ntblowz

Yeah 17.5mm , clickless aperture and wide range make it more usable than 25mm

Well LX-7 have 120fps in HD mode (much better than those VGA or less from other company), which should be good for people who want to do slo-mo without spending big $$$

Well I think Voigtlander 17.5mm is a much better lens for both stills and moving image, and image quality is also improved over the 25mm, though it is more pricier

some shots with 17.5mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/monkp/7156830184/

[quote author=Dragan link=topic=478.msg3116#msg3116 date=1332937707]
I bought a GH2 some 8 months ago after reading a couple of your articles Andrew and am so much happy that GH2 is still in the ring even after the 5DMkIII jumped in :)

Just one quick question.. what is a good cheap wide lens i can use with my GH2?

Thanks for your article and advice.
[/quote]

Panasonic 14mm for $170 on ebay and the Sony ECL-VCU1 addon for $100 to make it ultra wide

thanks for the compare, so GH2 still have the edge on clarity

Sorry to hear your loss, 3rd party battery is only good for emergency use only

Yeah with full time AF and IBIS it add a lot more heat than NEX camera in Video, I think A35 is better in this regard since it can shoot much longer without overheating problem, but then the EVF is conventional one and fixed screen.

from [url=http://www.mu-43.com/f97/clipwrap-20-discount-next-week-19341/]http://www.mu-43.com/f97/clipwrap-20-discount-next-week-19341/[/url], you can get 20% off with coupon "progressive4life"

lol very tempted to get one of these!

Giving that GH2 body only haven't been slashed so this is a good probability that it could team up with X lens, does it mean that X lens will come down in price given that it will be mass produced and paired up across the line?