest shareholder,otherwise nothing you say make a difference

On 2016年4月18日 at 4:20 PM, tugela said:

Actually, something like a 80D is far too heavy and bulky to be a good vlog camera. If you are going to be walking around holding something at arms length, if that something weighs 730g for the body alone, not counting the lens, it is going to wear down on you pretty quickly, autofocus or no autofocus.

The ideal vloging camera is something that is small and light. No doubt some he-man types will use it, but for most vloggers (who seem to be typically young women in late teens to early twenties) the 80D is simply too big for that purpose.

Weight is a big problem for  shooting handheld  and  for shooting first-person (VR) video as well

On 2016年4月18日 at 2:30 AM, compasiune said:

 The 80D offers a slightly smaller size over the 7d II and the latest Canon sensor. I got it as a back up to my 7D II.

yeah ,a much cheaper 80D has better IQ than the superior model 7DII.so unlike canon-style ;)